Mathematical Learning Difficulties and PASS Cognitive Processes

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 574-582

  Kroesbergen, Evelyn H ^a   Van Luit, Johannes E H ^a   Naglieri, Jack A ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242542396     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194030360060801     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Davis, J. T., Parr, G., & Lan, W. (1997). Differences between learning disability subtypes classified using the revised Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 346-352.
3. Geary, D. C., Hanson, C. O., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236-263.
4. Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 20-33.
5. Jordan, N., & Hanich, L. B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 567-578.
6. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Interpretive manual for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2001). Assessment of specific learning disabilities in the new millennium: Issues, conflicts, and controversies. In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 433-461). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disabilities say and don't say. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239-257.
9. Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2002a). Towards a Dutch version of the Cognitive Assessment System (internal report). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University, ISED
10. Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2002b). Teaching multiplication to low math performers: Guided versus structured instruction. Instructional Science, 30, 361-378.
11. Kroesbergen, E. H., Van Luit, J. E. H., Van der Ben, E., Leuven, N., & Vermeer, A. (2000). Meten van intelligence bij kinderen met ADHD [Measuring intelligence in children with ADHD]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, Kinderpsychiatrie en Klinische Kinderpsychologie, 25, 168-179.
12. Mercer, C. D. (1997). Students with learning disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
13. Naglieri, J. A. (1999). Essentials of CAS assessment. New York: Wiley.
14. Naglieri, J. A. (2000). Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 419-433.
15. Naglieri, J. A. (2001). Using the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) with learning disabled children. In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 141-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997a). Cognitive assessment system. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
17. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997b). Cognitive Assessment System interpretive handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
18. Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1995). A cognitive education approach to math instruction for the learning disabled: An individual study. Psychological Reports, 76, 1343-1354.
19. Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1997). Mathematics instruction and PASS cognitive processes: An intervention study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 513-520.
20. Naglieri, J. A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591-597.
21. Siegel, L. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304-319.
22. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350-361.
23. Van Luit, J. E. H., Kaskens, J., & Van der Krol, R. (1993). Speciaal rekenhulpprogramma vermenigvuldigen en verdelen [Special remediating program multiplication and division]. Doetinchem, the Netherlands: Graviant.
24. Van Luit, J. E. H., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (1999). Leren vermenigvuldigen: Eigen inbreng of directe instructie? [Multiplication learning: Own contributions or direct instruction?]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
25. Van Luit, J. E. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (1999). Effectiveness of the MASTER strategy training program for teaching special children multiplication and division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 98-107.
26. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
27. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Revised Tests of Achievement: Standard and supplemental batteries. Itasca, IL: Riverside.