The case for expanding standards for teacher evaluation to include an instructional supervision perspective

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 67-77

  Holland, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation standards; Instructional supervision; Teacher evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746253683     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-006-9009-0     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Bambino, D. (2002). Critical friends. Educational Leadership 59(6), 25-27.
2. Cogan, M. (1973). Clinical Supervision. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
3. Costa, A. & Garmston, R. (2002). Cognitive Coaching: A Foundation for Renaissance Schools, 2nd edn. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon.
4. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1989). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record 91(1), 59-80.
6. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher evaluation in transition: emerging roles and evolving methods. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers. Newbury Park, California: SAGE.
7. Davis, D., Ellett, C., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16(4), 287-301.
8. Dunne, F., Nave, B., & Lewis, A. (2000). Critical friends groups: teachers helping teachers to improve student learning. Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development and Research Bulletin, No. 28.
9. Garman, N. (1982). The clinical approach to supervision. In T. Sergiovanni (Ed.), Supervision of Teaching. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10. Gitlin, A., & Smyth, J. (1989). Teacher Evaluation: Educative Alternatives. London: Falmer.
11. Glatthorn, A. (1997). Differentiated Supervision, 2nd edn. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. Glickman, C., Gordon, S., & Ross-Gordon, J. (2003). Supervision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R., & Krajewski, R. (1980). Clinical Supervision, 2nd edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
14. Gordon, S. (1992). Paradigms, transitions, and the new supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 5(1), 62-76.
15. Gordon, S. (Ed.) (2005). Standards for Instructional Supervision: Focus on Professional Development. Larchmont, New York: Eye on Education.
16. Hazi, H. (1.994). The teacher evaluation-supervision dilemma: a case of entanglements and irreconcilable differences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 9(2), 195-216.
17. Heartel, E. (1991). New forms of teacher assessment. Review of Research in Education 17, 2-29.
18. Holland, P., & Garman, N. (2001). Toward a resolution of the crisis of legitimacy in the field of supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 16(2), 95-111.
19. Holland, P., & Adams, P. (2002). Through the horns of a dilemma between instructional supervision and the summative evaluation of teaching. International Journal of Leadership in Education 5(3), 227-247.
20. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The Personnel Evaluation Standards. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
21. Little, J. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15(2), 129-151.
22. McGreal, T. (1988). Evaluation for enhancing instruction: linking teacher evaluation and staff development. In S. Stanley & W. Popham (Eds.), Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions for Success. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23. McLaughlin, M. (1990). Embracing contraries: implementing and sustaining school reform. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers. Newbury Park, California: SAGE.
24. Natriello, G. (1990). Intended and unintended consequences: purposes and effects of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers. Newbury Park, California: SAGE.
25. Nolan, J. (1989). Can supervisory practice embrace Schon's concept of reflective practice? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 5(1), 35-40.
26. Nolan, J. (1997). Can a supervisor be a coach? In J. Glanz & R. Neville (Eds.), Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues and Controversies. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon.
27. Schwandt, T. (2002). Evaluation Practice Reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.
28. Scriven, M. (1988). Evaluating teachers as professionals: the duties-based approach. In S. Stanley & W. Popham (Eds.), Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions For Success. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29. Smylie, M. (1996). From bureaucratic control to building human capital: the importance of teacher learning in education reform. Educational Researcher 25(9), 9-11.
30. Smyth, J. (ed.) (1986). Learning about Teaching through Clinical Supervision. London: Croom Helm.
31. Starratt, R. (1997). Should supervision be abolished? In J. Glanz & R. Neville (eds.), Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues And Controversies. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon.
32. St. Maurice, H. (2004). Toward Standards for Instructional Leadership: a geneology of standards. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California, April 12, 2004.
33. Stufflebeam, D. (1998). Conflicts between standards-based and postmodernist evaluations: Toward Rapprochement. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12(3), 287-296.
34. Stufflebeam, D., & Sanders, J. (1990). Using the personnel evaluation standards to improve teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers. Newbury Park, California: SAGE.
35. Waite, D. (1997). Do teachers benefit from supervision? In J. Glanz & R. Neville (Eds.), Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues and Controversies. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon.
36. Wise, A., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1985). Teacher evaluation and teacher professionalism. Educational Leadership 42 (4), 28-33.
37. Wolff-Michael, R., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15(1), 7-29.
38. Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (2000). The language of standards and teacher education reform. Educational Policy 14(1), 94-106.