Diagnostic accuracy of needle-localized open breast biopsy for impalpable breast disease

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 344-347

  Verkooijen, H M ^a   Peeters, P H M ^a   Pijnappel, R M ^a   Koot, V C M ^a   Schipper, M E I ^a   Borel Rinkes, I H M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0034059275     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01380.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 1 Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PMM, Boer R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM et al. Nation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer 1998; 75: 694-8.
2. 2 Burbank F, Parker SH. Methods for evauating the quality of an image-guided breast biopsy program. Seminars in Breast Disease 1998; 1: 71-83.
3. 3 Al-Sobhi SS, Helvie MA, Pass HA, Chang AE. Extent of lumpectomy for breast cancer after diagnosis by stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6: 330-5.
4. 4 Rissanen TJ, Makarainen HP, Mattila SI, Karttunen AI, Kiviniemi HO, Kallioinen MJ et al. Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammography. Clin Radiol 1993; 47: 14-22.
5. 5 Allen MJ, Thompson WD, Stuart RC, Gill PT, Walton EW, Karczenski K et al. Management of non-palpable breast lesions detected mammographically. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 543-5.
6. 6 Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, Aucreman CJ, Cardenosa G, Cink TM et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193: 359-64.
7. 7 Fuhrman GM, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, King TA, Duncan JL, Champaign JL et al. Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 932-9.
8. 8 Seoudi H, Mortier J, Basile R, Curletti E. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: initial experience with a promising technique. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 366-72.
9. 9 Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993; 188: 453-5.
10. 10 Bender JS, Magnuson TH, Smith-Meek MA, Ratner LE, Smith GW. Will Stereotactic breast biopsy achieve results as good as current techniques? Am Surg 1996; 62: 637-40.
11. 11 Alexander HR, Candela FC, Dershaw DD, Kinne DW. Needle-localized mammographic lesions. Results and evolving treatment strategy. Arch Surg 1990; 125: 1441-4.
12. 12 Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997; 204: 677-84.
13. 13 Peeters PHM, Mravunac M, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Holland R, Vooijs GP. Breast cancer risk for women with a false positive screening test. Br J Cancer 1988; 58: 211-12.
14. 14 Hall JA, Murphy DC, Hall BR, Hall KA. Open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities: still an option compared with core needle biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 1245-50.
15. 15 Netherlands Cancer Registry. Incidence of Cancer in the Netherlands 1993. Utrecht: SIG Health Care Information, 1996.
16. 16 Margolin FR. Needle localization guided excisional biopsy for mammographically identified nonpalpable breast lesions. Pathology 1991; 1: 1-10.
17. 17 Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, Georgian-Smith D, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen X-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery 1993; 114: 836-42.