Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 568-575

  Linder, J E ^a   Rice, W R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Interlocus conflict; Interlocus contest evolution; Sexual conflict; Sexually antagonistic coevolution

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; NATURAL SELECTION; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

AGGRESSION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

AGGRESSION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HAPLOTYPES; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 18544363280     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00872.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arnqvist, G. 1989. Multiple mating in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict? Anim. Behav. 38: 749-756.
2. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 261:123-127.
3. Burpee, D.M. & Sakaluk, S.K. 1993. Repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets. Evol. Ecol. 7: 240-250.
4. Chapman, T., Liddle, L.F., Kalb, J.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Partridge, L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241-244.
5. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 41-47.
6. Chippindale, A.K., Gibson, J.R. & Rice, W.R. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1671-1675.
7. Civetta, A. & Clark, A.G. 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13162-13165.
8. Clark, A.G. & Begun, D.J. 1998. Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics 149: 1487-1493.
9. Clark, A.G., Begun, D.J. & Prout, T. 1999. Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283: 217-220.
10. Crudgington, H.S. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407: 855-856.
11. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Dean, J.M. 1981. The relationship between lifespan and reproduction in the grasshopper melanoplus. Oecologia 49: 385-388.
13. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989. A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature 338: 760-761.
14. Gowaty, P.A. 1997. Sexual Dialects, Sexual Selection, and Variation in Reproductive Behavior: Feminism and Evolutionary Biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
15. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5083-5088.
16. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
17. Kasule, F.K. 1986. Repetitive mating and female fitness in Dysdercus cardinalis (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae). Zool. J. Lenn. Soc. 88: 191-199.
18. McKinney, F., Derrckson, S.R. & Mineau, P. 1983. Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behavior 86: 250-294.
19. Moore, A.J., Gowaty, P.A., Wallin, W.G. & Moore, P.J. 2001. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 268: 517-533.
20. Nillsson, T., Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. The effects of male and female genotypes on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 227-233.
21. Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual Selection and Reproduction Competition in Insects. M.S. Blum & N.A. Blum, London.
22. Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. 1990. Nonmating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila-melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 36: 419-425.
23. Partridge, L., Green, A. & Fowler, K. 1987. Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 33: 745-749.
24. Pitnick, S. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. 2002. Harm to females increase with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol 269: 1821-1828.
25. Rice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232-234.
26. Rice, W. & Holland, B. 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific red queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 1-10.
27. Sawby, R. & Huges, K.A. 2001. Male genotype affects female longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55: 834-839.
28. Tachida, H. & Cockerham, C.C. 1988. Variance components of fitness under stabilizing selection. Genet. Res. 51: 47-53.
29. Trivers, R.L. 1972. Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man B. Campbell, Chicago, IL.
30. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2004. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict. Evolution 58: 1028-1037.
31. Wilson, N., Tubman, S.C., Eady, P.E. & Robertson, G.W. 1997. Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1491-1495.