The evolution of hybrid infertility: Perpetual coevolution between gender-specific and sexually antagonistic genes

Genetica

Volumn 116, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 179-188

  Rice, William R ^a   Chippindale, Adam K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Genomic conflict; Hybrid infertility; Sex specific genes; Sexual antagonism; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INFERTILITY; Y CHROMOSOME;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0036874542     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021205130926     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Alvesalo, L., 1997. Sex chromosomes and human growth - a dental approach. Hum. Genet. 101: 1-5.
2. Arnqvist, G. & L. Rowe, 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes - a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 261: 123-127.
3. Bull, J.J., 1983. Evolution of Sex Determination Systems. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, California.
4. Chapman, T., F. Lindsay, F. Liddle, J.M. Kalb, M.F. Wolfner & L. Partridge, 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241-244.
5. Chen, P.S., 1996. The accessory gland proteins in male Drosophila: structural, reproductive, and evolutionary aspects. Experientia 52: 503-510.
6. Chippindale, A.K., J.R. Gibson & W.R. Rice, 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1671-1675.
7. Chippindale, A.K. & W.R. Rice, 2001. Y chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5677-5682.
8. Civetta, A. & R.S. Singh, 1995. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J. Mol. Evol. 41: 1085-1095.
9. Clark, A.G., 1987. Variation in Y-chromosome segregation in natural-populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 115: 143-151.
10. Clark, A.G. & E.M.S. Lyckegaard, 1990. 2 neutrality tests of Ylinked rDNA variation in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 44: 2106-2112.
11. Eberhard, W.G., 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
12. Endler, J.A., 1980. Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34: 76-91.
13. Forsman, A., 1995. Opposing fitness consequences of color pattern in male and female snakes. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 53-70.
14. Haig, D., 1993. Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Quart. Rev. Biol. 68: 495-531.
15. Haig, D. & C. Graham, 1991. Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor-ii receptor. Cell 64: 1045-1046.
16. Hurst, L.D., 1992. Intragenomic conflict as an evolutionary force. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 247: 189-194.
17. Howard, D.J., M. Reece, P.G. Gregory, J. Chu & M.L. Caim, 1998. The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms, pp. 279-290 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
18. Jiang, M., J. Ryu, M. Kiraly, K. Duke, V. Reinke & S.K. Kim, 2001. Genome-wide analysis of developmental and sex-regulated gene expression profiles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 218-223.
19. Jin, W., R.M. Riley, R.D. Wolfinger. K.P. White, G. Passador-Gurgel & G. Gibson, 2001. The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 29: 389-395.
20. Kohorn, L.U., 1994. Shoot morphology and reproduction in jojoba: advantages of sexual reproduction. Ecology 75: 2384-2394.
21. Lindsley, D.L. & E.H. Grell, 1968. Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington D.C.
22. Maynard Smith, J., 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, New York.
23. Meagher, T.R., 1992. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). 1. Genetic variation. Evolution 46: 445-457.
24. Orgad, S.G., Rosenfeld, R.J. Greenspan & D. Segal, 2000. Courtless, the Drosophila UBC7 homolog, is involved in male courtship behavior and spermatogenesis. Genetics 155: 1267-1280.
25. Ostrer, H., 2001. Genome and hormones: gender differences in physiology - invited review: sex-based differences in gene expression. J. Appl. Physiol. 91: 2384-2388.
26. Palumbi, S.R., 1998. Speciation and the evolution of gamete recognition loci, pp. 271-278 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Parker, G.A., 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict, pp. 123-166 in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, edited by M.S. Blum & N.A. Blum. Academic Press, New York.
28. Parker, G.A. & L. Partridge, 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser.-B Biol. Sci. 353: 261-274.
29. Partridge, L., K. Fowler, S. Trevitt & W. Sharp, 1986. An examination of the effects of males on the survival and egg-production rates of female Drosophila-melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 32: 925-929.
30. Pitnick, S. & G.T. Miller, 2000. Correlated response in reproductive and life history traits to selection on testis length in Drosophila hydei. Heredity 84: 416-426.
31. Rice, W.R., 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
32. Rice, W.R., 1986. On the instability of polygenic sex determination: the effect of sex-specific selection. Evolution 40: 633-639.
33. Rice, W.R., 1987. The accumulation of sexually antagonistic genes as a selective agent promoting the evolution of reduced recombination between primitive sex chromosomes. Evolution 41: 911-914.
34. Rice, W.R., 1992. Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science 256: 1436-1439.
35. Rice, W.R., 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 361: 232-234.
36. Rice, W.R., 1998a. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation, pp. 261-270 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. Rice, W.R., 1998b. Male fitness increases when females eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6217-6221.
38. Rice, W.R. & B. Holland, 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 1-10.
39. Rice, W.R. & A.K. Chippindale, 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 685-693.
40. Rinchik, E.M., D.A. Carpenter & M.A. Handel, 1995. Pleiotropy in microdeletion syndromes - neurologic and spermatogenic abnormalities in mice homozygous for the P(6H) deletion are likely due to dysfunction of a single-gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 6394-6398.
41. Roldan, E.R.S. & M. Gomendio, 1999. The Y chromosome as a battleground for sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 58-62.
42. Sasaki, A. & G. de Jong, 1999. Density dependence and unpredictable selection in a heterogeneous environment: compromise and polymorphism in the ESS reaction norm Evolution 53: 1329-1342.
43. Schoener, T.W., J.B. Slade & C.H. Stinson, 1982. Diet and sexual dimorphism in the very catholic lizard genus, Leiocephalus of the Bahamas. Oecologia 53: 160-169.
44. Sherman, P.W., 1977. Nepotism and evolution of alarm calls. Science 197: 1246-1253.
45. Singh, R.S. & R.J. Kulathinal, 2000. Sex gene pool evolution and speciation: a new paradigm Genes. Genet. Syst. 75: 119-130.
46. Slatkin, M. & J. Maynard Smith, 1979. Models of coevolution. Quart. Rev. Biol. 54: 233-263.
47. Stenseth, N.C. & J. Maynard Smith, 1984. Coevolution in ecosystems - red queen evolution or stasis. Evolution 38: 870-880.
48. Swanson, W.J., A.G. Clark, H.M. Waldrip-Dail, M.F. Wolfner & C.F. Aquadro, 2001. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 7375-7379.
49. Toro, M.A. & B. Charlesworth, 1982. An attempt to detect genetic-variation in sex-ratio in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 49: 199-209.
50. Trivers, R.L., 1974. Parent-offspring conflict. Am. Zool. 14: 249-264.
51. True, J.R., B.S. Weir & C.V.C. Laurie, 1996. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142: 819-837.
52. Vacquier, V.D., 1998. Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science 28: 1995-1998.
53. Van Valen, L., 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory 1: 1-30.
54. West-Eberhard, M., 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58: 155-183.
55. Wolfner, M.F., 1997. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products Insect. Biochem. Mol. 27: 179-192.
56. Wu, C.-I. & A.W. Davis, 1993. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation - the composite nature of Haldane rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142: 187-212.
57. Wu, C.-I. & M.F. Palopoli, 1994. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Ann. Rev. Genet. 28: 283-308.
58. Wyckoff, G.J., W. Wang & C.-I. Wu, 2000. Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature 403: 304-309.