Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 353-376

  Sadler, Troy D ^a   Amirshokoohi, Aidin ^b   Kazempour, Mahsa ^b   Allspaw, Kathleen M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES (SSI);

PERSONNEL; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 33645796852     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20142     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
2. Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: An educational perspective. Science and Education, 8, 1-12.
3. Bell, R.L. & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
4. Bingle, W.H. & Gaskell, P.J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78, 185-201.
5. Bryan, L.A. & Atwater, M.M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge or science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86, 821-839.
6. Bryce, T. & Gray, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 717-733.
7. Bybee, R.W. (1993). Reforming science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: Using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 765-773.
9. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Cross, R.T. & Price, R.F. (1996). Science teachers' social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 319-333.
11. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
12. Eisner, E.W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
13. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
14. Fleming, R. (1986). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues, part I: Social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 677-687.
15. Glenn, A.D. & Gennaro, E.D. (1981). Attitudes of science and social-studies teachers toward interdisciplinary topics and value questions. School Science and Mathematics, 81, 451-458.
16. Haney, J.J., Czerniak, C.M., & Lumpe, A.T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971-993.
17. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645-670.
18. Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 341-368.
19. Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 426-440.
20. King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85, 89-110.
21. Kolstø, S.D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
22. Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
23. Levinson, R. (2004). Teaching bioethics in science: Crossing a bridge too far? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technological Edudation, 4, 353-370.
24. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Loving, C.C. & Foster, A. (2000). The religion-in-the-science- classroom issue: Seeking graduate student conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 445-468.
26. Loving, C.C., Lowy, S.W., & Martin, C. (2003). Recognizing and solving ethical dilemmas in diverse science classrooms. In D.L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education (pp. 183-194). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
27. Lumpe, A.T. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the use of cooperative learning. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 123-135.
28. Lumpe, A.T., Haney, J.J., & Czerniak, C.M. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions to implement science-technology-society (STS) in the classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 1-24.
29. McComas, W.F., Clough, M.P., & Almazroa, H. (2000). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41-52). Netherlands: Kluwer.
30. McGinnis, J.R. & Simmons, P. (1999). Teachers' perspectives of teaching science-technology-society in local cultures: A sociocultural analysis. Science Education, 83, 179-211.
31. Mitchener, C.P. & Anderson, R.D. (1987). Teachers' perspective: Developing and implementing an STS curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 351-369.
32. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 82, 63-70.
33. Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M.M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 411-423.
34. Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 745-754.
35. Pedretti, E. & Hodson, D. (1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 463-485.
36. Peräkylä, A. (2005). Analyzing talk and text. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Sadler, T.D. (2004a). Moral and ethical dimensions of socioscientific decision-making as integral components of scientific literacy. The Science Educator, 13, 39-48.
38. Sadler, T.D. (2004b). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 339-358.
39. Sadler, T.D. (in press). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
40. Sadler, T.D. & Zeidler, D.L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88, 4-27.
41. Sinclair, A.S. & Baldwin, B. (1995). High school biology students' beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Research in the Schools, 2(2), 31-38.
42. Slesnick, I. (2004). Thinking scientifically about controversial issues: Clones, cats, and chemicals. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
43. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Tobin, K. & LaMaster, S.U. (1995). Relationships between metaphors, beliefs, and actions in a context of science curriculum change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 225-242.
45. Trani, R. (2004). I won't teach evolution; it's against my religion. And now for the rest of the story... American Biology Teacher, 66, 419-427.
46. Zeidler, D.L. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education. Netherlands: Kluwer.
47. Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Simmons, M.L., & Howes, E.V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377.
48. Zeidler, D.L., Walker, K.A., Ackett, W.A., & Simmons, M.L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367.
49. Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.