Ownership preferences, competitive heterogeneity, and family-controlled businesses

Family Business Review

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 89-101

  Hoopes, David G ^a   Miller, Danny ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745049911     PISSN: 08944865     EISSN: 17416248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00064.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allouche, J., & Amann, B. (1997). Le retour de Capitalisme Familiale, L'expansion: Management Review, 85, 92-99.
2. Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1999). Does corporate ownership structure affect corporate diversification? Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1063-1069.
3. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S., & Reeb, D. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 263-285.
4. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance; Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
5. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 209-237.
6. Becker, G. (1974). A theory of social interaction. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063-1093.
7. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: MacMillan.
8. Bhattacharya, U., & Ravikumar, B. (2001). Capital markets and the evolution of family businesses. Journal of Business, 74, 187-219.
9. Bornstein, P. (1983). All in the family. Forbes, 132, 152-153.
10. Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 693-728.
11. Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58, 2167-2202.
12. Chandler, A. (1990). Scale and scope. New York: Free Press.
13. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J., & Lang, L. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57, 2741-2771.
14. Colli, A. (2003). The history of family business: 1850-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professional managed firms. Family Business Review, 5(2), 17-36.
16. Davis, J., Schoorman, R., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Towards a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
17. De Geus, A. (1997). The living company. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Demsetz H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law & Economics 26(2), 375-390.
19. Demsetz H. (1988). Ownership, control, and the firm. Oxford/New York: Blackwell.
20. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 11-55.
21. Dieryckx, I., & Cool, K. (1991). Assets stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504-1511.
22. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983a). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(2), 301-325.
23. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983b). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 325-344.
24. Froot, K. A., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1992). Herd on the street: Informational inefficiencies in a market with short-term speculation. Journal of Finance, 47, 1461-1484.
25. Gallo, M., & Vilaseca, A. (1996). Finance in family business. Family Business Review, 9, 387-401.
26. Gomez-Mejia, L., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81-95.
27. Heck, R., & Trent, E. (1999). The prevalence of family business from a household sample. Family Business Review, 12, 209-224.
28. Helfat, C. E. (2000). Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 955-959.
29. Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T., & Walker, G. (2003). Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 889-902.
30. Jacobs, M. T. (1991). Short-term America: The causes and cures of our business myopia. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31. James, H. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41-55.
32. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
33. Kang, D. (1996). The impact of ownership type on organization performance. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
34. Kang, D. (2000). Family ownership and performance in public corporations: A study of the U.S. fortune 500, 1982-1994. Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
35. Khanna, T. (2000). Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets. European Economic Review 44(4-6), 748-761
36. Kleiman, R., Lange, J., Leleux, B., Petty, W., & Shulman, J. (1996). An index of family controlled publicly traded companies. Boston, MA: Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research, Babson College.
37. Knott, A. M., Bryce, D., & Posen, H. (2003). On the strategic accumulation of intangible assets. Organization Science, 14(2), 192-207.
38. Knott, A. M., & McKelvey, B. (1999). Nirvana efficiency: A comparative test of residual claims and routines. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 365-383.
39. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
40. Laverty, K. J. (1996). Economic "short-termism": The debate, the unresolved issues, and implications for management. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 825-860.
41. Lee, J., & Miller, D. (1999). People matter: Commitment to employees, strategy and performance in Korean enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 579-593.
42. Lubatkin, M., Ling, Y., & Schulze, W. (2002). Fairness in family firms. Working Paper, Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
43. Mackie, R. (2001). Family ownership & business survival. Business History, 43, 1-32.
44. Makadok, R. (in press). Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: Why the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Strategic Management Journal.
45. McConaughy, D., Matthews, C., & Fialco, A. (2001). Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk & value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 31-49.
46. McGahan, A. M., & Porter, M. E. (1999). The persistence of shocks to profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(1), 143-153
47. Miller, D. (2003). An asymmetry-based view of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 961-976.
48. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). The challenges and advantages of family business. Strategic Organization, 1, 27-34.
49. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2004). Managing for the long run. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
50. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R., & Cannella, A. (2005). Family involvement, agency and performance in the Fortune 1000. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings Hawaii.
51. Miller, D., & Lee, J. (2001). The people make the process. Journal of Management, 27, 163-189.
52. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1988). Management ownership and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
53. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Entrepreneurial control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 391-410.
54. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 187-221.
55. Rumelt, R. P. (1987). Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 137-158). New York: Harper & Row.
56. Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 167-185.
57. Rumelt, R. P. (1995). Inertia and transformation. In C. A. Montgomery (Ed.), Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis (pp. 101-132). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic.
58. Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M., & Dino, R. (2003a). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473-490.
59. Schulze, W., Lubatikin, M., & Dino, R. (2003b). Dispersion of ownership and agency in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.
60. Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M., Dino, R., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
61. Silverman, B. (1999). Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification. Management Science, 45, 1109-1125.
62. Teece, D. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 39-63.
63. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
64. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2004). How do family ownership, management and control affect firm value. Working Paper. Department of Finance, Harvard Business School.
65. Ward, J. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
66. Weber, J., Lavelle, T., Lowry, T., Zellner, W., & Barrett, A. (2003). Family Inc. Business Week, November 10, 100-114.
67. Williamson, O. E (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1087-1108.
68. Winter, S. (1988). On coase, competence and the corporation. In O. E. Williamson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution, and development. New York: Oxford University Press.