Comparison of multistation MR angiography with integrated parallel acquisition technique versus conventional technique with a dedicated phased-array coil system in peripheral vascular disease

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 263-269

  Hagspiel, Klaus D ^a   Yao, Luke ^a   Shih, Ming Chen Paul ^a   Burkholder, Brian ^a   Bissonette, Eric ^a   Harthun, Nancy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIS; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THIGH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; LEG; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICAL MODEL; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEG; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 33646947185     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000195401.80209.6B     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:683-692.
2. Leiner T, Ho KY, Nelemans PJ, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MoBI-track) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:368-377.
3. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, et al. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1127-1135.
4. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K, et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23:583-589.
5. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211:59-67.
6. Bezooijen R, van den Bosch HCM, Tielbeek AV, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: sensitivity-encoded multiposition MR angiography compared with intraarterial angiography and conventional multiposition MR angiography. Radiology 2004; 231:263-271.
7. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and boluschase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:170-177.
8. Meissner OA, Rieger J, Weber C, et al. Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA. Radiology 2005; 235:308
9. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:345-351.
10. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multi-injection time-resolved MR angiography - initial results. Radiology 2001; 221:266-272.
11. Khilnani NM, Winchester PA, Prince MR, et al. Peripheral vascular disease: combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with x-ray angiography for treatment planning. Radiology 2002; 224:63-74.
12. Zhang HL, Khilnani NM, Prince MR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography for symptomatic infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:938-947.
13. Huber A, Scheidler J, Wintersperger B, et al. Moving-table MR angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels: comparison of body coil and dedicated phased array coil systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:1365-1373.
14. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:671-677.
15. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower position submillimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:484-491.
16. van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2003; 46:3-27.
17. Goldfarb JW, Holland AE. Parallel magnetic resonance imaging using coils with localized sensitivities. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22:1025-1029.
18. Pruessmann KP, Welger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:952-962.
19. Zhang HL, Khilnani NM, Prince MR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography for symptomatic infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:1041-1047.
20. De Vries M, Nijenhuis RJ, Hoogeveen RM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple station: feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21:37-45.