Students, mathematics, and technology: Assessing the present - Challenging the future

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 277-290

  Galbraith, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745625369     PISSN: 0020739X     EISSN: 14645211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207390500321936     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Fey, J.T., 1989, Technology and mathematics education: a survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 237-272.
2. Kaput, J. and Thompson, P., 1994, Technology in mathematics education research: the first 25 years in the JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 676-684.
3. Abbasian, R.O., Iosescu. A., 2002, Case studies in the shortcomings of Maple in teaching undergraduate mathematics. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (Undergraduate). Hobaken, NJ, CD, Wiley, Crete.
4. Noss, R., 2001, For a learnable mathematics in the digital culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 21-46.
5. Zorn, P., 2002, Algebra, computer algebra, and mathematical thinking. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (Undergraduate). Hobaken, NJ, CD, Wiley, Crete.
6. Doerr, H.M. and Zangor, R., 2000, Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143-163.
7. Guin, D. and Trouche, L., 1999, The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: the case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, 195-227.
8. Lagrange, J., 1999, Complex calculators in the classroom: theoretical and practical reflections on teaching pre-calculus. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 51-81.
9. Artigue, M., 2002, Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245-274.
10. Templer, R., Klug, D., Gould, I., Kent, P., Ramsden, P. and James, M., 1998, Mathematics laboratories for science undergraduates. In: C. Hoyles, C. Morgan and G. Woodhouse (Eds.) Rethinking the Mathematics Curriculum (London: Falmer Press), pp. 140-154.
11. Galbraith, P. and Pemberton, M., 2002, Convergence or divergence? Students, Maple and mathematics learning. In: B. Barton, K. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch and M. Thomas (Eds.) Mathematics Education in the South Pacific (Proceedings of 25th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (Sydney: MERGA), pp. 285-292.
12. Kent, P. and Stevenson, I., 1999, 'Calculus in context': a study of undergraduate chemistry students, perceptions of integration. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Haifa, Israel.
13. Fennema, E. and Sherman, J., 1976, Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: a further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 189-203.
14. Schoenfeld, A.H., 1989, Ideas in the air: speculations on small group learning, environmental and cultural influences on cognition, and epistemology. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 71-88.
15. Ma, X. and Kishor, N., 1997, Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26-47.
16. Tartre, L.A. and Fennema, E., 1995, Mathematics achievement and gender: a longitudinal study of selected cognitive and affective variables (Grades 6-12). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 199-217.
17. Tall, D. and Razali, M.R., 1993, Diagnosing students' difficulties in learning mathematics. International Journal for Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 24, 209-222.
18. Hensel, L.T. and Stephens, L.J., 1997, Personality and attitudinal influences on algebra achievement levels. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 28, 25-29.
19. Mackie, D.M., 1992, An evaluation of computer-assisted learning in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 23, 731-737.
20. Park, K., 1993, A comparative study of the traditional calculus and mathematics course. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
21. Melin-Conjeros, J., 1993, The effect of using a computer algebra system in a mathematics laboratory on the achievement and attitude of calculus students. PhD thesis, University of Iowa.
22. Galbraith, P.L. and Haines, C.R., 1998, Disentangling the nexus: attitudes to mathematics and technology in a computer learning environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 275-290.
23. Galbraith, P.L., Haines, C.R. and Pemberton, M., 1999, A tale of two cities: when mathematics, computers, and students meet. In: J.M. Truran and K.M. Truran (Eds.) Making the Difference (Proceedings of Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (Sydney: MERGA), pp. 215-222.
24. Cretchley, P., 2002, Mathematics and technology: how integrated is this learning partnership. In: J. Bohm (Ed.) Proceedings of the Vienna International Symposium on Integrating Technology into Mathematics Education (Vienna: Compact Disc).
25. Machin, M. and Rivero, R., 2002, Students' attitudes towards mathematics and computers when using Derive in the learning of calculus concepts. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 9, 259-279.
26. Funkhouser, C., 2002/2003, The effects of computer-augmented geometry instruction on student performance and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 163-174.
27. Ruthven, K., 1992, Personal technology and classroom change: a British perspective. In: J.T. Fey and C. Hirsch (Eds.) Calculators in Mathematics Education (Reston, VA: NCTM).
28. Ruthven, K., 1995, Pressing on: towards a considered calculator use. In: L. Burton and B. Jaworski (Eds.) Technology in mathematics Teaching: a bridge between teaching and learning (Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt).
29. Povey, H. and Ransom, M., 2000, Some undergraduate students' perceptions of using technology for mathematics: tales of resistance. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 5, 47-63.
30. Australian Education Council, 1991, A National Statement on Mathematics for Australian Schools (Melbourne: Australian Education Council and Curriculum Corporation).
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (Reston, VA: NCTM).
32. Vygotsky, L.S., 1978, Mind in Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
33. Wertsch, J.V., 1985, Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
34. Wertsch, J.V. and Rupert, L.J., 1993, The authority of cultural tools in a sociocultural approach to mediated agency. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 227-239.
35. Brown, C.A., Stein, M.K. and Forman, E.A., 1995, Assisting teachers and students to reform the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 63-93.
36. Forman, E.A., 1996, Learning mathematics as participation in classroom practice: implications of sociocultural theory for educational reform. In: L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin and B. Greer (Eds.) Theories of Mathematical Learning (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 115-130.
37. Goos, M., Galbraith, P. and Renshaw, P., 1999, Establishing a community of practice in a secondary mathematics classroom. In: L. Burton (Ed.) Learning Mathematics: From Hierarchies to Networks (London: Palmer Press), pp. 36-61.
38. Galbraith, P.L., Renshaw, P.R., Goos, M.E. and Geiger, V., 1999, Technology, mathematics, and people: interactions in a community of practice. In: J.M. Truran and K.M. Truran (Eds.) Making the Difference (Proceedings of Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (Sydney: MERGA), pp. 223-230.
39. Resnick, L.B., Pontecorvo, C. and Säljö, R., 1997, Discourse, tools, and reasoning. In: L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo and B. Burge (Eds.) Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), pp. 1-20.
40. Hannafin, R., Burruss, J. and Little, C., 2001, Learning with dynamic geometry programs: perspectives of teachers and learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 132-143.
41. Ramsden, P., 1997, Mathematica in education: old wine in new bottles or a whole new vineyard? Paper presented at the Second International Mathematica Symposium, Rovamiemi, Finland.
42. Shneiderman, B., Borkowski, E., Alavi, M. and Norman, K., 1998, Emergent patterns of teaching/learning in electronic classrooms. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 46, 23-42.
43. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P. and Geiger, V., 2003, Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Matliematical Behavior, 22(1), 73-89.
44. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P. and Geiger, V., 2000, Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 303-320.
45. Forster, P.A., in press, Efficient use of graphics calculators in high school calculus. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 11, 145-164.
46. Lynch, J., 2003, Why have computer-based technologies failed to radically transform schooling? Looking for the right question. Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association (BERA) [online document - http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003272.htm], Edinburgh.