Modeling recognition memory using the similarity structure of natural input

Cognitive Science

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 121-145

  Lacroix, Joyca P W ^a   Murre, Jaap M J ^a,b   Postma, Eric O ^a   van den Herik, H Jaap ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Computer simulation; Memory; Perception; Psychology; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645470041     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_48     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Arkadev, A. G., & Braverman, E. M. (1966). Computers and pattern recognition. Washington, DC: Thompson.
2. Barlow, H. B. (1989). Unsupervised learning. Neural Computation, 1, 295-311.
3. Bellman, R. (1961). Adaptive control processes: A guided tour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bishop, C. M. (1995). Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5. Burgess, C., Livesay, K., & Lund, K. (1997) Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes, 25, 211-257.
6. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1-31.
7. Busey, T. A. (1998). Physical and psychological representations of faces: Evidence from morphing. Psychological Science, 9, 476-482.
8. Busey, T. A. (2001). Formal models of familiarity and memorability in face recognition. In M. Wenger & J. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 147-192). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Busey, T. A., & Arici, A. (2005). Dissociations of accuracy and confidence reveal the role of individual items and distinctiveness in recognition memory and metacognition. Manuscript in preparation.
10. Busey, T. A., & Tunnicliff, J. (1999). Accounts of blending, typicality and distinctiveness in face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 1210-1235.
11. Calder, A. J., Burton, A. M., Miller, P., Young, A. W., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Research, 41, 1179-1208.
12. Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-8, 679-698.
13. Caramazza, A., Hersch, H., & Torgerson, W. S. (1976). Subjective structures and operations in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 103-117.
14. Dailey, M. N., Cottrell, G. W., & Busey, T. A. (1999). Facial memory is kernel density estimation (almost). In M. S. Kearns, S. A. Solla, & D. A. Cohn (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 11, pp. 24-30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Dailey, M. N., Cottrell, G. W., Padgett, C., & Adolphs, R. (2002). A neural network that categorizes facial expressions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1158-1173.
16. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478.
17. Derweester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391-407.
18. Edelman, S. (1995). Representation, similarity, and the chorus of prototypes. Minds and Machines, 5, 45-68.
19. Edelman, S. (1998). Representation is representation of similarities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 449-498.
20. Edelman, S., & Intrator, N. (1997). Learning as extraction of low-dimensional representations. In R. Goldstone, D. Medin, & P. Schyns (Eds.), Mechanisms of perceptual learning (Vol. 36, pp. 353-380). San Diego, CA: Academic.
21. Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
22. Eich, J. M. (1985). Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration and charm. Psychological Review, 92, 1-38.
23. Freeman, W. T., & Adelson, E. H. (1991). The design and use of steerable filters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13, 891-906.
24. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
25. Goffaux, V., Hault, B., Michel, C., Vuong, Q. C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Perception, 34, 77-86.
26. Goldstone, R., Steyvers, M., Spencer-Smith, J., & Kersten, A. (2000). Interactions between perceptual and conceptual learning. In E. Diettrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 191-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231-262.
28. Goldstone, R. L., & Steyvers, M. (2001). The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 116-139.
29. Halberstadt, J., Goldstone, R. L., & Levine, G. M. (2003). Featural processing in face preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 270-278.
30. Hancock, P. J. B., Baddeley, R. J., & Smith, L. S. (1992). Principal components of natural images. Network, 3, 61-70.
31. Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (1998). A comparison of two computer-based face identification systems with human perceptions of faces. Vision Research, 38, 2277-2288.
32. Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Bruce, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory and Cognition, 24, 26-40.
33. Hayes, B. K., & Heit, E. (2004). Why learning and development can lead to poorer recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 337-339.
34. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 498-504.
35. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
36. Hubel, D. H. (1988). Eye, brain, and vision. New York: Freeman.
37. Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2002). Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vision Research, 42, 2177-2192.
38. Kalocsai, P., Zhao, W., & Biederman, I. (1998). Face similarity space as perceived by humans and artificial systems. In Proceedings, Third International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (pp. 177-180). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
39. Karn, K. S., & HayHoe, M. M. (2000). Memory representations guide targeting eye movements in a natural task. Visual Cognition, 7, 673-703.
40. Lacroix, J. P. W., Murre, J. M. J., Postma, E. O., & Van den Herik, H. J. (2004). The natural input memory model. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2004) (pp. 773-778). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
42. Lee, T. S. (1998). Image representation using 2d Gabor wavelets. IEEE Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18, 959-971.
43. Lyons, M., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Coding facial expressions with Gabor wavelets. In Proceedings, Third International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (pp. 200-205). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
44. Lyons, M. J. (2000). A linked aggregate code for processing faces. Pragmatics and Cognition, 8, 63-81.
45. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760.
46. McSorley, E., & Findlay, J. M. (2003). Saccade target selection in visual search: Accuracy improves when more distractors are present. Journal of Vision, 3, 877-892.
47. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
48. Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411-422). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Norman, J. F., Phillips, F., & Ross, H. E. (2001). Information concentration along the boundary contours of naturally shaped solid objects. Perception, 30, 1285-1294.
50. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986), Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
51. Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87-108.
52. Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2003). A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1194-1209.
53. Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2003). Top-down control of visual attention in object detection. In IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 253-256). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
54. O'Toole, A., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Valentin, D. (1993). Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space. Journal of the Optical Society of America, Series A, 10, 405-411.
55. O'Toole, A. J., Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Quantitative models of perceiving and remembering faces: Precedents and possibilities. In M. Wenger & J. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 1-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
56. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 291-303.
58. Petrov, Y., & Zhaoping, L. (2003). Local correlations, information redundancy, and sufficient pixel depth in natural images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 20, 56-66.
59. Pike, R. (1984). Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition. Psychological Review, 91, 281-293.
60. Postma, E. O., Van den Herik, H. J., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1997). SCAN: A scalable neural model of covert attention. Neural Networks, 10, 993-1015.
61. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
62. Rajashekar, U., Cormack, L. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2002). Visual search: Structure from noise. In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium (pp. 119-123). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
63. Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1995). An active vision architecture based on iconic representations. Artificial Intelligence, 78, 461-505.
64. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: Rem: Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 145-166.
65. Steyvers, M. (2000). Modeling semantic and orthographic similarity effects on memory for individual words. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
66. Steyvers, M., & Busey, T. (2000). Predicting similarity ratings to faces using physical descriptions. In M. Wenger & J. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 115-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
67. Steyvers, M., Shiffrin, R. M., & Nelson, D. L. (2004). Word association spaces for predicting semantic similarity effects in episodic memory. In A. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festschrift in honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
68. Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. de, & Langford, J. C. (2000, December 22). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290, 2319-2323.
69. Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71-86.
70. Valentine, T. (1991). Representation and process in face recognition. In R. Watt (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction, Vol. 14: Pattern recognition by man and machine. London, England: Macmillan.
71. Viken, R. J., Treat, T. A., Nosofsky, R. M., McFall, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Modeling individual differences in perceptual and attentional processes related to bulimic symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 598-609.
72. Wainwright, M. (1999). Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Research, 39, 3960-3974.
73. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.
74. Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1022-1041.