Parallel evolution of nonfeeding larvae in echinoids

Systematic Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 308-322

  Wray, Gregory A ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental evolution; Disparity; Echinoidea; Larva; Life history evolution

Indexed keywords

ECHINOIDEA;

EID: 0030313331     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/45.3.308     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. AMEMIYA, S., AND R. B. EMLET. 1992. The development and larval form of an echinothurioid echinoid, Asthenosoma ijimai, revisited. Biol. Bull. 182:15-30.
2. AMEMIYA, S., AND T. TSUCHIYA. 1979. Development of the echinothurioid sea urchin Asthenosoma ijimai. Mar. Biol. 52:93-96.
3. BAUM, D. A., AND A. LARSON. 1991. Adaptation reviewed: A phylogenetic methodology for studying character macroevolution. Syst. Zool. 40:1-18.
4. BYRNE, M. 1991. Developmental diversity in the starfish genus Patiriella (Asteroidea: Asterinidae). Pages 499-508 in Biology of Echinodermata (T. Yanigasawa, I. Yasumasu, C. Oguro, N. Suzuki, and T. Motokawa, eds.). Balkema, Rotterdam.
5. CRACRAFT, J. 1990. The origin of evolutionary novelties: Pattern and process at different hierarchical levels. Pages 21-44 in Evolutionary innovations (M. H. Nitecki, ed.). Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. EMLET, R. B. 1986. Facultative planktotrophy in the tropical echinoid Clypeaster rosaceus (Linnaeus) and a comparison with obligate planktotrophy in Clypeaster subdepressus (Gray) (Clypeasteroida: Echinoidea). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 95:183-202.
7. EMLET, R. B. 1990. World patterns of developmental mode in echinoid echinoderms. Pages 329-335 in Advances in invertebrate reproduction (M. Hoshi and O. Yamishita, eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
8. EMLET, R. B. 1991. Functional constraints on the evolution of larval forms of marine invertebrates: Experimental and comparative evidence. Am. Zool. 31: 707-725.
9. EMLET, R. B. 1995. Larval spicules, cilia, and symmetry as remnants of indirect development in the direct developing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Dev. Biol. 16:405-415.
10. EMLET, R. B., L. R. MCEDWARD, AND R. R. STRATHMANN. 1987. Echinoderm larval ecology viewed from the egg. Echinoderm Stud. 2:55-136.
11. FOOTE, M. 1993. Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 19:185-204.
12. GOULD, S. J. 1991. The disparity of the Burgess Shale arthropod fauna and the limits of cladistic analysis: Why we must strive to quantify morphospace. Paleobiology 17:411-423.
13. HART, M. W. 1991. Particle capture and the method of suspension feeding by echinoderm larvae. Biol. Bull. 180:12-27.
14. HART, M. W. 1996. Evolutionary loss of larval feeding: Development, form, and function in a facultatively feeding larva, Brisaster latifrons. Evolution (in press).
15. HAVENHAND, J. 1995. Evolutionary ecology of life histories. Pages 79-122 in Ecology of marine invertebrate larvae (L. R. McEdward, ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
16. HENDLER, G. 1982. An echinoderm vitellaria with a bilateral larval skeleton: Evidence for the evolution of ophiuroid vitellariae from ophioplutei. Biol. Bull. 163:431-137.
17. HENRY, J. J., G. A. WRAY, AND R. A. RAFF. 1991. Mechanism of an alternative type of echinoderm blastula formation: The wrinkled blastula of the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Dev. Growth Differ. 33: 317-328.
18. JABLONSKI, D. 1986. Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39:565-587.
19. JAGERSTEN, G. 1972. Evolution of the metazoan life cycle. Academic Press, London.
20. KIER, P. M. 1969. Sexual dimorphism in fossil echinoids. Pages 215-222 in Sexual dimorphism in fossil metazoa and taxonomic implications (G. E. G. Westerman, ed.). Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
21. KUME, M., AND K. DAN. 1968. Invertebrate embryology. NOLIT Press, Belgrade, Yugoslavia.
22. LAUDER, G. V. 1982. Historical biology and the problem of design. J. Theor. Biol. 97:57-67.
23. LAUDER, G. V. 1990. Functional morphology and systematics: Studying functional patterns in an historical context. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:317-340.
24. LITTLEWOOD, D. T. J., AND A. B. SMITH. 1995. A combined morphological and molecular phylogeny for sea urchins (Echinoidea: Echinodermata). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 347:213-234.
25. MADDISON, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44:539-557.
26. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade, version 3.01. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
27. MCMILLAN, W. O., R. A. RAFF, AND S. R. PALUMBI. 1992. Population genetic consequences of developmental evolution in sea urchins (genus Heliocidaris). Evolution 46:1299-1312.
28. MLADENOV, P. V. 1979. Unusual lecithotrophic development of the Carribean brittle star Ophiothrix oerstedi. Mar. Biol. 55:55-62.
29. MOOI, R. 1990. Paedomorphosis, Aristotle's lantern, and the origin of the sand dollars (Echinodermata: Clypeasteroida). Paleobiology 16:25-48.
30. MORGAN, S. G. 1995. Life and death in the plankton. Pages 279-321 in Ecology of marine invertebrate larvae (L. R. McEdward, ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
31. MORRIS, V. B. 1995. Apluteal development: of the sea urchin Holopneustes purpurescens Agassiz (Echinodermata: Echinoidea: Euechinoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 114:349-364.
32. MORTENSEM, T. 1921. Studies of the development and larval forms of echinoderms. G.E.C. Gad, Copenhagen.
33. OKAZAKI, K. 1975. Normal development to metamorphosis. Pages 177-232 in The sea urchin embryo (G. Czihak, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
34. OKAZAKI, K., AND K. DAN. 1954. The metamorphosis of partial larvae of Perotnila japonica Mortensen, a sand dollar. Biol. Bull. 106:83-99.
35. OLSON, R. R., J. L. CAMERON, AND C. M. YOUNG. 1993. Larval development (with some observations on spawning) of the pencil urchin Phyllacanthus imperialis: A new intermediate larval form? Biol. Bull. 185:77-85.
36. PARKS, A. L., B. W. BISGROVE, G. A. WRAY, AND R. A. RAFF. 1939. Direct development in the sea urchin Phyllacanthus parvispinus (Cidaroidea): Phylogenetic history and functional modification. Biol. Bull. 177: 96-109.
37. PHILIP, G. M., AND R. J. FOSTER. 1971. Marsupiate Tertiary echinoids from southeastern Australia and their Zoogeographic significance. Palaeontology 14: 666-695.
38. RAFF, R. A. 1987. Constraint, flexibility, and phylogenetic history in the evolution of direct development in sea urchins. Dev. Biol. 119:6-19.
39. RAFF, R. A. 1992. Direct-developing sea urchins and the evolutionary reorganization of early development. BioEssays 14:211-218.
40. RAFF, R. A., K. G. FIELD, M. T. GHISELIN, D. J. LANE, G. J. OLSEN, N. R. PACE, A. L. PARKS, B. P. PARR, AND E. C. RAFF. 1988. Molecular analysis of distant phylogenetic relationships in echinoderms. Pages 29-41 in Echinoderm phytogeny and evolutionary biology (C. R. C. Paul and A. B. Smith, eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
41. ROMAN, J. 1983. Échindes «marsupiaux» (fam. Temnopleuridae) dans le Néogène de l'ouest Européen. Ann. Paléontol. Vertebr. Invertebr. 69:13-42.
42. RUMRILL, S. S. 1990. Natural mortality of marine invertebrate larvae. Ophelia 32:163-198.
43. SEILACHER, A. 1990. The sand-dollar syndrome: A polyphyletic constructional breakthrough. Pages 231-252 in Evolutionary innovations (M. H. Nitecki, ed.). Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
44. SMITH, A. B., B. LAFAY, AND R. CHRISTEN. 1993. Comparative variation of morphological and molecular evolution through geological time: 28S ribosomal RNA versus morphology in echinoids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 338:365-382.
45. SMITH, A. B., D. T. J. LITTLEWOOD, AND G. A. WRAY. 1995. Comparing patterns of evolution: Larval and adult life history stages and small subunit ribosomal RNA of post-Paleozoic echinoids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 349:11-18.
46. SMITH, M. J., J. D. G. BOOM, AND R. A. RAFF. 1990. Single-copy DNA distance between two congeneric sea urchin species exhibiting radically different modes of development. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:315-326.
47. STRATHMANN, R. R. 1971. The feeding behavior of planktotrophic echinoderm larvae: Mechanisms, regulation, and rates of suspension feeding. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 6:109-160.
48. STRATHMANN, R. R. 1985. Feeding and nonfeeding larval development and life-history evolution in marine invertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:339-361.
49. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
50. WILLIAMS, D. H. C., AND D. T. ANDERSON. 1975. The reproductive system, embryonic development, larval development and metamorphosis of the sea urchin Heliocidaris etythrogramma (Val.) (Echinoidea: Echinometridae). Aust. J. Zool. 23:371-403.
51. WILLS, M. A., D. E. G. BRIGGS, AND R. A. FORTEY. 1994. Disparity as an evolutionary index: A comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Paleobiology 20:93-130.
52. WRAY, G. A. 1992. The evolution of larval morphology during the post-Paleozoic radiation of echinoids. Paleobiology 18:258-287.
53. WRAY, G. A. 1995. Larval morphology and echinoid phytogeny. Page 92.1 in Echinoderms through time (B. David, A. Guille, J.-P. Féral, and M. Roux, eds.). Balkema Press, Rotterdam.
54. WRAY, G. A., AND A. E. BELY. 1994. The evolution of echinoderm development is driven by several distinct factors. Development 1994(suppl.):97-106.
55. WRAY, G. A., AND R. A. RAFF. 1991. The evolution of developmental strategy in marine invertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:45-50.