A transactional perspective on reading difficulties and Response to Intervention

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 117-128

  Mceneaney, John E ^a,b   Lose, Mary K ^a,c   Schwartz, Robert M ^a  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Education ^*  (United States)

^c Reading and Language Arts Department   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31944432819     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.41.1.7     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. ANDERSON, J.R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.
2. ANDERSON, M.L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial intelligence, 149, 91-130.
3. ARNETT, J.L. (1977). Early visual information processing as a function of age and reading ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
4. ASKEW, B.J., KAYE, E., FRASIER, D.F., MOBASHER, M., ANDERSON, N., & RODRIGUEZ, Y. (2002). Making a case for prevention in education. Literacy, Teaching, and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 6(2), 43-73.
5. BEAUVOIS, M.F., & DEROUESNÉ, J. (1979). Phonological alexia: Three dissociations. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 42, 1115-1124.
6. BODER, E. (1970). Developmental dyslexia: A new diagnostic approach based on the identification of three subtypes. Journal of School Health, 40, 289-290.
7. BRANSFORD, J.D., BROWN, A.L., & COCKING, R.R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. BRIGGS, C., & YOUNG, B. (2003). Does Reading Recovery work in Kansas? A retrospective longitudinal study of sustained effects. The Journal of Reading Recovery, 3(1), 59-64.
9. BROWN, J.S., COLLINS, A., & DUGUID, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
10. BROWN, W., DENTON, E., KELLY, P., & NEAL, J. (1999). Reading Recovery effectiveness: A five-year success story in San Luis Coastal Unified School District. ERS Spectrum: Journal of School Research and Information, 17(1), 3-12.
11. CASTLES, A., & COLTHEART, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47(1), 149-180.
12. CENTER, Y., WHELDALL, L., FREEMAN, L, OUTHRED, L., & MCNAUGHT, M. (1995). An experimental evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
13. CHAPMAN, J.C. (1923). The unreliability of the difference between intelligence and educational ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14, 103-108.
14. CLANCEY, W. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. CLAY, M.M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155-173.
16. CLAY, M.M. (1998). By different paths to common outcomes. York, ME: Stenhouse.
17. CLAY M.M. (2001). Change over time in children 's literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. CLAY, M.M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. CLAY, M.M., & CAZDEN, C.B. (1990). A Vygotskian interpretation of Reading Recovery. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 206-222). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. COLES, G. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at learning disabilities. New York: Pantheon.
21. COLTHEART, M., MASTERSON, J., BYNG, S., PRIOR, M., & RIDDOCH, J. (1983). Surface dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 469-595.
22. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE K., PERRY C., LANGDON R., & ZIEGLER J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
23. CRANE, A.R. (1959). An historical critical account of the accomplishment quotient idea. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 252-259.
24. CURETON, E.E. (1937). The accomplishment quotient technique. Journal of Experimental Education, 5, 315-326.
25. DEWEY, J., & BENTLEY, A.F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
26. DUFFY, G.G., ROEHLER, L.R., & PUTNAM, J. (1987). Putting the teacher in control: Basal reading textbooks and instructional decision making. Elementary School Journal, 87, 357-366.
27. EDUCATION OF ALL HANDICAPPED CHILDREN ACT OF 1975, Pub. L. 94-142.
28. EISNER, E.W. (1992). Are all causal claims positivistic? A reply to Francis Schrag. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 8-9.
29. ELBAUM, B., VAUGHN, S., HUGHES, M.T., & MOODY, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure?: A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605-619.
30. ERICKSON, F. (1992). Why the clinical trial doesn't work as a metaphor for educational research: A response to Schrag. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 9-11.
31. FISHER, J.H. (1905). A case of congenital word blindness. Review, 19, 315-318.
32. FLETCHER, J.M., & DENTON, C. (2003, December). Validity of alternative approaches to the identification of LD: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
33. FLETCHER, J.M., LYON, G.R., BARNES, M., STUEBING, K.K., FRANCIS, D.J., OLSON, R.K., & SHAYWITZ, S.E. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D.P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. FLETCHER, J.M., SHAYWITZ, S.E., SHANKWEILER, D.P., KATZ, L., LIBERMAN, I.Y., STEUBING, K.K., FRANCIS, D.J., ET AL. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
35. FRANKENBERGER, W., & FRONZAGLIO, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495-500.
36. FRANZEN, R. (1920). The accomplishment quotient: A school mark in terms of individual capacity. Teachers College Record, 21, 432-440.
37. FUCHS, D., FUCHS, L.S., MATHES, P.G., & LIPSEY, M.E. (2000). Reading differences between low achieving students with and without learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E.P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn, Contemporary special education research (pp. 105-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. GAFFNEY, J.S., & ANDERSON, R.C. (1991). Two-tiered scaffolding: Congruent processes of teaching and learning. In E.H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society. New York: Teachers College Press.
39. GEE, J.P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 714-725.
40. GERBER, M.M. (2003, December). Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies far identifying children with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
41. GOMEZ-BELLENGE, F.X., RODGERS, E.M., & SCHULTZ, M. (2005). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura national report 2003-2004. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
42. GRESHAM, F.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467-519). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. GRESHAM, F.M., VANDERHEYDEN, A., & WITT, J.C. (2005). Response to intervention in the identification of learning disabilities: Empirical support and future challenges. Unpublished manuscript. Available online at http://www.joewitt.org/Downloads/ Response_to_Intervention_MS_Gresham_Vanderheyden_Witt.pdf
44. HAMMILL, D., & LARSEN, S. (1974). The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training. Exceptional Children, 41, 5-14.
45. HAMMILL, D., & LARSEN, S. (1978). The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training: A reaffirmation of position. Exceptional Children, 44, 402-414.
46. HARRIS, A.J. & SIPAY, E.R. (1985). How to increase reading ability. New York: Longman.
47. HAUGELAND, J. (1981). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. In John Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design (pp. 220-242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. HIEBERT, E.H., COLT, J.M., CATTO, S.L., & GURY, E.C. (1992). Reading and writing of first-grade students in a restructured Chapter 1 program. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 545-572.
49. HINSHELWOOD, J. (1900). Congenital word blindness. Lancet, 1, 1506-1508.
50. HINSHELWOOD, J. (1917). Congenital word blindness. London:
51. H.K. Lewis. HOSKYN, M., & SWANSON, H.L (2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. The School Psychology Review, 29, 102-119.
52. HUMMEL-ROSSI, B., & ASHDOWN, J. (2002). The state of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses in education. Review of Educational Research, 72, 1-30.
53. HURRY, J., & SYLVA, K. (1998). The long-term effects of two interventions for children with learning disabilities. London Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, QCA/98/165.
54. IVERSEN, S.J., & TUNMER, W.E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program, Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112-126.
55. JIMENEZ, R.T. (2000). Literacy and identity development of Latina/o students. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 971-1000.
56. JOHNSON, D.J., & MYKLEBUST, H.R. (1967). Learning disabilities: Educational principles and practices. New York: Grune & Stratton.
57. JUEL, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268-289.
58. JUST, M.A., & CARPENTER, P.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
59. KAVALE, K.A. (2002, August). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Learning Disabilities Summit: Building a Foundation for the Future, Washington, D.C. Available online at http://www.nrcld.org/html/information/articles/ldsummit
60. KROESBERGEN, E.H., VAN LUIT, J.E.H., & NAGLIERI, J.A. (2003). Mathematical learning difficulties and PASS cognitive processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 574-582.
61. KUSSMAUL, A. (1877). Word deafness and word blindness. In H. vonZiemssen (Ed.), Clycopedia of the practice of medicine, 14 (pp. 770-778). New York: William Wood.
62. LAVE, J., & WENGER, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. LOVELL, K., GRAY, E.A., & OLIVER, D.E. (1964). A further study of some cognitive and other disabilities in backward readers of average non-verbal reasoning scores. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 275-279.
64. LYONS, C.A., & BEAVER, J. (1995). Reducing retention and learning disability placement through Reading Recovery: An educationally sound cost-effective choice. In R. Allington & S. Walmsley (Eds.) No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp.116-136). New York: Teachers College Press and Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
65. LYONS, C.A., PINNELL, G.S., & DEFORD, D.D. (1993). Partners in learning: Teachers and children in Reading Recovery. New York: Teachers College Press.
66. MANN, L. (1979). On the trail of process. New York: Grune & Stratton.
67. MATHES, P.G., DENTON, C.A., FLETCHER, J.M., ANTHONY, J.L., FRANCIS, D.J., & SCHATSCHNEIDER, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148-182.
68. MATTHEWS, M.W., & KESNER, J. (2003). Children learning with peers: The confluence of peer status and literacy competence within small-group literacy events. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 208-234.
69. MERCER, C.D., JORDAN, L., ALLSOPP, D.H., & MERCER, A.R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217-232.
70. MOATS, L.C. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
71. MORGAN, W.P. (1896). A case of congenital word blindness. British Medical Journal, 11, 378.
72. MYKLEBUST, H.R., & JOHNSON, D.J. (1962). Dyslexia in children. Exceptional Children, 29, 14-25.
73. NAGLIERI, J.A., & JOHNSON, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591-597.
74. O'CONNER, E.A., & SIMIC, O. (2002). The effect of Reading Recovery on special education referrals and placements. Psychology in the Schools, 39 (6), 635-646.
75. ORTON, S.T. (1925). "Word blindness" in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581-615.
76. PALINCSAR, A.S., MAGNUSSON, S.J., MARANO, N.L., FORD, D., & BROWN, N. (1997). Design principles informing and emerging from a community of practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
77. PEARSON, P.D. (1999). A historically based review of Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 231-246.
78. PINNELL, G.S. (1989). Reading Recovery: Helping at-risk children learn to read. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 161-183.
79. PINNELL, G.S. (1994). An inquiry based model for educating teachers of literacy. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 1, 29-42.
80. PINNELL, G.S., LYONS, C.A., DEFORD, D.E., BRYK, A.S., & SELTZER, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8-39.
81. POPENOE, H. (1927). A report of certain significant deficiencies of the accomplishment quotient. Journal of Educational Research, 16, 40-47.
82. PRESSLEY, M., WHARTON-MCDONALD, R., ALLINGTON, R., MORROW, L., TRACEY, D., ET AL. (2001). A study of effective grade-1 literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 35-58.
83. QUAY, L.C., STEELE, D.C., JOHNSON, C.I., & HORTMAN, W. (2001). Children's achievement and personal and social development in a first-year reading recovery program with teachers in-training. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 5, 7-25.
84. RESCHLY, D.J., & YSSELDYKE, J. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-IV (pp. 3-20). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
85. RODGERS, E.M. (2000). When is a scaffold a scaffold? In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 49th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 78-90). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
86. RODGERS, E.M. (2005). Interactions that scaffold reading performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 501-532.
87. ROEHRIG, A.D., PRESSLEY, M., & SLOUP, M. (2001). Reading strategy instruction in regular primary-level classrooms by teachers trained in Reading Recovery. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 17, 323-348.
88. ROGOFF, B., MATUSOV, E., & WHITE, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D.R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 388-414). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
89. ROSENBLATT, L.M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
90. ROWE, K.J. (1995). Factors affecting students' progress in reading: Key findings from a longitudinal study. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 1(2), 57-110.
91. RUTTER, M., & YULE, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181-197.
92. SALOMON, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research, Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10-18.
93. SCHMITT, M.C., ASKEW, B.J., FOUNTAS, I.C., LYONS, C.A., & PINNELL, G.S. (2005). Changing futures: The influence of Reading Recovery in the United States. Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.
94. SCHWARTZ, R.M. (1997). Self-monitoring in beginning reading. The Reading Teacher, 51, 40-48.
95. SCHWARTZ, R.M. (1998, Fall). Supporting teacher learning: Reading Recovery as a community of practice. Network News, pp. 1-5.
96. SCHWARTZ, R.M. (2005a). Decisions, decisions: Responding to primary students during guided reading. The Reading Teacher, 58, 436-443.
97. SCHWARTZ, R.M. (2005b). Literacy learning of at-risk first graders in the Reading Recovery early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 257-267.
98. SCRUGGS, T.E., & MASTROPIERI, M.A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
99. SHAYWITZ, S.E., ESCOBAR, M.D., SHAYWITZ, B.A., FLETCHER, J.M., & MAKUCH, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(3), 145-150.
100. SNOW, C.E., BURNS, M.S., & GRIFFIN, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
101. SPIRO, R.J., FELTOVICH, M.J., & COULSON, R.L. (1991, May). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext. Educational Technology, pp. 24-33.
102. STANOVICH, K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 1-29.
103. STANOVICH, K.E. (1993). The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. In G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J.F. Kavanagh, & N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities (pp. 273-308). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
104. STANOVICH, K.E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
105. STANOVICH, K., & SIEGEL, L. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core-variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
106. STUBBING, K.K., FLETCHER, J.M., LEDOUX, J.M., LYON, G.R., SHAYWTTZ, S.E., & SHAYWITZ, B.A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469-518.
107. TOOPS, H.A., & SYMONDS, P.M. (1922). What shall be expected of the AQ? Journal of Educational Psychology, 13, 513-528.
108. TORGESEN, J. (2002). Empirical and theoretical support for direct diagnosis of learning disabilities by assessment of intrinsic processing weaknesses. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 565-613). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
109. VAN DER WISSEL, A., & ZEGERS, F.E. (1985). Reading retardation revisited. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 3-9.
110. VAUGHN, S., & FUCHS, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
111. VAUGHN, S., & LINAN-THOMPSON, S. (2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? Journal of Special Education, 37, 140-147.
112. VELLUTINO, F.R., SCANLON, D., & LYON, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against IQ-achievement discrepancy of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
113. WASIK, B.A., & SLAVIN, R.E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 178-200.
114. WILLSON, V.L. (1987). Statistical and psychometric issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3(1), 24-28.
115. WOLF, M. & BOWERS, P. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
116. WOOD, D. (2003). The why? What? When? and How? of tutoring: The development of helping and tutoring skills in children. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 7(1, 2), 1-30.
117. WOOD, D., & WOOD, H. (1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 33, 153-169.
118. YSSELDYKE, J.E. (1973). Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching: The search for aptitude-treatment interactions. In L. Mann & D. Sabatino (Eds.), The first review of special education (pp. 5-32). New York: Grune & Stratton.
119. YULE, W., RUTTER, M., BERGER, M., & THOMPSON, J. (1974). Over- and under-achievement in reading: Distribution in the general population. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 1-12.