Reading strategy instruction in regular primary-level classrooms by teachers trained in reading recovery

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 323-348

  Roehrig, Alysia D ^a   Pressley, Michael ^a   Sloup, Marlys ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b Madison Metropolitan School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008834238     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/105735601317095061     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner con trol. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Cunningham, P. M. (1995). Phonics they use: Words for reading and uniting. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
4. Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., Vavrus, L. G., Wes- selman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
5. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teach ing for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Lyons, C. A., Pinnell, G. S., & DeFord, D. E. (1993). Partners in learning: Teachers and children in reading recovery New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
8. Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Con- temporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-344.
9. Pinnell, G. S. (1989). Reading recovery: Helping at risk children learn to read. Elementary School Journal, 90 (2), 161-182.
10. Pinnell, G. S. (1997). Reading Recovery: A summary of research, hi J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 638-654). New York: MacMillan.
11. Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (1998). Word matters: Teaching phonics and spelling in the reading/writing classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., DeFord, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8-39.
13. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Sc-huder, T., Bergman, J., Almasi, L., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511-554.
14. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Trac-ey, D., Baker, K., Brooks, G., Cronin, J., Nelson, E., & Woo, D. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (1), 35-58.
15. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teadier characteristics and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 99, 101-128.
17. Wolcott, II. F. (1988). Ethnographic research in education. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 187-249). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.