The complete genome sequence of a dog: A perspective

BioEssays

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 569-573

  Lee, Soohyun ^a   Kasif, Simon ^a,b,c  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

^c HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ALLELE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BREEDING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; EVOLUTION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENOME; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PATERNAL BEHAVIOR; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; GENOME; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY;

CANIS FAMILIARIS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 33745089935     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20421     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, et al. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438:803-819.
2. Wayne RK, Ostrander EA. 2004. Out of the dog house: the emergence of the canine genome. Heredity 92:273-274.
3. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291:1304-1351.
4. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921.
5. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420:520-562.
6. Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. 2005. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437:69-87.
7. Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Metzker ML, Muzny DM, Sodergren EJ, et al. 2004. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 428:493-521.
8. Parra G, Agarwal P, Abril JF, Wiehe T, Fickett JW, et al. 2003. Comparative gene prediction in human and mouse. Genome Res 13:108-117.
9. Zhang L, Pavlovic V, Cantor CR, Kasif S. 2003. Human-mouse gene identification by comparative evidence integration and evolutionary analysis. Genome Res 13:1190-1202.
10. Wasserman WW, Palumbo M, Thompson W, Fickett JW, Lawrence CE. 2000. Human-mouse genome comparisons to locate regulatory sites. Nat Genet 26:225-228.
11. Kirkness EF, Bafna V, Halpern AL, Levy S, Remington K, et al. 2003. The dog genome: survey sequencing and comparative analysis. Science 301:1898-1903.
12. Springer MS, Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, O'Brien SJ. 2003. Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1056-1061.
13. Dorus S, Vallender EJ, Evans PD, Anderson JR, Gilbert SL, et al. 2004. Accelerated evolution of nervous system genes in the origin of Homo sapiens. Cell 119:1027-1040.
14. Pennisi E. 2002. Canine evolution. A shaggy dog history. Science 298:1540-1542.
15. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M. 2002. The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634-1636.
16. Kukekova AV, Trut LN, Oskina IN, Kharlamova AV, Shikhevich SG, et al. 2004. A marker set for construction of a genetic map of the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes). J Hered 95:185-194.
17. Vila C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, et al. 1997. Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276:1687-1689.
18. Wayne RK. 1993. Molecular evolution of the dog family. Trends Genet 9:218-224.
19. Savolainen P, Zhang YP, Luo J, Lundeberg J, Leitner T. 2002. Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298:1610-1613.
20. Leonard JA, Wayne RK, Wheeler J, Valadez R, Guillen S, et al. 2002. Ancient DNA evidence for Old World origin of New World dogs. Science 298(5598):1613-1616.
21. Vila C, Maldonado JE, Wayne RK. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships, evolution, and genetic diversity of the domestic dog. J Hered 90:71-77.
22. Bruford MW, Bradley DG, Luikart G. 2003. DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat Rev Genet 4:900-910.
23. Wayne RK, Geffen E, Girman DJ, Koepfli KP, Lau LM, et al. 1997. Molecular systematics of the Canidae. Syst Biol 46:622-653.
24. Parker HG, Kim LV, Sutter NB, Carlson S, Lorentzen TD, et al. 2004. Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science 304:1160-1164.
25. Rosenberg NA, Nordborg M. 2002. Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 3:380-390.
26. Sutter NB, Ostrander EA. 2004. Dog star rising: the canine genetic system. Nat Rev Genet 5:900-910.
27. Sutter NB, Eberle MA, Parker HG, Pullar BJ, Kirkness EF, et al. 2004. Extensive and breed-specific linkage disequilibrium in Canis familiaris. Genome Res 14:2388-2396.
28. Chase K, Carrier DR, Adler FR, Jarvik T, Ostrander EA, et al. 2002. Genetic basis for systems of skeletal quantitative traits: principal component analysis of the canid skeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9930-9935.
29. Lin L, Faraco J, Li R, Kadotani H, Rogers W, et al. 1999. The sleep disorder canine narcolepsy is caused by a mutation in the hypocretin (orexin) receptor 2 gene. Cell 98:365-376.
30. Moe L, Lium B. 1997. Hereditary multifocal renal cystadenocarcinomas and nodular dermatofibrosis in 51 German shepherd dogs. J Small Anim Pract 38:498-505.
31. Acland GM, Ray K, Mellersh CS, Gu W, Langston AA, et al. 1998. Linkage analysis and comparative mapping of canine progressive rodcone degeneration (prcd) establishes potential locus homology with retinitis pigmentosa (RP17) in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:3048-3053.
32. Wang W, Kirkness EF. 2005. Short interspersed elements (SINEs) are a major source of canine genomic diversity. Genome Res 15:1798-1808.
33. Margulies EH, Vinson JP, Miller W, Jaffe DB, Lindblad-Toh K, et al. 2005. An initial strategy for the systematic identification of functional elements in the human genome by low-redundancy comparative sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4795-4800.
34. Lee S, Kohane I, Kasif S. 2005. Genes involved in complex adaptive processes tend to have highly conserved upstream regions in mammalian genomes. BMC Genomics 6:168.
35. Kamal M, Xie X, Lander ES. 2006. A large family of ancient repeat elements in the human genome is under strong selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [In press].
36. Xie X, Lu J, Kulbokas EJ, Golub TR, Mootha V, et al. 2005. Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3′ UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature 434:338-345.