Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: Implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists

Journal of Career Assessment

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 77-91

  Bieschke, Kathleen J ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcome expectations; Research training; Scientifically minded psychologists; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645764140     PISSN: 10690727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1069072705281366     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. American Psychologist, 58, 377-402.
2. Asay, T. P., Lambert, M. J., Gregersen, A. T., & Goates, M. K. (2002). Using patient-focused research in evaluating treatment outcomes in private practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1213-1225.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bard, C. C., Bieschke, K. J., Herbert, J. T., & Eberz, A. B. (2000). Predicting research interest among rehabilitation counseling students and faculty. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44, 48-55.
6. Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). National conference on scientist-practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71-75.
7. Berg, A. O. (2000). Dimensions of evidence. In J. P. Geyman, R. A. Deyo, & S. D. Ramsey (Eds.), Evidence-based clinical practice: Concepts and approaches (pp. 21-27). Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
8. Beutler, L. E. (2000). David and Goliath: When empirical and clinical standards of practice meet. American Psychologist, 55, 997-1007.
9. Beutler, L. E., Williams, R. E., Wakefield, P. J., & Entwistle, S. R. (1995). Bridging scientist and practitioner perspectives in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 984-994.
10. Bieschke, K. J. (2000). Factor structure of the Research Outcome Expectations Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 8, 303-313.
11. Bieschke, K. J., & Bishop, R. M. (1994). Research Outcome Expectations Questionnaire. Unpublished scale.
12. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. (1996). The utility of the Research Self-EfficacyScale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 59-75.
13. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Herbert, J. T. (1995). Research interest among rehabilitation doctoral students. Rehabilitation Education, 9, 51-66.
14. Bieschke, K. J., Fouad, N. A., Collins, F. L., & Halonen, J. S. (2004). The scientifically-minded psychologist: Science as a core competency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 713-724.
15. Bieschke, K. J., Herbert, J. T., & Bard, C. (1998). Using a social cognitive model to explain research productivity among rehabilitation counselor education faculty. Rehabilitation Education, 12, 1-16.
16. Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1994). Interest in Research Questionnaire. Unpublished scale, Pennsylvania State University.
17. Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 182-188.
18. Brems, C., Johnson, M. E., & Gallucci, P. (1996). Publication productivity of clinical and counseling psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 723-725.
19. Carter, J. A. (2002). Integrating science and practice: Reclaiming the science in practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1285-1290.
20. Forester, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 3-16.
21. Fuertes, J. N., Bartolomeo, M., & Nichols, C. M. (2001). Future research directions in the study of counselor multicultural competency. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 29, 3-12.
22. Gelso, C. J. (1997). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468-476.
23. Gelso, C., & Fretz, B. (2001). Counseling psychology (2nd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
24. Gelso, C. J., & Lent, R. W. (2000). Scientific training and scholarly productivity: The person, the training environment, and their interaction. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed.). pp. 109-139). New York: John Wiley.
25. Gelso, C. J., Mallinckrodt, B., & Judge, A. B. (1996). Research training environment, attitudes toward research, and research self-efficacy: The revised research training environment scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 304-332.
26. Greeley, A. T., Johnson, E., Seem, S., Braver, M., Dias, L., Evans, K., et al. (1989). Research Self-Efficacy Scale. Unpublished scale, Pennsylvania State University.
27. Halonen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, S., & McCarthy, M. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 196-208.
28. Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M., & Wampold, B. E. (1999). Research in counseling (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29. Hollingsworth, M. A., & Fassinger, R. E. (2002). The role of faculty mentors in the research training of counseling psychology doctoral students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 324-330.
30. Hoshmand, L. T., & Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47, 55-66.
31. Kahn, J. H. (2001). Predicting the scholarly activity of counseling psychology students: A refinement and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 1-11.
32. Kahn, J. J., & Scott, N. A. (1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 38-67.
33. Kaslow, N. (2002, November 7-9). Future directions in education and credentialing in professional psychology. Paper presented at the Competencies Conference: Future Directions in Education and Credentialing in Professional Psychology, Scottsdale, AZ.
34. Lampropoulos, G. K., Goldfried, M. R., Castonguay, L. G., Lambert, M. J., Stiles, W. B., & Nestoros, J. N. (2002). What kind of research can we realistically expect from the practitioner? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1241-1264.
35. Lent, R. W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
36. Liu, W. M., Sheu, H., & Williams, K. (2004). Multicultural competency in research: Examining the relationships among multicultural competencies, research training and self-efficacy, and the multicultural environment. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10, 324-339.
37. Lueger, R. J. (2002). Practice-informed research and research-informed psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1265-1276.
38. McGovern, T. V., Furumoto, L., Halpern, D. F., Kimble, G. A. M., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). Liberal education, study in depth, and the arts and sciences major-psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 598-605.
39. O'Brien, K. M., Malone, M. E., Schmidt, C. K., & Lucas, M. S. (1998, August). Research self-efficacy: Improvements in instrumentation. Poster session presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
40. Phillips, J. C., & Russell, R. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 628-641.
41. Phillips, J. C., Szymanski, D. M., Ozegovic, J. J., & Briggs-Phillips, M. (2004). Preliminary examination and measurement of the internship research training environment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 240-248.
42. Quintana, S. M., Troyano, N., & Taylor, G. (2001). Cultural validity and inherent challenges in quantitative methods for multicultural research. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (2nd ed.). pp. 604-630). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Schlosser, L. Z., & Gelso, C. J. (2001). Measuring the working alliance in advisor-advisee relationships in graduate school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 157-167.
44. Stoltenberg, C. D., Pace, T. M., Kashubeck-West, S., Biever, J. L., Patterson, T., & Welch, I. D. (2000). Training models in counseling psychology: Scientist-practitioner versus practitioner-scholar. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 622-640.
45. Stricker, G. (2002). What is a scientist-practitioner anyway? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1277-1283.
46. Stricker, G., & Trierweiler, S. J. (1995). The local clinical scientist. American Psychologist, 50, 995-1002.
47. Sue, S. (1999). Science, ethnicity, and bias: Where have we gone wrong? American Psychologist, 54, 1070-1077.