DSC perfusion MRI - Quantification and reduction of systematic errors arising in areas of reduced cerebral blood flow

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1342-1349

  Carpenter, Trevor K ^a,b   Armitage, Paul A ^a   Bastin, Mark E ^a   Wardlaw, Joanna M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cerebral perfusion; Cerebrovascular disease; Deconvolution; MRI; Singular value decomposition; Stroke

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; DECONVOLUTION; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS;

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; CEREBRAL PERFUSION; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; REDUCTION OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS; REGULARIZATION PARAMETERS; STROKE; TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN PERFUSION; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DECOMPOSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STROKE; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

EID: 33744954888     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20908     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sobetsky J, Zaro Weber O, Lehnhardt F-G, Hesselmann V, Thiel A, Dohmen C, Jacobs A, Neveling M, Heiss W-D. Which time to peak threshold best identifies penumbral flow? A comparison of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke 2004;35:2843-2847.
2. Butcher KS, Macgregor L, Parsons MW, Barber PA, Levi C, Chalk J, Read S, Schutz D, Kimber T, Bladin C, Fink J, Desmond P, Tress B, Donnan G, Davis S. Multiple definitions of PWI-DWI mismatch reliably predict infarct growth. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Stroke Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 2004. p 40.
3. Yamada K, Wu O, Gonzalez RG, Bakker D, Østergaard L, Copen WA, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR, Yagi K, Nishimura T, Sorensen AG. Magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging of acute cerebral infarction effect of the calculation methods and underlying vasculopathy. Stroke 2002;33:87-94.
4. Grandin CB, Duprez T, Smith AM, Mataigne F, Oppenheim C, Peelers A, Cosnard G. Which MR-derived perfusion parameters are the best predictors of infarct growth in hyperacute stroke? Comparative study between relative and quantitative measurements. Radiology 2002;223:361-370.
5. Perthen JE, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Is quantification of bolus tracking MRI reliable without deconvolution? Magn Reson Med 2002;47:61-67.
6. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954;6:731-745.
7. Zierler KL. Equations for measuring blood flow by external monitoring of radioisotopes. Circ Res 1965;16:309-321.
8. Kiselev VG. On the theoretical basis of perfusion measurements by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:1113-1122.
9. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magentic resonance imaging in stroke assumptions, limitations, and potential implications for clinical use. Stroke 2002;33:1146-1151.
10. Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
11. Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:726-736.
12. Chen JJ, Fravne R, Smith MR. Reassessing the clinical efficacy of two MR quantitative DSC PWI CBF algorithms following cross-calibration with PET images. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:1251-1263.
13. Clough A, Cui D, Linehan JH, Krenz GS, Dawson C.A, Maron MB. Model-free numerical deconvolution of recirculating indicator concentration curves. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:1444-1453.
14. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gueckel Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637-641.
15. Gobbel GT, Fike JR. A deconvolution method for evaluating indicator-dilution curves. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1833-1854.
16. Smith AM, Grandin CB, Duprez T, Mataigne F, Cosnard G. Whole brain quantitative CBF and CBV measurements using MRI bolus tracking: comparison of methodologies. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:559-564.
17. Lu H, Smith MR, Frayne R. Quantitative MR cerebral blood flow using ARMA-based deconvolution: preliminary results. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2002. p 1171-1176.
18. Andersen IK, Symkowiak A, Rasmussen CE, Hanson LG, Marstrand JR, Larsson HBW, Hansen LK. Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:351-361.
19. Liu H, Yonglin P, Liu Y, Nickerson L, Andrews T, Fox PT, Gao J. Cerebral blood flow measurement by dynamic contrast MRI using singular value decomposition with an adaptive threshold. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:167-172.
20. Wu O, Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
21. Smith MR, Lu H, Trochet S, Frayne R. Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artefacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:631-634.
22. Murase K, Yamazaki Y, Shinohara M. Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:3147-3159.
23. Sourbron S, Luypaert R, Van Schuerbeek P, Dujardin M, Stadnik T. Choice of the regularization parameter for perfusion quantification with MRI. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:3307-3324.
24. Sourbron S, Luypaert R, Van Schuerbeek P, Dujardin M, Stadnik T, Osteaux M. Deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data by linear inversion: choice of the regularization parameter. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:209-213.
25. Astrup J, Siesjo BK, Symon L. Thresholds in cerebral ischaemia: the ischaemic penumbra. Stroke 1981;12:723-725.
26. Wirestam R, Andersson L, Østergaard L, Bolling M, Aunola J, Lindgren A, Geijer B, Holtås S, Ståhlberg F. Assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using different deconvolution techniques. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:691-700.
27. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466-473.
28. Butcher K, Parsons M, Baird T, Barber A, Donnan G, Desmond P, Tress B, Davis S. Perfusion thresholds in acute stroke thrombolysis. Stroke 2003;34:2159-2164.