Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning

Psychological Research

Volumn 60, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 53-71

  Schmidtke, V ^b   Heuer, H ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001884642     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00419680     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 251-272.
2. Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17-30.
3. Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 189-202.
4. Damos, D. (1991). Dual-task methodology: Some common problems. In: D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-task performance. (pp. 101-119) London: Taylor & Francis.
5. Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567-584.
6. Goschke, T. (1994, March) Prozedurales Lernen von strukturierten Ereignissequenzen. Paper presented at the workshop "Sequenzlernen, Bewußsein und Aufmerksamkeit", Schwerte, Germany.
7. Hay, J. C., & Goldsmith, W. M. (1973). Space-time adaptation of visual position constancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 1-9.
8. Hayes, N., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Two modes of learning for interactive tasks. Cognition, 28, 249-276.
9. Held, R., Efstathiou, A., & Greene, M. (1966). Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 887-891.
10. Heuer, H. (1985). Some points of contact between models of central capacity and factor analytic models. Acta Psychologica, 60, 135-155.
11. Heuer, H. (1996) Doppeltätigkeiten. In: O. Neumann & A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie C II 2: Aufmerksamkeit (pp. 163-218). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
12. Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (1996). Secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 59, 119-133.
13. Heuer, H., Schmidt, R. A., & Ghodsian, D. (1995). Generalized motor programs for rapid bimanual tasks: A two-level multiplicative-rate model. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 343-356.
14. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
15. Keele, S. W., & Jennings, P. J. (1992). Attention in the representation of sequence: Experiment and theory. Human Movement Science, 11, 125-138.
16. Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 350-364.
17. McLeod, P. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.
18. Navon, D. (1984). Resources - A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
19. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements for learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 1987, 1-32.
20. Nissen, M. J., Knopman, D. S., & Schacter, C. L. (1987). Neurochemical dissociation of memory systems. Neurology, 37, 789-794.
21. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
22. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
23. Perruchet, P., & Amorim, M. -A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 785-800.
24. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
25. Reber, A. S. (1992). The cognitive unconscious: An evolutionary perspective. Consciousness & Cognition, 1, 93-133.
26. Reed, J. & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 584-594.
27. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
28. Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674-685.
29. Welch, R. B. (1978). Perceptual modification: Adapting to altered sensory environments. New York: Academic Press.
30. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1047-1060.
31. Zießler, M. (1994). The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 57, 30-41.