Assessment and innovation: One darn thing leads to another

Assessing Writing

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 80-99

  Rutz, Carol ^a   Lauer Glebov, Jacqulyn ^a  

^a CARLETON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Faculty development; Student learning outcomes; Writing across the curriculum; Writing instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644465356     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2005.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Carleton College Catalog. (2004). Northfield, MN: Carleton College.
2. Condon, W., Kelly-Riley, D., Lauer-Glebov, J., & Rutz, C. (2004, March). Accounting, assessment, and improvement: Getting past good news to benefit from the bad. Panel presentation at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, San Antonio, TX.
3. Condon, W., Lauer-Glebov, J., & Rutz, C. (2003, June). An organic approach to writing assessment. Panel presentation at American Association for Higher Education Conference on Assessment, Seattle, WA.
4. Hardy, C. S. (1996). Report on assessment of student writing at Carleton. Unpublished report. Carleton College, Minnesota.
5. Office of Institutional Research. (2002). Higher Education Research Institute: 2001 Faculty survey results. Unpublished report. Carleton College, Minnesota.
6. C. Rutz C.S. Hardy W. Condon WAC for the long haul: A tale of hope The WAC Journal 13 2002 7-16
7. N. Sommers L. Saltz The novice as expert: Writing the freshman year College Composition and Communication 56 1 2004 124-149
8. L.A. Steen Everything I needed to know about averages I learned in college Peer Review 6 4 2004 4-8
9. Urciouli, B. (2005). The language of higher education assessment: Legislative concerns in a global context. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies.
10. Washington State University (n.d.). Critical thinking rubric. Retrieved December 27, 2004, from http://wsuctproject.ctlt.wsu.edu/ctr.htm.