The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict

Nature

Volumn 423, Issue 6943, 2003, Pages 979-982

  Martin, Oliver Y ^a   Hosken, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY;

ALLOPATRIC POPULATIONS;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

EVOLUTION; ISOLATED POPULATION; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; FLY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MATING; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ARACHNIDA; HEXAPODA;

ANIMALS; DIPTERA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 0037774652     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01752     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lande, R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic characters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725 (1981).
2. Gavrilets, S. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403, 886-889 (2000).
3. Tregenza, T., Butlin, R. K. & Wedell, N. Sexual conflict and speciation. Nature 407, 149-150 (2000).
4. Rice, W. R. & Hostert, E. E. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47, 1637-1653 (1993).
5. Price, T. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 251-260 (1998).
6. Parker, G. A. in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. B.) 123-166 (Academic, New York, 1979).
7. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 1-10 (1997).
8. Swanson, W. J. & Vacquier, V. D. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 137-144 (2002).
9. Rice, W. R. in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (eds Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H.) 261-270 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).
10. Schluter, D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).
11. Rice. W. R. Dangerous liaisons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12953-12955 (2000).
12. Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10460-10464 (2000).
13. Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. A., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2309-2316 (2002).
14. Sharp, P. M. The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106, 601-612 (1984).
15. Meffert, L. M. & Bryant, E. H. Mating propensity and courtship behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 45, 293-306 (1991).
16. Meffert, L. M. & Bryant, E. H. Divergent ambulatory and grooming behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 46, 1399-1407 (1992).
17. Cooper, T. F., Rozen, D. E. & Lenski, R. E. Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1072-1077 (2003).
18. Andrés, J. A. & Morrow, E. H. The origin of interlocus sexual conflict: is sex linkage important? J. Evol. Biol. 16, 219-223 (2003).
19. Parker, G. A. Reproductive behaviour of Sepsis cynipsea (L.) (Diptera: Sepsidae) I. A preliminary analysis of the reproductive strategy and its associated behaviour patterns. Behaviour 41, 172-206 (1972).
20. Parker, G. A. Reproductive behaviour of Sepsis cynipsea (L.) (Diptera: Sepsidae) II. The significance of the precopulatory passive phase and emigration. Behaviour 41, 242-250 (1972).
21. Ward, P. I., Hemmi, J. & Röösli, T. Sexual conflict in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Funct. Ecol. 6, 649-653 (1992).
22. Blanckenhorn, W. U. et al. The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav. Ecol. 13, 353-358 (2002).
23. Martin, O. Y. & Hosken, D. J. Strategic ejaculation in the common dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Anim. Behav. 63, 541-546 (2002).
24. Martin, O. Y., Leugger, R. R., Zeltner, N. & Hosken, D. J. Male age, mating probability and mating costs in the fly Sepsis cynipsea. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5, 119-129 (2003).
25. Blanckenhorn, W. U., Mühlhäuser, C., Morf, C., Reusch, T. & Reuter, M. Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Ethology 106, 577-593 (2000).
26. Hosken, D. J., Martin, O. Y., Born, J. & Huber, F. Sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea: female reluctance, fertility and mate choice. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 485-490 (2003).
27. Mühlhäuser, C. & Blanckenhorn, W. U. The costs of avoiding matings in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav. Ecol. 13, 359-365 (2002).
28. Ding, A. & Blanckenhorn, W. U. The effect of sexual size dimorphism on mating behaviour in two dung flies with contrasting dimorphism. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 259-273 (2002).