Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 26-40

  Hancock, Peter J B ^a   Burton, A Mike ^b   Bruce, Vicki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERFORMANCE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0029680961     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03197270     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ABDI, H., VALENTIN, D., EDELMAN, B., & O'TOOLE, A. J. (1995). More about the difference between men and women: Evidence from linear neural network and principal component approach Perception, 24, 539-562.
2. BARTLETT, J. C., & SEARCY, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
3. BENSON, P. J., & PERRET, D. I. (1991). Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 105-135.
4. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition by components. A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147
5. BRUCE, V., BURTON, A. M., & DENCH, N. (1994). What's distinctive about a distinctive face? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 119-141
6. BRUCE, V., BURTON, A. M., DENCH, N., HANNA, E., HEALEY, P., MASON, O., COOMBES, A., FRIGHT, R., & LINNEY, A. (1993). Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception, 22, 131-152.
7. BRUCE, V., COOMBES, A., & RICHARDS, R. (1993) Describing the shapes effaces using surface primitives. Image & Vision Computing, 11, 353-363.
8. BRUCE, V., HANNA, E., DENCH, N., HEALY, P., & BURTON, A. M. (1992). The importance of "mass" in line drawings of faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 619-628.
9. BRUCE, V., HEALY, P., BURTON, M., DOYLE, T., COOMBES, A., & LINNEY, A. (1991). Recognising facial surfaces. Perception, 20, 755-769.
10. BRUCE, V., & YOUNG, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
11. BRUNELLI, R., & POGGIO, T. (1993) Face recognition - Features versus templates, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 15, 1042-1052.
12. BURTON, A. M. (1994). Learning new faces in an interactive activation and competition model. Visual Cognition, 1, 313-348.
13. BURTON, A. M., BRUCE, V., & DENCH, N. (1993) What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement. Perception, 22, 153-176.
14. BURTON, A. M., BRUCE, V., & JOHNSTON, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 361-380.
15. CRAW, I., & CAMERON, P. (1991). Parameterising images for recognition and reconstruction. In P. Mowforth (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
16. DAVIES, G. M., ELLIS, H. D., & SHEPHERD, J. W. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180-187.
17. ELLIS, H. D. (1986). Processes underlying face recognition. In R. Bruyer (Ed.), The neuropsychology of face perception and facial expression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. FARAH, M. J., O'REILLY, R. C., & VECERA, S. P. (1993). Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of a lesioned neural network. Psychological Review, 100, 571-588.
19. HANCOCK, P. J. B., BURTON, A. M., & BRUCE, V. (1995). Preprocessing images of faces. Correlations with human perceptions of distinctiveness and familiarity. In Proceedings of the IEE Fifth Internationa! Conference on Image Processing and Its Application. London: IEE.
20. HAY, D. C , & YOUNG, A. W. (1982). The human face. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 173-202). London: Academic Press.
21. HAYHS, T., MORRONE, M. C., & BURR, D. C. (1986). Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images. Perception, 15, 595-602.
22. KIRBY, M., & SIROVICH, L. (1990) Applications of the Karhunen-Loeve procedure for the characterisation of human faces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 12, 103-108.
23. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986) Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 115, 139-157.
24. O'TOOLE, A. J., ABDI, H., DEFFENBACHER, K. A., & BARTLETT, J. C. (1991). Simulating the "other-race effect" as a problem in perceptual learning. Connection Science. Journal of Neural Computing, Artificial Intelligence & Cognitive Research, 3, 163-178.
25. O'TOOLE, A. J., DEFFENBACHER, K. A., VALENTIN, D., & ABDI, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other race effect Memory & Cognition, 22, 208-224.
26. RHODES, G. (1988). Looking at faces. First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17, 43-63.
27. RHODES, G , BRAKE, S., & ATKINSON, A. P. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
28. RHODES, G., BRENNEN, S., & CAREY, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
29. SHEPHERD, J. (1986). An interactive computer system for retrieving faces In H. Ellis, M. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 398-409). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
30. TANAKA, J. W., & FARAH, M. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
31. TURK, M., & PENTLAND, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71-86.
32. VALENTINE, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
33. VALENTINE, T., & BRUCE, V. (1986a) The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525-536.
34. VALENTINE, T., & BRUCE, V. (1986b) Recognising familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 300-305.
35. VALENTINE, T., & ENDO, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.
36. VOKEY, J. R., & READ, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory & Cognition, 20, 291-302.
37. WURTZ, R. P., VORBRUGGEN, J. C., & VON DER MALSBURG, C. (1990). A transputer system for the recognition of human faces by labeled graph matching. In R. Eckmiller, G. Hartmann, & G. Hauske (Eds.), Parallel processing in neural systems and computers (pp. 37-41). Amsterdam. Elsevier
38. YOUNG, A. W., & BRUCE, V. (1991). Perceptual categories and the computation of grandmother European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 5-49.
39. YOUNG, A. W., HELLAWELL, D , & HAY, D. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.