Literacy learning of at-risk first-grade students in the Reading Recovery early intervention

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 257-267

  Schwartz, Robert M ^a  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement gap; At risk readers; Clinical trials; Early intervention; Literacy research

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444465778     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.257     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Askew, B. J., Fountas, I. C., Lyons, C. A., Pinnell, G. S., & Schmitt, M. C. (1998). Reading Recovery review: Understanding outcomes & implications. Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.
3. Blachman, B. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483-502). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1985). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities (Tech. Rep. No. 360). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
5. Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York: Guilford Press.
6. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
8. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2001). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological-processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141-176.
9. Clay, M. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
10. Clay, M. M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155-173.
11. Clay, M. M. (1993a). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Clay, M. M. (1993b). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13. Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children's literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Clay, M. M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Clay, M. M., & Cazden, C. B. (1990). A Vygotskian interpretation of Reading Recovery. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 206-222). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
18. Gómez-Bellengé, F. X. (2001). Reading Recovery and Decubriendo la Lectura National Report 1999-2000. Columbus: The Ohio State University, National Data Evaluation Center.
19. Gómez-Bellengé, F. X. (2002). Reading Recovery and Decubriendo la Lectura National Report 2000-2001. Columbus: The Ohio State University, National Data Evaluation Center.
20. Gómez-Bellengé, F. X., & Thompson, J. (2000). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo La Lectura National Report 1998-1999. Columbus: The Ohio State University, National Data Evaluation Center.
21. Gómez-Bellengé, F. X., & Thompson, J. (2004). Summary statistics for an observation survey of early literacy achievement tasks in U.S. schools (Tech. Rep. No. 04). Columbus: The Ohio State University, National Data Evaluation Center.
22. Hiebert, E. H. (1994). Reading Recovery in the United States: What difference does it make to an age cohort? Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15-25.
23. Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112-126.
24. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
25. Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Nicholson, C. L. (1990). Slosson Oral Reading Test: Revised manual. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications.
27. Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 36-76.
28. Peterson, B. (1991). Selecting books for beginning readers. In D. E. DeFord, C. A. Lyons, & G. S. Pinnell (Eds.), Bridges to literacy: Learning from Reading Recovery (pp. 119-147). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
29. Pinnell, G. S. (2000). Reading Recovery: An analysis of a research-based reading intervention. Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.
30. Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (1999). Matching books to readers: Using leveled books in guided reading, K-3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
31. Schwartz, R. M. (1997). Self-monitoring in beginning reading. The Reading Teacher, 51, 40-48.
32. Schwartz, R. M. (2005). Decisions, decisions: Responding to primary students during guided reading. The Reading Teacher, 58, 436-443.
33. Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
34. Stahl, K. A. D., Stahl, S. A., & McKenna, M. C. (1999). The development of phonological awareness and orthographic processing in Reading Recovery. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 4, 27-40.
35. Stallman, A. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1990). Formal measures of early literacy. In L. Morrow & J. Smith (Eds.), Assessment for instruction in early literacy (pp. 7-44). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604.
37. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
38. Touchstone Applied Science Associates. (2000). DRP handbook: J & K test forms. Brewster, NY: Author.
39. Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2002). The interactive strategies approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 573-635.
40. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
41. What evidence says about Reading Recovery. (2002). Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.
42. Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-177.