Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues

Journal of Moral Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 339-358

  Sadler, Troy D ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CLONING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; EMPATHY; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; GENE THERAPY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; INTUITION; MORALITY; NATURAL SCIENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SCIENCE; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

BIOLOGY; CLONING, ORGANISM; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION, NONPROFESSIONAL; EMPATHY; GENE THERAPY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; INTUITION; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MORAL DEVELOPMENT; MORALS; NATURE; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENCE; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; WEDGE ARGUMENT;

EID: 4444327757     PISSN: 03057240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305724042000733091     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Bebeau, M. J. & Brabeck, M. M. (1987) Integrating care and justice issues in professional moral education: a gender perspective, Journal of Moral Education, 16(3), 189-203.
2. Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R. & Yamoor, C. M. (1985) Measuring dental students' ethical sensitivity, Journal of Dental Education, 49(4), 225-235.
3. Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R. & Narvaez, D. (1999) Beyond the promise: a perspective on research in moral education, Educational Researcher, 28(4), 18-26.
4. Bersoff, D. M. (1999) Explaining unethical behaviour among people motivated to act prosocially, Journal of Moral Education, 28(4), 413-428.
5. Boss, J. A. (2002) Analyzing moral issues (Boston, MA, McGraw-Hill).
6. Chiappetta, E. L. & Koballa, T. R. (2002) Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Merrill Prentice Hall).
7. Clarkeburn, H. (2002) A test for ethical sensitivity in science, Journal of Moral Education, 31(4), 439-453.
8. Driver, R., Leach, J., Milar, R. & Scot, P. (1996) Young people's images of science (Bristol, PA, Open University Press).
9. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory (Chicago, IL, Aldine).
10. Huffman, M. L. (2000) Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
11. Kirk, J. & Miller, M. (1986) Reliability and validity in qualitative research (Beverly Hills, CA, Sage).
12. Kohlberg, L. (1973) The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment, Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630-646.
13. Kolstø, S. D. (2001) Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues, Science Education, 85(3), 291-310.
14. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S. & Davey, A. (1993) Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education (Driffield, Studies in Education Ltd).
15. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry (Newbury Park, CA, Sage).
16. Luján, J. L. & Todt, O. (2000) Perceptions, attitudes and ethical valuations: the ambivalence of the public image of biotechnology in Spain, Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 383-392.
17. McNeel, S. P. (1994) College teaching and student moral development, in: J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds) Moral development in the professions: psychology and applied ethics (Hilldale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 27-58.
18. Nucci, L. P. (2001) Education in the moral domain (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
19. Pedretti, E. (1999) Decision making and STS education: exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach, School Science and Mathematics, 99(4), 174-181.
20. Rest, J. (1975) Longitudinal study of the Defining Issues Test of moral judgment: a strategy for analyzing moral change, Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 738-748.
21. Rest, J. R. (1986) Moral development: advances in research and theory (New York, NY, Praeger).
22. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J. & Thoma, S. J. (1999) Postconventional moral thinking: a neo-Kohlbergian approach (Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum).
23. Sadler, T. D. (2002) Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: the influence of morality and content knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida.
24. Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D. L. (2004) The morality of socioscientific issues: construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas, Science Education, 88(1), 4-27.
25. Saltzstein, H. D. (1994) The relation between moral judgment and behavior: a social-cognitive and decision-making analysis, Human Development, 37(5), 299-312.
26. Siebert, E. D. & McIntosh, W. J. (Eds) (2001) College pathways to the science education standards (Arlington, VA, NSTA Press).
27. Turiel, E. (1983) The development of social knowledge: morality and convention (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
28. Walker, L. J. (2002) The model and the measure: an appraisal of the Minnesota approach to moral development, Journalt of Moral Education, 31(3), 353-367.
29. Zeidler, D. L. (Ed.) (2003) The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education (Dordrecht, Kluwer).