Predicting research interest among rehabilitation counseling students and faculty

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 48-55

  Bard, Christine C ^a,b   Bieschke, Kathleen J ^a   Herbert, James T ^a   Eberz, Amy B ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Job Path   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034362629     PISSN: 00343552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003435520004400107     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Betz, N. E. (1986). Research training in counseling psychology: Have we addressed the real issues? The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 107-113.
3. Bieschke, K. J., & Bishop, R. M. (1994). Research outcome expectations questionnaire. Unpublished scale, Pennsylvania State University, State College.
4. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. (1996). The utility of the Research Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 59-75.
5. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Herbert, J. T. (1995). Research interest among rehabilitation doctoral students. Rehabilitation Education, 9, 51-66.
6. Bieschke, K. J., Herbert, J. T., & Bard, C. C. (1998). Applying a social cognitive model to explain research productivity among rehabilitation graduate program faculty. Rehabilitation Education, 12, 1-16.
7. Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1994). Interest in research questionnaire. Unpublished scale, Pennsylvania State University, State College.
8. Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 182-187.
9. Gelso, C. J. (1979). Research in counseling: Methodological and professional issues. The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 7-35.
10. Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468-476.
11. Greeley, A. T., Johnson, E., Seem, S., Braver, M., Dias, L., Evans, K., Kincade, E., & Pricken, P. (1989). Research self-efficacy scale. Unpublished scale, Pennsylvania State University, State College.
12. Holland, J. L. (1985). Vocational preference inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13. Holland, J. L. (1986). Student selection, training, and research performance. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 121-126.
14. Kahn, J. H., & Gelso, C. J. (1997). Factor structure of the research training environment scale-Revised: Implications for research training in applied psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 22-37.
15. Kahn, J. H., & Scott, N. A. (1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 38-67.
16. Krebs, P. J., Smither, J. W., & Hurley, R. B. (1991). Relationship of vocational personality and research training environment to the research productivity of counseling psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 362-367.
17. Leahy, M. J., Patterson, J. B., Rubin, S. E., & Walker, M. L. (1994). Controversies in rehabilitation education: Reactions from four educators. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 300-318.
18. Leahy, M. J., Szymanski, E. M., & Linkowski, D. C. (1993). Knowledge importance in rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37, 130-145.
19. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
20. Maki, D. R., & Berven, N. L. (1992). Directory of doctoral study in rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Rehabilitation Counseling Association.
21. Mallinckrodt, B., Gelso, C. J., & Royalty, G. M. (1990). Impact of the research training environment and counseling psychology students' Holland personality type on interest in research. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 26-32.
22. National Council on Rehabilitation Education. (1993-1994). Membership directory. Logan, UT: Author.
23. Phillips, J. C., & Russell, R. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 628-641.
24. Royalty, G. M., Gelso, C. J., Mallinckrodt, B., & Garrett, K. D. (1986). The environment and the student in counseling psychology: Does the research training environment influence graduate students' attitudes toward research? The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 9-30.
25. Schaller, J., & Parker, R. (1997). Effect of graduate research instruction on perceived research anxiety, research utility, and confidence in research skills. Rehabilitation Education, 11, 273-287.
26. Szymanski, E. M., Whitney-Thomas, J., Marshall, L., & Sayger, T. (1994). The effect of graduate instruction in research methodology on research self-efficacy and perceived research utility. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 319-331.
27. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
28. Tarvydas, V. M., & Leahy, M. J. (1993). Licensure in rehabilitation counseling: A critical incident in professionalization. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37, 92-108.
29. Wegener, S. T., Hagglund, K. J., & Elliott, T. R. (1998). On psychological identity and training: Boulder is better for rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 43, 17-29.