Social organization, grouping, and domestication in fish

Zebrafish

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 141-155

  Wright, D ^a,d   Ward, A J W ^b   Croft, D P ^c   Krause, J ^c  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745532881     PISSN: 15458547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2006.3.141     Document Type: Review

References (162)

1. Krause J, Ruxton G: Living in Groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2002.
2. Shaw E. Schooling fishes. Am Sci 1978;66:166-175.
3. Krakauer DC. Groups confuse predators by exploiting perceptual bottlenecks: a connectionist model of the confusion effect. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1995;36:421-129.
4. Croft DP, Krause J, James R. Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2004;271:516-519.
5. Pitcher TJ. Heuristic definitions of fish shoaling behavior. Anim Behav 1983; 31:611-612.
6. Pavlov DS, Kasumyan AO. Patterns and mechanisms of schooling behavior in fish: a review. J Ichthyol 2000;40(Suppl 2):163-231.
7. Chen MJ, Coss RG, Goldthwaite RO. Timing of dispersal in juvenile jewel fish is unaffected by available space. Dev Psychobiol 1983;16:303-310.
8. Croft DP, Krause J, Couzin ID, Pitcher TJ. When fish shoals meet: outcomes for evolution and fisheries. Fish Fisheries 2003;4:138-146.
9. Powell GVN. Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim Behav 1974;22:501-505.
10. Godin J-G. Group vigilance and shoal size in small characin fish. Behavior 1988;33:120-131.
11. Jakobsson S, Jarvi T. Antipredator behavior of 2-year hatchery reared salmon Salmo salar and a description of the predatory behavior of the burbot Lota lota. Zool Rev 1978;38:57-70.
12. Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ. Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator-evasion behavior In minnow dhoals. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 1987;229:439-465.
13. Breder CM. Studies on social groupings in fishes. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 1959;98:1-27.
14. Krause J, Godin J-G. Predator preferences for attacking particular prey group sizes: consequences for predator hunting success and prey predation Risk. Anim Behav 1995;50:465-473.
15. Welty JLC. Experiments on groups of fishes. Physiol Zool 1934;B7:85-128.
16. Treherne JE, Foster WA. Group transmission of predator avoidance behavior in a marine insect. Anim Behav 1982;32:536-542.
17. Neill SRSJ, Cullen JM. Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behavior of cephalopods and fish predators. J Zool Lond 1974;172:549-569.
18. Milinski M. Can a predator overcome the confusion of swarming prey more easily? Anim Behav 1979;27:1122-1126.
19. Theodorakis CW. Size segregation and the effects of oddity on predation risk in minnow schools. Anim Behav 1989;38:496-502.
20. Landeau L, Terborgh J. Oddity and the confusion effect in predation. Anim Behav 1986;34:1372-1380.
21. Turner GF, Pitcher TJ. Attack abatement: a model for group protection by combined avoidance and dilution. Am Nat 1986;128:228-240.
22. Foster WA, Treherne JE. Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 1981;293:466-467.
23. Godin J-G. Risk of predation and foraging behavior in shoaling banded kilifish (Fundus diaphanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1986;16:105-110.
24. Morgan MJ, Colgan PW. The effect of predator presence on foraging in bluntnose minnows, Pimephales notatus. Environ Biol Fish 1987;20:105-111.
25. Watt PJ, Nottingham SF, Young S. Toad tadpole aggregation behavior: evidence for a predator avoidance function. Anim Behav 1997;54:865-872.
26. Botham MS, Kerfoot CJ, Louka V, Krause J. Predator choice in the field; grouping guppies, Poecilia reticulata, receive more attacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2005;59:181-184.
27. Botham MS, Krause J. Predator preferences for attacking a 'straggler' or a shoal and shoals with 'odd' individuals, in wolf-fish (Hoplias malabaricus). Ethology 2005;111:881-890.
28. Baird TA, Ryer CH, Olla BL. Social enhancement of foraging on an ephemeral food source in juvenile wall-eye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma. Environ Biol Fishes 1991;31:307-311.
29. Ranta E, Lindstrom K. Assortative schooling in three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. Ann Zool Fenn 1990;27:67-75.
30. Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ. Foraging, timidity and shoal size in minnows and goldfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1983;12:147-152.
31. Sackley PG, Kaufman LS. Effect of predation on foraging height in a planktivorous coral reef fish, Chromis nitidia. Copeia 1996;3:726-729.
32. Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK: Functions of shoaling behavior in teleosts. In Behavior Of Teleost Fishes. Pitcher TJ (ed), pp. 363-439, London, Chapman and Hall, 1993.
33. Pitcher TJ, Wyche CJ, Magurran AE. Evidence for position preferences in schooling mackerel. Anim Behav 1982;30:932-934.
34. Ranta E, Kaitala V. School size affects individual feeding success in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Fish Biol 1991;39:733-737.
35. Hamilton IM, Dill LM. Monopolization of food by zebrafish (Danio rerio) increases in risky habitats. Can J Zool 2002;80:2164-2169.
36. Grand TC, Dill LM. The effect of group size on the foraging behavior of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Anim Behav 1999;58:443-451.
37. Johnsson JI. Group size influences foraging effort independent of predation risk: an experimental study on rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 2003;63:863-870.
38. Weihs D. Hydromechanics of fish schooling. Nature 1973;241:290-291.
39. Herskin J, Steffensen JF. Energy savings in sea bass swimming in a school: measurements of tail beat frequency and oxygen consumption at different swimming speeds. J Fish Biol 1998;53:366-376.
40. Svendsen JC, Skov J, Bildsoe M, Steffensen JF. Intra-school positional preference and reduced tail beat frequency in trailing positions in schooling roach under experimental conditions. J Fish Biol 2003;62:834-846.
41. Cote IM, Poulin R. Parasitism and group size in social animals: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 1995;6:159-165.
42. Street NE, Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ. The effects of increasing shoal size on handling time in goldfish, Carassius-Auratus L. J Fish Biol 1984;25:561-566.
43. Krause J. The influence of hunger on shoal size choice by three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. J Fish Biol 1993;43:775-780.
44. Keenleyside MHA. Some aspects of the schooling behavior of fish. Behavior 1955;8:183-248.
45. Magurran AE. Predator inspection behavior In minnow shoals - differences between populations and individuals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1986;19:267-273.
46. Giles N, Huntingford FA. Predation risk and inter-population variation in antipredator behavior in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 1984;32:264-275.
47. Hoare DJ, Couzin ID, Godin J-GJ, Krause J. Context-dependent group-size choice in fish. Anim Behav 2004;67:155-164.
48. Pitcher TJ. Who Dares Wins: The function and evolution of predator inspection behavior in fish shoals. Neth J Zool 1992;42:371-391.
49. Walling CA, Dawnay N, Kazem AJN, Wright J. Predator inspection behavior in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus): body size, local predation pressure and cooperation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2004;56:164-170.
50. Magurran AE. The inheritance and development of minnow antipredator behavior. Anim Behav 1990;39:834-842.
51. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, Shaw PW, Carvalho GR: The behavioral diversity and evolution of guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior (ed), pp. 155-202, San Diego, Academic Press Inc., 1995.
52. Wright D, Rimmer LB, Pritchard VL, Krause J, Butlin RK. Inter- and intra-population variation in shoaling and boldness in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Naturwiss 2003;90:374-377.
53. Kelley JL, Magurran AE. Effects of relaxed predation pressure on visual predator recognition in the guppy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2003;54:225-232.
54. Brown GE, Dreier VM. Predator inspection behavior and attack cone avoidance in a characin fish: the effects of predator diet and prey experience. Anim Behav 2002;63:1175-1181.
55. Brown GE, Magnavacca G. Predator inspection behavior in a characin fish: an interaction between chemical and visual information? Ethology 2003;109:739-750.
56. Brown GE, Zachar MM. Chemical predator inspection in a characin fish (Hemigrammus erythrozonus, characidae, ostariophysi): the effects of mixed predator diets. Ethology 2002;108:451-461.
57. Brown GE, Paige JA, Godin JGJ. Chemically mediated predator inspection behavior in the absence of predator visual cues by a characin fish. Anim Behav 2000;60:315-321.
58. Brown C, Warburton K. Differences in timidity and escape responses between predator-naive and predator-sympatric rainbowfish populations. Ethology 1999;105:491.
59. Budaev SV. Alternative styles in the European wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus: boldness-related schooling tendency. Environ Biol Fishes 1997; 49:71-78.
60. Coleman K, Wilson DS. Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context-specific. Anim Behav 1998;56:927-936.
61. Dugatkin LA, Alfieri MS. Boldness, behavioral inhibition and learning. Ethology Ecol Evol 2003;15:43-19.
62. Csanyi V. Ethological analysis of predator avoidance by the paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis L.) I. recognition and learning of predators. Behavior 1985;92:227-240.
63. Ward AJW, Thomas P, Hart PJB, Krause J. Correlates of boldness in the three-spined stickleback (Gasteros3 teus aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2004;55:561-568.
64. Dugatkin LA, Godin J-G. Prey approaching predators: a cost-benefit perspective. Ann Zool Fenn 1992;29:233-252.
65. Curio E, Klump J, Regelmann K. An anti-predator response in the great tit (Parsus-major) - is it tuned to predator risk? Oecologia 1983;60:83-88.
66. Curio E, Regelmann K. The behavioral dynamics of great tits (Parus major) approaching a predator. J Comp Ethol 1985;9:3-18.
67. Evans JP, Kelley JL, Ramnarine IW. Female behavior mediates male courtship under predation risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2002;52:496-502.
68. Godin J-G, Dugatkin LA. Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1996;93:10262-10267.
69. Dugatkin LA, Alfieri M. Guppies and the tit for tat strategy: preference based on past interaction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1991;28:243-246.
70. Brosnan SF, Earley RL, Dugatkin LA. Observational learning and predator inspection in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 2003;109:823-833.
71. Gomez-Laplaza LM. Social status and investigatory behavior in the angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). Behavior 2002;139:1469-1490.
72. Milinski M, Luthi JH, Eggler R, Parker GA. Cooperation under predation risk: experiments on costs and benefits. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 1997;264:831-837.
73. Dugatkin LA. Tendency to inspect predators predicts mortality risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 1992;3:124-127.
74. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, Shaw PW, Carvalho GR: The behavioral diversity and evolution of guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior (ed), pp. 363-439, San Diego, Academic Press Inc., 1995.
75. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Prentice Hall, 1996.
76. Ruzzante DE, Doyle RW. Evolution of social-behavior in a resource-rich, structured environment - selection experiments with medaka (Oryzias-Latipes). Evolution 1993;47:456-470.
77. Ruzzante DE, Doyle RW. Rapid behavioral-changes in medaka (Oryzias-Latipes) caused by selection for competitive and noncompetitive growth. Evolution 1991;45:1936-1946.
78. Wright D, Nakamichi R, Krause J, Butlin RK. QTL Analysis of behavioral and morphological differentiation between wild and laboratory zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Genet 2006;12:1-14.
79. Robison BD, Rowland W. A potential model system for studying the genetics of domestication: behavioral variation among wild and domesticated strains of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2005;62:2046-2054.
80. Nakamichi R, Ukai Y, Kishino H. Detection of closely linked multiple quantitative trait loci using a genetic algorithm. Genetics 2001;158:463-475.
81. Carlborg O, Andersson L. Use of randomization testing to detect multiple epistatic QTLs. Genet Res 2002;79:175-184.
82. Carlborg O, Andersson L, Kinghorn B. The use of a genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics 2000;155:2003-2010.
83. Flint J. Analysis of quantitative trait loci that influence animal behavior. J Neurobiol 2003;54:46-77.
84. Mather K, Jinks JL: Biometrical Genetics, 3rd Edition. Cambridge, Chapman and Hall, 1982.
85. Krause J, Ward AJW, Jackson AL, Ruxton GD, James R, Currie S. The influence of differential swimming speeds on composition of multi-species fish shoals. J Fish Biol 2005;67:866-872.
86. Krause J, Godin J-GJ. Shoal choice in banded kilifish (Fundulus diaphanus, Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae): the effects of predation risk, fish size, species composition and size of shoals. Ethology 1994;98:128-136.
87. McRobert SP, Bradner J. The influence of body coloration on shoaling preferences in fish. Anim Behav 1998;56:611-615.
88. Ward AJW, Krause J. Body length assortative shoaling in the European minnow, Phoxinus Phoxinus. Anim Behav 2001;62:617-621.
89. Ranta E, Lindstrom K, Peuhkuri N. Size matters when three-spined sticklebacks go to school. Anim Behav 1992;43:160-162.
90. McCann LI, Koehn DJ, Kline NJ. The effects of body size and body markings on nonpolarized schooling behavior of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). J Psychol 1971;79:71-75.
91. Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ. Assortative preference for stripes in danios. Anim Behav 2005;70:1063-1066.
92. McCann LI, Matthews JJ. The effects of lifelong isolation on species identification in zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). Dev Psychobiol 1974;7:159-163.
93. Engeszer R, Ryan MJ. Learned social preference in zebrafish. Curr Biol 2004;14:881-884.
94. Delaney M, Follet C, Ryan N, Lusk-Yablick J, Gerlach G. Social interaction and distribution of female zebrafish (Danio rerio) in a large aquarium. Biol Bull 2002;203:240-241.
95. Ruhl N, McRober SP. The effect of sex and shoal size on shoaling behavior in Danio rerio. J Fish Biol 2005;67:1318-1326.
96. Krause J, Godin J-G. Influence of parasitism on shoal choice in the banded killifish (Fundulud diaphanus). Ethology 1996;102:40-49.
97. Barber J, Walker P, Svensson PA. Behavioral responses to simulated avian predation in female three spined sticklebacks: the effect of experimental Schistocephalus solidus infections. Behavior 2004;141:1425-1440.
98. Barber I, Hoare D, Krause J. Effects of parasites on fish behavior: a review and evolutionary perspective. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 2000;10:131-165.
99. Ward AJW, Duff AJ, Krause J, Barber I. Shoaling behavior of sticklebacks infected with the microsporidian parasite, Glugea anomala. Environ Biol Fish 2005;72:155-160.
100. Ward AJW, Hart PJB. The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish. Fish Fisheries 2003;4:348-358.
101. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE. Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? Anim Behav 1997;53:945-949.
102. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE. Schooling decisions in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are based on familiarity not kin recognition by phenotype matching. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1999;45:437-443.
103. Ward AJW, Hart PJB, Krause J. The effects of habitat- and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav Ecol 2004;15:925-929.
104. Ward AJW, Holbrook RI, Krause J, Hart PJB. Social recognition in sticklebacks: the role of direct experience and habitat cues. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2005;57:575-583.
105. Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smoth RJF. Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows - implications for anti-predator behavior. Can J Zool 1995;73:955-960.
106. Utne-Palm AC, Hart PJB. The effects of familiarity on competitive interactions between three-spined sticklebacks. Oikos 2000; 91:225-232.
107. Krause J, Hoare DJ, Croft D, Lawrence J, Ward AJW, Ruxton GD, et al. Fish shoal composition: mechanisms and constraints. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2000;267:2011-2017.
108. Klimley AP, Holloway CF. School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Marine Biol 1999;133:307-317.
109. Ward AJW, Botham MS, Hoare DJ, James R, Broom M, Godin JGJ, et al. Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the three-spined stickleback. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2002;269:2451-2455.
110. Helfman GS. School fidelity in fishes - the yellow perch pattern. Anim Behav 1984;32:663-672.
111. Hilborn R. Modelling the stability of fish schools: exchange of individual fish between schools of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1991;48:1081-1091.
112. Hoare DJ, Ruxton GD, Godin J-GJ, Krause J. The social organization of free-ranging fish shoals. Oikos 2000;89:546-554.
113. Newman MEJ. The structure and function of complex networks. Siam Review 2003;45:167-256.
114. Abramson G, Kuperman M. Social games in a social network. Phys Rev E 2001;6303:art. no. 030901.
115. Latora V, Marchiori M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys Rev Lett 2001;8719:art. no.198701.
116. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 1998;393:440-442.
117. Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Bowers JA, Hay CT, Hofmeyr M, Getz WM. Integrating association data and disease dynamics in a social ungulate: bovine tuberculosis in African buffalo in the Kruger National Park. Ann Zool Fenn 2004;41:879-892.
118. Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS. Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 2003;59:147-167.
119. Albert R, Barabási AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 2002;74:47-97.
120. Lusseau D. The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2003;270(Suppl. 2):S186-S188.
121. Price EO. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q Rev Biol 1984;59:1-32.
122. Darwin C: The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. London, John Murray, 1868.
123. Darwin C: The Origin of Species. New York, Mentor, 1859.
124. Glutton-Brock J. Man-made dogs. Science 1977;197:1340-1342.
125. Price EO. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999;65:245-271.
126. Wood-Gush DGM, Vestergaard K. Exploratory behavior and the welfare of intensively kept animals. J Agric Ethics 1989;2:161-169.
127. Koide T, Moriwaki K, Ikeda K, Niki H, Shiroishi T. Multi-phenotype behavioral characterization of inbred strains derived from wild stocks of Mus musculus. Mamm Genome 2000;11:664-670.
128. Hill D, Robertson P. Breeding success of wild and hand-reared ring-necked pheasants. J Wildlife Manag 1988;52:446-450.
129. Olla BL, Davis MW. The role of learning and stress in predator avoidance of hatchery and wild steelhead trout (Ohncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 1989;76:209-214.
130. Lucas MD, Drew RE, Wheeler PA, Verrell PA, Thorgaard GH. Behavioral differences among rainbow trout clonal lines. Behav Genet 2004;34:355-365.
131. Berejikian BA. The effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and experience on the relative ability of steelhead trout fry (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to avoid a benthic predator. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1995;52:2476-2482.
132. Johnsson J, Petersson E, Jonsson E, Bjornsson B, Jarvi T. Domestication and growth hormone alter antipredator behavior and growth patterns in juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1996;53:1546-1554.
133. Swain DP, Riddell BE. Variation in agonistic behavior between newly emerged juveniles from hatchery and wild populations of coho dalmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1990;47:566-571.
134. Fleming IA, Einum S. Experimental tests of genetic divergence of farmed from wild Atlantic salmon due to domestication. ICES J Marine Sci 1997;54:1051-1063.
135. Price EO, King JA: Domestication and adaptation. In: Adaptation of Domestic Animals. Hafez ESE (ed), pp. 34-45, Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1968.
136. Beaumont C, Roussot O, Marissal-Avry N, Mormede P, Prunet P, Roubertoux P. Genetique et adaptation des animaux d'elevage: introduction. INRA Prod Anim 2002;15:343-348.
137. Belyaev DK. Destabilizing selection as a factor of domestication. J Hered 1979;70:301-308.
138. Marliave JB, Gergits WF, Aota S. F10 pandalid shrimp: sex determination; DNA and dopamine as indicators of domestication and outcrossing for wild pigmentation pattern. Zoo Biol 1993;12:435-451.
139. Fevolden SE, Refstie T, Roed KH. Selection for high and low cortisol stress response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 1991;95:53-65.
140. Spurway H. The causes of domestication: an attempt to integrate some ideas of Konrad Lorenz with evolution theory. J Genet 1955;53:325-362.
141. King HD, Donaldson HH. Life processes and size of the body and organs of the gray Norway rat during ten generations in captivity. Am Anat Mem 1929;14:1-106.
142. Kawahara T, Mita A, Saito M, Sugimoto N. Genetic changes in Japanese wild quails under domestic conditions. Ann Rep Nat Instit Genet Jpn 1974;24:72.
143. Kronenberger J-P, Medioni J. Food neophobia in wild and laboratory cice (Mus musculus domesticus). Behav Processes 1985;11:53-59.
144. Lankin V. Factors of diversity of domestic behavior in sheep. Genet Sel Evol 1997;29:73-92.
145. Bonhomme F, Guenet J-L: The laboratory mouse and its wild relatives. In Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. Lyon MF, Rastan S, Brown SDM (ed), 1577-1596, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984.
146. Flint J, Mott R. Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Genet 2001;2:437-445.
147. Gibson G, Weir B. The quantitative genetics of transcription. Trends Genet 2005;21:616-623.
148. Larson ET, O'Malley DM, Melloni RH Jr. Aggression and vasotosin are associated with dominant-subordinate relationships in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res 2006;167:94-102.
149. Nadeau JH, Frankel WN. The roads from phenotypic variation to gene discovery: mutagenesis versus QTLs. Nature Genetics 2000;25:381-384.
150. Tully T. Discovery of genes involved with learning and memory: an experimental synthesis of hirschian and benzerian perspectives. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1996;93:13460-13467.
151. Sawyer LA, Hennessy JM, Pexioto AA, Kyriacou P. Natural variation in a Drosophila clock gene and temperature compensation. Science 1997;278:2117-2120.
152. Coates JC, de Bono M. Antagonistic pathways in neurons exposed to body fluid regulate social feeding in C. elegans. Nature 2002;419:925-929.
153. de Bono M, Bargmann CI. Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans. Cell 1998; 94:679-689.
154. de Bono M, Tobin DM, Davis MW, Avery L, Bargmann CI. Social feeding in C. elegans is induced by neurons that detect aversive stimuli. Nature 2002;419:899-903.
155. de Belle JS, Sokolowksi MB. Genetic localization of foraging (for): a major gene for larval behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1989;123:157-163.
156. Osborne KA, Robichon A, Burgess E, Butland S, Shaw RA, Coulthard A, et al. Natural behavior polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. Science 1997;277:834-836.
157. Sokolowski MB. Genes for normal behavioral variation: Recent clues from flies and worms. Neuron 1998;21:463-466.
158. Darland T, Dowling JE. Behavioral screening for cocaine sensitivity in mutagenized zebrafish. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2001;98:11691-11696.
159. Baier H. Zebrafish on the move: towards a behavior-genetic analysis of vertebrate vision. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000;10:451-455.
160. Neuhass SC. Genetic disorders of vision revealed by a behavioral screen of 400 essential loci in zebrafish. J Neurosci 1999;19:8603-8615.
161. Lorent K. The zebrafish space cadet gene controls axonal pathfinding of neurons that modulate fast turning movements. Development 2001;128:2131-2142.
162. Granato M. Genes controlling and mediating locomotion behavior of the zebrafish embryo and larvae. Development 1996;123:399-413.