The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 164, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1140-1147

  Elmore, Joann G ^a,b   Carney, Patricia A ^c   Abraham, Linn A ^b   Barlow, William E ^b   Egger, Joseph R ^a   Fosse, Jessica S ^a   Cutter, Gary R ^d   Edward Hendrick, R ^e   D'Orsi, Carl J ^f   Paliwal, Prashni ^g   Taplin, Stephen H ^b,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^h NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNDERWEIGHT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; ODDS RATIO; PROBABILITY; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2442676678     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1140     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:514-527.
2. Reeves MJ, Newcomb PA, Remington PL, Marcus PM, MacKenzie WR. Body mass and breast cancer: relationship between method of detection and stage of disease. Cancer. 1996;77:301-307.
3. Hoe AL, Mullee MA, Royle GT, Guyer PB, Taylor I. Breast size and prognosis in early breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993;75:18-22.
4. Carter AP, Thompson RS, Bourdeau RV, Andenes J, Mustin H, Straley H. A clinically effective breast cancer screening program can be cost-effective, too. Prev Med. 1987;16:19-34.
5. Taplin SH, Mandelson MT, Anderman C, et al. Mammography diffusion and trends in late-stage breast cancer: evaluating outcomes in a population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:625-631.
6. Kopans DB, D'Orsi CJ, Adler DD, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 2nd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 1995.
7. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1546-1554.
8. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults [electronic resource]. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute & North American Association for the Study of Obesity; 2000. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/ob_home.htm. Accessed February 12, 2004.
9. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1999.
10. Tosteson AN, Begg CB. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation. Med Decis Making. 1988;8:204-215.
11. Walsh JM, Dolan NC, Charney P, Gillock MR, Cramer DA, Kefalides PT. Update in women's health. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:808-814.
12. Nelson DE, Bland S, Powell-Griner E, et al. State trends in health risk factors and receipt of clinical preventive services among US adults during the 1990s. JAMA. 2002;287:2659-2667.
13. Walker AR. Breast cancer: can risks really be lessened? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000;9:223-229.
14. Hofer TP, Katz SJ. Healthy behaviors among women in the United States and Ontario: the effect on use of preventive care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1755-1759.
15. Hayward LM, Nixon C, Jasper MP, et al. The process of restructuring and the treatment of obesity in women. Health Care Women Int. 2000;21:615-630.
16. Taplin S, Barlow W, Urban N, et al. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:417-426.
17. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Little LE, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL. The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer. 1998;78:1233-1238.
18. Guest AR, Helvie MA, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM, Bailey JE, Roubidoux MA. Adverse effects of increased body weight on quantitative measures of mammographic image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:805-810.
19. Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR. Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in a clinical setting. Med Phys. 2002;29:830-834.
20. US Quality Determinants of Mammography Guideline Panel. Quality Determinants of Mammography Guideline Panel. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy & Research; 1994.
21. Hunt KA, Sickles EA. Effect of obesity on screening mammography: outcomes analysis of 88,346 consecutive examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1251-1255.
22. Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM, et al. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1373-1380.
23. Fontaine KR, Heo M, Allison DB. Body weight and cancer screening among women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:463-470.
24. Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Screening for cervical and breast cancer: is obesity an unrecognized barrier to preventive care? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:697-704.
25. Carney PA, Harwood BG, Weiss JE, Eliassen MS, Goodrich ME. Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of New Hampshire women. Cancer. 2002;95:219-227.
26. Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1097-1105.
27. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1546-1554.
28. Poplack SP, Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Wells WA, Carney PA. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. Radiology. 2000;217:832-840.
29. Hall IJ, Newman B, Millikan RC, Moorman PG. Body size and breast cancer risk in black women and white women: the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:754-764.
30. Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. 1998;209:511-518.
31. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Finder C, Mandelson MT, Houn F, White E. Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:797-803.