DPANN: Improved sequence to structure alignments following fold recognition

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 528-538

  Reinhardt, Astrid ^a   Eisenberg, David ^b  

^a Faint Signals Pattern Recognition   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Distant homology modeling; Substitution matrix

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 3142771861     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20144     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Quackenbush J, Cho J, Lee D, Liang F, Holt I, Karamycheva S, Parvizi B, Pertea G, Sultana R, White J. The TIGR gene indices: analysis of gene transcript sequences in highly sampled eukaryotic species. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:159-164.
2. Peterson JD, Umayam LA, Dickinson T, Hickey EK, White O. The comprehensive microbial resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:123-125.
3. Baxter SM, Fetrow JS. Sequence- and structure-based protein function prediction from genomic information. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2001;4:291-295.
4. Casari G, Sander C, Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nature Struct Biol 1995;2:171-178.
5. Reese MG, Hartzell G, Harris NL, Ohler U, Abril JF, Lewis SE. Genome annotation assessment in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res 2000;10:483-501.
6. Pawlowski K, Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. Sensitive sequence comparison as protein function predictor. Pac Symp Biocomput 2000:42-53.
7. Rost B. Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J Mol Biol 2002;318:595-608.
8. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996;257:342-358.
9. Fetrow JS, Skolnick J. Method for prediction of protein function from sequence using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm with application to glutaredoxins/thioredoxins and T1 ribonucleases. J Mol Biol 1998;281:949-968.
10. Zhang B, Rychlewski L, Pawlowski K, Fetrow JS, Skolnick J, Godzik A. From fold predictions to function predictions: automation of functional site conservation analysis for functional genome predictions. Protein Sci 1999;8:1104-1115.
11. Fetrow JS, Siew N, Di Gennaro JA, Martinez-Yamout M, Dyson HJ, Skolnick J. Genomic-scale comparison of sequence- and structure-based methods of function prediction: does structure provide additional insight? Protein Sci 2001;10:1005-1014.
12. Di Gennaro JA, Siew N, Hoffman BT, Zhang L, Skolnick J, Neilson LI, Fetrow JS. Enhanced functional annotation of protein sequences via the use of structural descriptors. J Struct Biol 2001;134:232-245.
13. Landgraf R, Xenarios I, Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J Mol Biol 2001;307:1487-1502.
14. Armon A, Graur D, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J Mol Biol 2001;307:447-463.
15. Pupko T, Bell RE, Mayrose I, Glaser F, Ben-Tal N. Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues. Bioinformatics 2002;18(Suppl 1):S71-7.
16. Yao H, Kristensen DM, Mihalek I, Sowa ME, Shaw C, Kimmel M, Kavraki L, Lichtarge O. An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. J Mol Biol 2003;326:255-261.
17. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:291-325.
18. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96.
19. Buchan DW, Shepherd AJ, Lee D, Pearl FM, Rison SC, Thornton JM, Orengo CA. Gene3D: structural assignment for whole genes and genomes using the CATH domain structure database. Genome Res 2002;12:503-514.
20. Siew N, Fischer D. Twenty thousand ORFan microbial protein families for the biologist? Structure (Camb) 2003;11:7-9.
21. Jones DT. Protein structure prediction in the postgenomic era. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:371-379.
22. Skolnick J, Fetrow JS, Kolinski A. Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:283-287.
23. Moult J. Predicting protein three-dimensional structure. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1999;10:583-588.
24. Levitt M. Competitive assessment of protein fold recognition and alignment accuracy. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:92-104.
25. Marchler-Bauer A, Levitt M, Bryant SH. A retrospective analysis of CASP2 threading predictions. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:83-91.
26. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Domingues FS, Koppensteiner WA. An attempt to analyse progress in fold recognition from CASP1 to CASP3. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:226-230.
27. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Domingues FS, Prlic A, Malik R, Andreeva A, Wiederstein M. Assessment of the CASP4 fold recognition category. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:55-67.
28. Lesk AM. Molecular evolution. Introduction to protein architecture. First ed., Vol 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p 176-186.
29. Waterman MS, Vingron M. Sequence comparison significance and poisson approximation. Statistical Science 1994;9:367-381.
30. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
31. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
32. Elofsson A. A study on protein sequence alignment quality. Proteins 2002;46:330-339.
33. Blake JD, Cohen FE. Pairwise sequence alignment below the twilight zone. J Mol Biol 2001;307:721-735.
34. Panchenko AR, Bryant SH. A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments. Protein Sci 2002;11:361-370.
35. Marchler-Bauer A, Panchenko AR, Ariel N, Bryant SH. Comparison of sequence and structure alignments for protein domains. Proteins 2002;15:439-446.
36. Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. In search for more accurate alignments in the twilight zone. Protein Sci 2002;11:1702-1713.
37. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Kihara D, Betancourt M, Rotkiewicz P, Boniecki M. Ab initio protein structure prediction via a combination of threading, lattice folding, clustering, and structure refinement. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:149-156.
38. Kolinski A, Betancourt MR, Kihara D, Rotkiewicz P, Skolnick J. Generalized comparative modeling (GENECOMP): a combination of sequence comparison, threading, and lattice modeling for protein structure prediction and refinement. Proteins 2001;44:133-149.
39. Lassmann T, Sonnhammer EL. Quality assessment of multiple alignment programs. FEBS Lett 2002;529:126-130.
40. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignments. Protein Sci 2000;9:1487-1496.
41. Mallick P, Weiss R, Eisenberg D. The directional atomic solvation energy: an atom-based potential for the assignment of protein sequences to known folds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:16041-16046.
42. Orengo CA, Pearl FM, Bray JE, Todd AE, Martin AC, Lo Conte L, Thornton JM. The CATH database provides insights into protein structure/function relationships. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:275-279.
43. Rost B. Phd - predicting one-dimensional protein-structure by profile-based neural networks. Methods Enzymol 1996;266:525-539.
44. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
45. Baldi P, Brunak S. Learning algorithms: miscellaneous aspects:. In: Thomas Dietterich, editor. Bioinformatics: the machine learning approach, adaptive computation and machine learning. London: The MIT Press; 1998. p 88.
46. Martin ACR. http://www.bioinf.org.uk/software/profit/.
47. McLachlan AD. Rapid comparison of protein structures. Acta Crystallogr A 1982;38:871-873.
48. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Some measures of comparative performance in the three CASPs. Proteins 1999; Suppl 3:231-237.
49. Fischer D, Elofsson A, Rice D, Eisenberg D. Assessing the performance of fold recognition methods by means of a comprehensive benchmark. Pac Symp Biocomput 1996:300-318.
50. John B, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3982-3992.