Manual control of the visual stimulus reduces the flash-lag effect

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 2192-2203

  Ichikawa, Makoto ^a   Masakura, Yuko ^a  

^a YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computer mouse; Flash lag effect; Observers' control; Reaction time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIGHT; LUMINANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; HAND; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645021201     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.021     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. T. Bachmann, I. Luiga, E. Poder, and K. Kalev Perceptual acceleration of objects in stream: Evidence from flash-lag displays Consciousness and Cognition 12 2003 279 297
2. M.V.C. Baldo, A.H. Kihara, J. Namba, and S.A. Klein Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli Perception 31 2002 17 30
3. S. Clark, F. Tremblay, and D. Ste-Marie Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions Neuropsychologia 42 2003 105 112
4. D.M. Eagleman, and T.J. Sejnowski Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness Science 287 2000 2036 2038
5. D.M. Eagleman, and T.J. Sejnowski Reply to Patel et al Science 290 2000 1051
6. D.J. Finney Probit Analysis 1971 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
7. K.L. Harman, G.H. Humphrey, and M.A. Goodale Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition Current Biology 9 1999 1315 1318
8. R. Held Plasticity in sensory-motor systems Scientific American 213 1965 84 94
9. O. Hikosaka, S. Miyauchi, and S. Shimojo Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation Vision Research 33 1993 1219 1240
10. M. Ichikawa, and H. Egusa How is depth perception affected by long-term wearing of left-right reversing spectacles? Perception 22 1993 971 984
11. M. Ichikawa, T. Kimura, H. Egusa, M. Nakatsuka, J. Amano, T. Ueda, and T. Tashiro Modification of depth and distance perception caused by long-term wearing of left-right reversing spectacles Perception 32 2003 131 153
12. K.H. James, G.K. Humphrey, and M.A. Goodale Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: Where the action is Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 2001 111 120
13. R. Jones, and D. Lee Why two eyes are better than one: The two views of binocular vision Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 1981 30 40
14. B. Khurana, K. Watanabe, and R. Nijhawan The role of attention in motion extrapolation: Are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed? Perception 29 2000 675 692
15. B. Krekelberg, and M. Lappe Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects Trends in Neurosciences 24 2001 335 339
16. A. Maravita, K. Clarke, M. Husain, and J. Driver Active tool use with the contralesional hand can reduce cross-modal extinction of touch on that hand Neurocase 8 2002 411 416
17. A. Maravita, M. Husain, K. Clarke, and J. Driver Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction Neuropsychologia 39 2001 580 585
18. A. Maravita, C. Spence, S. Kennett, and J. Driver Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans Cognition 83 2002 B25 B34
19. S. Miyauchi, H. Egusa, M. Amagase, K. Sekiyama, T. Imaruoka, and T. Tashiro Adaptation to left-right reversed vision rapidly activates ipsilateral visual cortex in humans Journal of Physiology-Paris 98 2004 207 219
20. I. Murakami The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure Journal of Vision 1 2001 126 136
21. R. Nijhawan Motion extrapolation in catching Nature 370 1994 256 257
22. R. Nijhawan Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 2002 387 393
23. R. Nijhawan, and K. Kirschfeld Analogous mechanisms compensate for neural delays in the sensory and the motor pathways: Evidence from motor flash-lag Current Biology 13 2003 749 753
24. S.S. Patel, H. Ogmen, H.E. Bedell, and V. Sampath Flash-lag effect: Differential latency, not post diction Science 290 2000 1051
25. F. Pavani, C. Spence, and J. Driver Visual capture of touch: Out-of-body experiences with rubber gloves Psychological Science 11 2000 353 359
26. M.I. Posner Orienting of attention Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 1980 3 25
27. G. Purushothaman, S.S. Patel, H.E. Badell, and H. Ogmen Moving ahead through differential visual latency Nature 396 1998 424
28. B.J. Rogers, and M.E. Graham Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception Perception 8 1979 125 134
29. K. Sekiyama, S. Miyauchi, T. Imaruoka, H. Egusa, and T. Tashiro Body image as a visuomotor transformation device revealed in adaptation to reversed vision Nature 407 2000 374 377
30. B.R. Sheth, R. Nijhawan, and S. Shimojo Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones Nature Neuroscience 3 2000 489 495
31. S. Shimojo, and Y. Nakajima Adaptation to the reversal of binocular depth cues: Effects of wearing left-right reversing spectacles on stereoscopic depth perception Perception 10 1981 391 402
32. S. Shioiri, K. Yamamoto, and H. Yaguchi Effect of attention on flash lagging Journal of Vision 2 2002 27a
33. J.J. Uhlarik Role of cognitive factors on adaptation to prismatic displacement Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 1973 223 232
34. H. Ujike, and H. Ono Depth thresholds of motion parallax as a function of head movement velocity Vision Research 41 2001 2835 2843
35. R.B. Welch Perceptual Modification 1978 Academic Press New York
36. R.B. Welch, M.H. Widawski, J. Harrington, and D.H. Warren An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation Perception & Psychophysics 25 1979 126 132
37. M. Wexler, F. Panerai, I. Lamouret, and J. Droulez Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects Nature 409 2001 85 88
38. D. Whitney, and I. Murakami Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation Nature Neuroscience 1 1998 656 657
39. D. Whitney, I. Murakami, and P. Cavanagh Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli Vision Research 40 2000 137 149
40. S. Yamamoto, and S. Kitazawa Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing Nature Neuroscience 4 2001 759 765
41. S. Yamamoto, and S. Kitazawa Sensation at the tips of invisible tools Nature Neuroscience 4 2001 979 980