Genome annotation assessment in Drosophila melanogaster

Genome Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 483-501

  Reese, Martin G ^a   Hartzell, George ^a   Harris, Nomi L ^a   Ohler, Uwe ^a,b   Abril, Josep F ^c   Lewis, Suzanna E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; CONTIG; NUCLEOTIDE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVALUATION; EXON; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC CODE; GENOME; INTRON; LETTER; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENES, INSECT; GENOME; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

ARACHNIDA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HEXAPODA; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0034098729     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.10.4.483     Document Type: Letter

References (60)

1. Agarwal, P. and D.J. States. 1998. Comparative accuracy of methods for protein sequence similarity search. Bioinformatics 14: 40-47.
2. Altschul, S.F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers and D.J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
3. Arkhipova, I. R. 1995. Promoter elements in Drosophila melanogaster revealed by sequence analysis. Genetics 139: 1359-1369.
4. Ashburner, M. 2000. A biologist's view of the Drosophila genome annotation assessment. Genome Res. (this issue).
5. Ashburner, M., P. Bork, R. Durbin, R. Guigó, and T.J. Hubbard. 1999a. GASP1 assessment meeting, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany.
6. Ashburner, M., S. Misra, J. Roote, S.E. Lewis, R. Blazej, T. Davis, C. Doyle, R. Galle, R. George, N. Harris et al. 1999b. An exploration of the sequence of a 2.9-Mb region of the genome of drosophila melanogaster. The adh region. Genetics 153: 179-219.
7. Ashburner, M. et al. 1999c. European Drosophila Genome Project (EDGP). http://edgp.ebi.ac.uk/.
8. Bateman, A., E. Birney, R. Durbin, S.R. Eddy, K.E. Howe, and E.L. Sonnhammer. 2000. The Pfam Protein Families Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 263-266.
9. Benson, G. 1999. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 573-580.
10. Besemer, J. and M. Borodovsky. 1999. Heuristic approach to deriving models for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 3911-3920.
11. Birney, E. 1999. Wise2. http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Wise2/.
12. Birney, E. and R. Durbin. 1997. Dynamite: A flexible code generating language for dynamic programming methods used in sequence comparison. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 5: 56-64.
13. _. 2000. Using GeneWise in the Drosophila annotation experiment. Genome Res. (this issue).
14. Burge, C. and S. Karlin. 1997. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 78-94.
15. _. 1998. Einding the genes in genomic DNA. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8: 346-354.
16. Burset, M. and R. Guigó. 1996. Evaluation of gene structure prediction programs. Genomics 34: 353-367.
17. Cavin Périer, R., T. Junier, C. Bonnard, and P. Bucher. 1999. The Eukaryotic Promoter Database (EPD): Recent developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 307-309.
18. Cavin Périer, R., V. Praz, T. Junier, C. Bonnard, and P. Bucher. 2000. The Eukaryotic Promoter Database (EPD). Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 302-303.
19. Dunbrack, R.E., Jr., D.E. Gerloff, M. Bower, X. Chen, O. Lichtarge, and F.E. Cohen. 1997. Meeting review: The Second meeting on the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996. Folding Design 2: R27-R42.
20. Eeckman, F.H. and R. Durbin. 1995. ACeDB and macace. Methods Cell Biol. 48: 583-605.
21. Fickett, J.W. and C.S. Tung. 1992. Assessment of protein coding measures. Nucleic Acids Res. 20: 6441-6450.
22. Fickett, J.W. and A.G. Hatzigeorgiou. 1997. Eukaryotic promoter recognition. Genome Res. 7: 861-878.
23. Florea, E., G. Hartzell, Z. Zhang, G.M. Rubin, and W. Miller. 1998. A computer program for aligning a cDNA sequence with a genomic DNA sequence. Genome Res. 8: 967-974.
24. Gaasterland, T. and C.W. Sensen. 1996. MAGPIE: Automated genome interpretation. Trends Genet. 12: 76-78.
25. Guigó, R., S. Knudsen, N. Drake, and T. Smith. 1992. Prediction of gene structure. J. Mol. Biol. 226: 141-157.
26. Harris, N.L., G. Helt, S. Misra, and S.E. Lewis. 1999. CloneCurator. http://www.fruitfly.org/displays/CloneCurator.html.
27. Helt, G., E. Blossom, J. Morris, D. Fineman, S. Cherritz, S. Shaw, and C.L. Harmon. 1999. Neomorphic Genome Software Development Toolkit (NGSDK). Neomorphic, Inc., Berkeley, CA. http://www.neomorphic.com.
28. Henikoff, S. and J.G. Henikoff. 1994. Protein family classification based on searching a database of blocks. Genomics 19: 97-107.
29. _. 2000. Genomic sequence annotation based on translated searching of the Blocks+ Database. Genome Res. (this issue).
30. Henikoff, J.G., S. Henikoff, and S. Pietrokovski. 1999a. New features of the Blocks Database servers. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 226-228.
31. _. 1999b. Blocks+: A non-redundant database of protein alignment blocks derived from multiple compilations. Bioinformatics 15: 471-479.
32. Jurka, J. 1998. Repeats in genomic DNA: Mining and meaning. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8: 333-337.
33. Krogh, A. 1997. Two methods for improving performance of an HMM and their application for gene finding. Ismb 5: 179-186.
34. Kulp, D., D. Haussler, M.G. Reese, and F.H. Eeckman. 1997. Integrating database homology in a probabilistic gene structure model. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2: 232-244.
35. Kurtz, S. and C. Schleiermacher. 1999. REPuter: Fast computation of maximal repeats in complete genomes. Bioinformatics 15: 426-427.
36. Levitt, M. 1997. Competitive assessment of protein fold recognition and alignment accuracy. Proteins (Suppl.) 1: 92-104.
37. Marcotte, E.M., M. Pellegrini, M.J. Thompson, T.O. Yeates, and D. Eisenberg. 1999. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402: 83-86.
38. Mott, R. 1997. EST_GENOME: A program to align spliced DNA sequences to unspliced genomic DNA. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 13: 477-478.
39. Moult, J., T. Hubbard, S.H. Bryant, K. Fidelis, and J.T. Pedersen. 1997. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round II. Proteins (Suppl.) 1: 2-6.
40. Moult, J., T. Hubbard, K. Fidelis, and J.T. Pedersen. 1999. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round III. Proteins (Suppl.) 3: 2-6.
41. Ohler, U., S. Harbeck, H. Niemann, E. Noth, and M.G. Reese. 1999. Interpolated markov chains for eukaryotic promoter recognition. Bioinformatics 15: 362-369.
42. Ohler, U., G. Stommer, and S. Harbeck. 2000. Stochastic segment models of eukaroyotic promoter regions. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 5: 377-388.
43. Parra, G., E. Blanco, and R. Guigó. 2000. GeneI7D in Drosophila. Genome Res. (this issue).
44. Pearson, W.R. 1995. Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases. Protein Sci. 4: 1145-1160.
45. Pearson, W.R. and D.J. Lipman. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 2444-2448.
46. Reese, M.G. 2000. "Genome annotation in Drosophila melanogaster." Ph.D. thesis, University of Hohenheim, Germany.
47. Reese, M.G., F.H. Eeckman, D. Kulp, and D. Haussler. 1997. Improved splice site detection in Genie. J. Comput. Biol. 4: 311-323.
48. Reese, M.G., N.L. Harris, G. Hartzell, and S.E. Eewis. 1999. The 7th conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology (ISMB '99), Heidelberg, Germany, http://www.fruitfly.org/GASP.
49. Reese, M.G., D. Kulp, H. Tammana, and D. Haussler. 2000. Genie-Gene finding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. (this issue).
50. Rubin, G.M. 2000. Full-length cDNA project. http://www.fruitfly.org/EST
51. Rubin, G.M. et al. 1999. Berkeley Drosophia Genome Project (BDGP). http://www.fruitfly.org.
52. Salamov, A.A. and V.V. Solovyev. 2000. Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. (this issue).
53. Sippl, M.J., P. Lackner, F.S. Domingues, and W.A. Koppensteiner. 1999. An attempt to analyse progress in fold recognition from CASP1 to CASP3. Proteins (Suppl.) 3: 226-230.
54. Solovyev, V.V., A.A. Salamov, and C.B. Lawrence. 1995. Identification of human gene structure using linear discriminant functions and dynamic programming. Ismb 3: 367-375.
55. Sonnhammer, E.L., S.R. Eddy, and R. Durbin. 1997. Pfam: A comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins 28: 405-420.
56. Sonnhammer, E.L., S.R. Eddy, E. Birney, A. Bateman, and R. Durbin. 1998. Pfam: Multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 320-322.
57. Stein, L.D. and J. Thierry-Mieg. 1998. Scriptable access to the Caenorhabditis elegans genome sequence and other ACEDB databases. Genome Res. 8: 1308-1315.
58. Stormo, G.D. 2000. Gene-finding approaches for eukaryotes. Genome Res. (this issue).
59. Uberbacher, E.G. and R.J. Mural. 1991. Locating protein-coding regions in human DNA sequences by a multiple sensor-neural network approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 11261-11265.
60. Zemla, A., C. Venclovas, J. Moult, and K. Fidelis. 1999. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins (Suppl.) 3: 22-29.