Teaching bioethics in science: Crossing a bridge too far?

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 353-369

  Levinspn, Ralph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011462978     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150409556619     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aikenhead, G. (1986). The content of STS education. STS Research Network Missive, 7(3), 18-23.
2. Beardsley, M. (1975). Thinking straight. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Black, P. (1992). The purposes of science education. In R. Hull (Ed.), ASE science teachers’ handbook (Secondary) (pp. 6-22). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Simon & Schuster.
4. Cerini, B., Murray, I., & Reiss, M (2003). Student review of the science curriculum: Major finding. London: Planet Science.
5. Donnelly, J. (1999). Interpreting differences: The educational aims of teachers of science and history, and their implications. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 17-41.
6. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Edwards, A., & Westgate, D. (1994). Investigating classroom talk. London: The Falmer Press.
8. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Routledge.
9. Irwin, A., Dale, A., & Smith, D. (1996). Science and Hell’s kitchen: The local understanding of hazard issues. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science (pp. 47-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Jenkins, E. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 703-710.
11. Kolstoe, S. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645-664.
12. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Driffield, UK: Studies in Education.
13. Leach, J. (2002). Teachers’ views on the future of the secondary science curriculum. School Science Review, 53(304), 43-50.
14. Lemke, J. (1989). Using language in the classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Levinson, R. (2001). Should controversial issues arising from developments in biomedicine be taught through the humanities rather than science? School Science Review, 52(300), 97-102.
16. Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons. London: Wellcome Trust.
17. Lewis, J., Leach, J., Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). All in the genes? Young people’s understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 74-79.
18. Martins, I., Mortimer, E., Osborne, J., Tsatsarelis, C., & Jimenez Aleixandre, M. (2001). Rhetoric and science education. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graber, M. Komorek, A. Kross et al. (Eds.), Research in science education: Past, present and future (pp. 189-198). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
19. Matthews, M.R. (1994). Science teaching. New York: Routledge.
20. Meek, J. (2000, June 27). US wins the hype war. Guardian, p. 3. Available: http://www.guard-ian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,336888,00.html (accessed May 25, 2004).
21. Meek, J. (2001, May 3). DNA inventor slams plans for database. Guardian. Available: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,482315.00.html. (accessed May 25,2004).
22. Millar, R. (2000). Science for public understanding: Developing a new course for 16-18 year old students. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41(2), 201-214.
23. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.
24. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 126-142). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
25. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
26. Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
27. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (1993). Genetic screening ethical issues. London: Author.
28. Odegaard, M. (2003). Dramatic science: A critical review of science education. Studies in Science Education, 39, 75-101.
29. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents '■ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College.
30. Osbome, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, B. (2002). Breaking the mould? Teaching science for public understanding. London: Nuffield Foundation.
31. Osbome, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review 52(301), 63-70.
32. Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education 19(2), 167-182.
33. Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
34. Reiss, M. (1999). Teaching ethics in science. Studies in Science Education, 37, 115-140.
35. Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45-80.
36. Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role play or debate to promote students’ argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 903-928.
37. Solomon, J. (1992). The classroom discussion of science-based issues presented on television: Knowledge, attitudes, and values. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 431-444.
38. Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology, and society. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
39. Spencer, S., & Klug, F. (1998). Education for citizenship. Multicultural Teaching 16(3), 43-45.
40. Toulmin, S. (1964). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Tytler, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815-832.
42. United Kingdom, Department for Education and Employment. (1999). Science: The national curriculum for England. London: HMSO.
43. United Kingdom, House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2002). Science education from 14 to 19: Third report of session 2001-02 (Vol. 1). London: HMSO.
44. Voloshinov, V.N.’(1976). Freudianism: A Marxist critique. (I.R. Titunik & N.H. Bruss, Eds.; I.R. Titunik, Trans.). New York: Academic Press. (Original work published 1927)
45. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Weiss, R. (1998). Xenotransplantation. British Medical Journal, 317, 931-934.
47. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.