Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 356-368

  Wang, Hansong ^a   Thomas, Duncan C ^a   Pe'er, Itsik ^b   Stram, Daniel O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Multiple comparisons; SNPs; Whole genome association studies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME SIZE; GENOTYPE; MARKER GENE; SAMPLE SIZE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; GENOME; GENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; STATISTICS;

EID: 33646250184     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20150     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altshuler D, Brooks LD, Chakravarti A, Collins FS, Daly MJ, Donnelly P. 2005. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437:1299-1320.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B 57:289-300.
3. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski L. 1995. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. London: Chapman & Hall.
4. Chapman JM, Cooper JD, Todd JA, Clayton DG. 2003. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: a class of tests and the determinants of statistical power. Hum Hered 56:18-32.
5. Collins FS, Guyer MS, Chakravarti A. 1997. Variations on a theme: cataloging human DNA sequence variants. Science 278:1580-1581.
6. Gauderman WJ. 2002. Sample size requirements for association studies of gene-gene interaction. Am J Epidemiol 155:478-484.
7. Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ. 2005. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet 6:95-108.
8. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, Henning AK, SanGiovanni JP, Mane SM, Mayne ST, Bracken MB, Ferris FL, Ott J, Barnstable C, Hoh J. 2005. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 308:385-389.
9. Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. 2001. Variation is the spice of life. Nat Genet 27:234-236.
10. Ohashi J, Clark AG. 2005. Application of the stepwise focusing method to optimize the cost-effectiveness of genome-wide association studies with limited research budgets for genotyping and phenotyping. Ann Hum Genet 69:323-328.
11. Ozaki K, Tanaka T. 2005. Genome-wide association study to identify SNPs conferring risk of myocardial infarction and their functional analyses. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:1804-1813.
12. Risch N, Merikangas K. 1996. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273:1516-1517.
13. Risch NJ. 2000. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405:847-856.
14. Satagopan JM, Elston RC. 2003. Optimal two-stage genotyping in population-based association studies. Genet Epidemiol 25:149-157.
15. Stram DO. 2004. Tag SNP selection for association studies. Genet Epidemiol 27:365-374.
16. The International HapMap Consortium. 2003. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426:789-796.
17. Thomas DC, Haile RW, Duggan D. 2005. Recent developments in genomewide association scans: a workshop summary and review. Am J Hum Genet 77:337-345.
18. Tosteson T, Ware J. 1990. Designing a logistic regression study using surrogatemeasures for exposure and outcome. Biometrika 77:11-21.
19. Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N. 2004. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:434-442.
20. Wang WY, Barratt BJ, Clayton DG, Todd JA. 2005. Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concerns. Nat Rev Genet 6:109-118.