Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions

British Journal of Cancer

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 595-600

  Pijnappel, R M ^a   Van Den Donk, M ^b   Holland, R ^b   Mali, W P Th M ^c   Peterse, J L ^d   Hendriks, J H C L ^b   Peeters, P H M ^c  

^a MARTINI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast biopsy; Core biopsy; FNA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 1542299239     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601559     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Burbank F, Parker SH (1998) Methods for evaluating the quality of an image-guided breast biopsy program. Sem Breast Dis 1: 71-83
2. Cardenosa G (1999) Needle choice for sonographically guided core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173: 845-846
3. Ciatto S, Rosselli DT, Ambrogetti D, Bravetti P, Catarzi S, Morrone D, Cariaggi MP (1997) Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases. Acta Radiol 38: 815-820
4. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FAJ (1997) Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 204: 677-684
5. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni Jr FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210: 799-805
6. Klijanienko J, Cote JF, Thibault F, Zafrani B, Meunier M, Clough K, Asselain B, Vielh P (1998) Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: Institut Curie's experience with 198 histologically correlated cases. Cancer 84: 36-41
7. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP (1995) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164: 1111-1113
8. Lifrange E, Kridelka F, Colin C (1997) Stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions: controversies and future prospects. Eur J Radiol 24: 39-47
9. Masood S (1998) Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: challenges and promises (editorial; comment). Cancer 84: 197-199
10. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H, Chough DM, Sumkin JH (1995) Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge needles. Radiology 197: 739-742
11. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK, Yakes WF, Truell JE, Price JG, Kortz AB, Clark DG (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187: 507-511
12. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, Sneige N, Frable WJ, Gatsonis CA, Evans WP, Tocino I, McNeil BJ (1998) Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer 82: 679-688
13. Rich PM, Michell MJ, Humphreys S, Howes GP, Nunnerley HB (1999) Stereotactic 14G core biopsy of non-palpable breast cancer: what is the relationship between the number of core samples taken and the sensitivity for detection of malignancy? Clin Radiol 54: 384-389
14. Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Levchenko S (1997) Factors associated with clear biopsy margins and clear reexcision margins in breast cancer specimens from candidates for breast conservation. J Am Coll Surg 185: 268-273
15. Tavassoli FA (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ: introduction of the concept of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 11: 140-154
16. Thompson WR, Bowen JR, Dorman BA, Pricolo VE, Shahinian TK, Soderberg CH (1991) Mammographic localization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. A 5-year study. Arch Surg 126: 730-733
17. Verkooijen HM (2002) Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 99: 853-859
18. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, Koot VC, Borel Rinkes I, Mali WP, van Vroonhoven TJ (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 82: 1017-1021