Target-assisted selection of galactosyltransferase binders from dynamic combinatorial libraries. An unexpected solution with restricted amounts of the enzyme

ChemBioChem

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1023-1027

  Valade, Anne ^a   Urban, Dominique ^a   Beau, Jean Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Cabohydrates; Combinatorial chemistry; Enzyme inhibitors; Molecular recognition; Self assembly

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; ALPHA 1,3 GALACTOSYLTRANSFERASE; AMIDE; DIAMINE DERIVATIVE; GALACTOSE; NUCLEOTIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME BINDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNTHESIS;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; ENZYME INHIBITORS; GALACTOSYLTRANSFERASES; MOLECULAR PROBE TECHNIQUES; PROTEIN BINDING; URIDINE DIPHOSPHATE GALACTOSE;

EID: 33745930819     PISSN: 14394227     EISSN: 14397633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200600022     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. A. Varki, Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97.
2. a) X. Qian, M. M. Palcic in Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology, (Eds.: B. Ernst, G. W. Hart, P. Sinäy), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim; 2000, 3, 293;
3. b) P. Compain, O. R. Martin, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 3077;
4. c) For an up-to-date 3D structure database of glycosyltransferases see www. cermav.cnrs.fr/cgi-bin/rxgt/rxgt.cgi
5. J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455;
6. I. Huc, R. Nguyen, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2001, 4, 109;
7. S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, G. R. L. Cousins, J. K. M. Sanders, J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 938;
8. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898;
9. J. D. Cheeseman, A. D. Corbett, J. L. Gleason, R. J. Kazlauskas, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1708.
10. a) I. Huc, J.-M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 2106;
11. b) T. Bunyapaiboonsri, O. Ramström, S. Lohman, J.-M. Lehn, L. Peng, M. Goeldner, ChemBioChem 2001, 2, 438;
12. c) M. Hochgürtel, H. Kroth, D. Piecha, M. W. Hofmann, C. Nicolau, S. Krause, O. Schaaf, G. Sonnenmoser, A. V. Eliseev, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 3382;
13. d) M. Hochgürtel, R. Biesinger, H. Kroth, D. Piecha, M. W. Hofmann, S. Krause, O. Schaaf, C. Nicolau, A. V. Eliseev, J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 356;
14. e) T. Bunyapaiboonsri, H. Ramström, O. Ramström, J. Haiech, J.-M. Lehn, J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5803;
15. f) M. S. Congreve, D. J. Davis, L. Devine, C. Granata, M. O'Reilly, P. G. Wyatt, H. Jhoti, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 4617;
16. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4479.
17. S. Zameo, B. Vauzeilles, J.-M. Beau, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 987;
18. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 965.
19. Z. Grote, R. Scopelliti, K. Severin, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3951;
20. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3821;
21. P. T. Corbett, S. Otto, J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3139;
22. P. T. Corbett, J. K. M. Sanders, S. Otto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9390.
23. In this paper, the term "imines" will designate the totality of the assembled members of the library (imines, hemi-aminals, aminals and their protonated species).
24. A. Bruylants, E. Feytmants-De Medecis in The Chemistry of the Carbon-Nitrogen Double Bond (Ed.: S. Patai), Wiley, London, 1970, pp. 465-504;
25. E. H. Cordes, W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2843;
26. J. Hine, F. A. Via, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 190;
27. C. Godoy-Alcantar, A. K. Yatsimirsky, J.-M. Lehn, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 979, and references therein.
28. [5] affinity systems.
29. However, for a self-screening process in which only catalytic amounts of the target protein are present, see R. Larsson, Z. Pei, O. Ramström, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3802;
30. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3716.
31. When taking a good affinity constant for a binder (1 μM), one calculates that the amount of the amplified amine would be approximately in the range of the detection limit of our system (around 20 pmol), with the enzyme at a concentration of 2 μM.
32. The term "amplification" for a library member designates its concentration in the presence of the target divided by its concentration in the absence of the target.
33. 3CN reduction of imines in an aqueous medium.
34. In the course of these studies, information was published on the 3D structure of the α-1,3-galactosyltransferase enzyme, substrates binding and catalytic mechanism, E. Boix, Y. Zhang, G. J. Swaminathan, K. Brew, K. R. Acharya, J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 28310.
35. D. Butler, Nature 1998, 391, 320;
36. D. H. Joziasse, R. Oriol, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1455, 403;
37. M. S. Sandrin, W. L. Fodor, E. Mouhtouris, N. Osman, S. Cohney, S. A. Rollins, E. R. Guilmette, E. Setter, S. P. Squito, I. F. C. McKenzie, Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 1261.
38. a) Y. J. Kim, M. Ichikawa, Y. Ichikawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5829;
39. b) S. Takayama, S. J. Chung, Y. Igarashi, Y. Ichikawa, A. Sepp, R. I. Lechler, J. Wu, T. Hayashi, G. Siuzdak, C.-H. Wong, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 401;
40. c) B. Waldscheck, M. Streiff, W. Notz, W. Kinzy, R. R. Schmidt, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 4120-4124;
41. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4007.
42. An interesting static combinatorial approach with a uridine-based library has been disclosed recently: H. C. Hang, C. Yu, K. G. Ten Hagen, E. Tian, K. A. Winans, L. A. Tabak, C. R. Bertozzi, Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 337.
43. M. Cornia, M. Menozzi, E. Ragg, S. Mazzini, A. Scarafoni, F. Zanardi, G. Casiraghi, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3977;
44. M. Yokoyama, T. Tanabe, A. Toyoshima, H. Togo, Synthesis 1993, 517.
45. G. H. Jones, M. Taniguchi, D. Tegg, J. Moffatt, J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 1309.
46. R. T. Lee, Y. C. Lee, Carbohydr. Res. 1974, 37, 193.
47. M. Newcomb, J. M. Timko, D. M. Walba, D. J. Cram, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6392;
48. Z. Wang, J. Reibenspies, R. J. Motekaitis, A. E. Martell, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1995, 1511.
49. B. M. Kim, S. J. Bae, S. M. So, H. T. Yoo, S. K. Chang, J. H. Lee, J. Kang, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2349;
50. A. Scheurer, P. Mosset, R. W. Saalfrank, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1243;
51. T. Kanger, K. Ausmees, A.-M. Müürisepp, T. Pehk, M. Lopp, Synlett 2003, 1055.
52. LC-MS or LC-evaporative light scattering (ELS) methods of detection were not adapted or not sensitive enough for our compounds.
53. We previously checked that the commercial enzyme was still active after 14 days in a Tris-acetate buffer containing glycerol. Attempts to concentrate the commercial preparation of the enzyme lead to a very significant decrease in the enzyme activity.
54. Because of the UV-detection method, the product distribution was established by using independently prepared reference compounds and was quantified by using the HPLC-UV profile, each peak area being corrected by the molar extinction coefficient of the corresponding amine at 254 nm.
55. T. Ivannikova, F. Bintein, A. Malleron, S. Juliant, M. Cerutti, A. Harduin-Lepers, P. Delannoy, C. Augé, A. Lubineau, Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1153.
56. 50 measurements.