The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure

Journal of Vision

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 126-136

  Murakami, Ikuya ^a  

^a NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bias; Flash lag effect; Psychometric function; Relative position; Spatiotemporal kernel; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITION EFFECT; PREDICTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ILLUSION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035789987     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/1.2.6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allik, J., & Kreegipuu, K. (1998). Multiple visual latency. Psychological Science, 9, 135-138.
2. Baldo, M. V. C., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature, 378, 565-566.
3. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2000). Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research, 40, 1645-1648.
4. Cai, R. H., Pouget, A., Schlag-Rey, M., & Schlag, J. (1997). Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals. Nature, 386, 601-604.
5. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000a). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287, 2036-2038.
6. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000b). The position of moving objects. Response. Science, 289, 1107a.
7. Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? Reply. Nature, 378, 555-556.
8. Khurana, B., Watanabe, K., & Nijhawan, R. (2000). The role of attention in motion extrapolation: Are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed? Perception, 29, 675-692.
9. Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: A consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research, 39, 3702-3709.
10. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (1999). Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Research, 39, 2669-2679.
11. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2000). A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research, 40, 201-215.
12. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 335-339.
13. Lappe, M., & Krekelberg, B. (1998). The position of moving objects. Perception, 27, 1437-1449.
14. Mateeff, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (1988). Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away. Vision Research, 28, 711-719.
15. Matin, L., & Pearce, D. G. (1965). Visual perception of direction for stimuli flashed during voluntary saccadic eye movements. Science, 148, 1485-1487.
16. Murakami, I. (2001). A flash-lag effect in random motion. Vision Research, 41, 3101-3119.
17. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature, 370, 256-257.
18. Nijhawan, R. (1997). Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation. Nature, 386, 66-69.
19. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature, 396, 424.
20. Shapiro, K. L., Arnell, K. M., & Raymond, J. E. (1997). The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291-296.
21. Shimojo, S., Miyauchi, S., & Hikosaka, O. (1997). Visual motion sensation yielded by non-visually driven attention. Vision Research, 37, 1575-1580.
22. Sutter, E. E. (2001). Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Research, 41, 1241-1255.
23. Whitney, D., Cavanagh, P., & Murakami, I. (2000a). Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction. Vision Research, 40, 3829-3839.
24. Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 656-657.
25. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000b). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research, 40, 137-149.