An online support system to scaffold real-world problem solving

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 139-157

  Ge, Xun ^a   Er, Nelson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31344438113     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820500382893     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ADL. (2005) Advanced distribution learning network. Retrieved June 23, 2005 from http://www.adlnet.org/.
2. Azevedo, R. and Cromley, J. and Seibert, D. (2004) Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, pp. 344-370.
3. Barab, S. and Duffy, T. (2000) From practice fields to communities of practice. In Theoretical foundations of learning environments. (pp. 25-55). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. (2000) How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
5. Brown, A. and Palincsar, A. (1989) Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Chi, M. and Bassok, M. and Lewis, M. and Reimann, P. and Glaser, R. (1989) Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems Cognitive Science, 13, pp. 145-182.
7. Chi, M. and Glaser, R. (1985) Problem solving ability. In Human abilities: An information processing approach. (pp. 227-250). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
8. Coleman, E. (1998) Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3 & 4), pp. 387-427.
9. Davis, E. and Linn, M. (2000) Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), pp. 819-837.
10. Derry, S. and Lajoie, S. (1993) A middle camp for (un)intelligent instructional computing: An introduction. In Computers as cognitive tools. (pp. 1-11). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Duffy, T. and Cunningham, D. (1996) Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Handbook for educational communications and technology. (pp. 170-198). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.
12. Ferguson, W. and Bareiss, R. and Birnbaum, L. and Osgood, R. (1992) ASK Systems: An approach to the realization of story-based teachers The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), pp. 95-134.
13. Ge, X. and Chen, C. and Davis, K. Scaffolding novice instructional designers' problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment Journal of Educational Computing Research.
14. Ge, X. and Du, J. and Chen, C. and Huang, K. (2005) The effects of question prompts in facilitating ill-structured problem solving in a web-based learning environment. In Presentation at the annual convention of Association for Educational Communications and Technology.. Orlando FL
15. Ge, X. and Land, S. (2003) Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), pp. 21-38.
16. Ge, X. and Land, S. (2004) A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), pp. 5-22.
17. Hannafin, M. and Land, S. and Oliver, K. (1999) Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In Instructional design theories and models, Vol. 2: A new paradigm of instructional technology. (pp. 115-140). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Harper, B. and Hedberg, J. and Corderoy, B. and Wright, R. (2000) Employing cognitive tools within interactive multimedia applications. In Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls. (pp. 227-245). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Jonassen, D. (1999) Designing constructivist learning environments. In Instructional design theories and models, Vol. 2: A new paradigm of instructional technology. (pp. 215-239). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. King, A. (1991) Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), pp. 307-317.
21. King, A. (1992) Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning Educational Psychologist, 27(1), pp. 111-126.
22. King, A. and Rosenshine, B. (1993) Effect of guided cooperative questioning on children's knowledge construction Journal of Experimental Education, 61(2), pp. 127-148.
23. Kitchner, K. (1983) Cognition, metacognition, and epistemistic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing Human Development, 26, pp. 222-232.
24. Kolodner, J. (1993) Case-based reasoning. San Mateo CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
25. Kolodner, J. and Guzdial, M. (2000) Theory and practice of case-based learning aids. In Theoretical foundations of learning environments. (pp. 1-23). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Lajoie, S. and Azevedo, R. (2000) Cognitive tools for medical informatics. In Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls. (pp. 247-273). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Land, S. and Hannafin, M. (2000) Student-centered learning environments. In Theoretical foundations of learning environments. (pp. 1-23). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Lin, X. (2001) Designing metacognitive activities Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), pp. 23-40.
29. Lin, X. and Lehman, J. (1999) Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of promoting college students to reflect on their own thinking Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), pp. 837-858.
30. Linn, M. and Bell, P. and Hsi, S. (1998) Using the Internet to enhance student understanding of science: The Knowledge Integration Environment Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1/2), pp. 4-38.
31. Merrill, M. (1999) Instructional Transaction Theory (ITT): Instructional design based on knowledge objects. In Instructional design theories and models, Vol. 2: A new paradigm of instructional technology. (pp. 397-424). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Merrill, M. (2002) Knowledge objects and mental-models. In The instructional use of learning objects. (pp. 261-280). Bloomington IN: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communication & Technology.
33. Orrill, C. (2002) Learning objects to support inquiry-based, online learning. In The instructional use of learning objects. (pp. 131-148). Bloomington IN: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communication & Technology.
34. Palincsar, A. and Brown, A. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities Cognition and Instruction, 2, pp. 117-175.
35. Planas, L. and Er, N. and Ge, X. (2005) A web-based cognitive modeling system to scaffold pharmacy students' problem-solving skills. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.. Cincinnati OH
36. Reigeluth, C. (1999) The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In Instructional design theories and models, Vol. 2: A new paradigm of instructional technology. (pp. 425-453). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Rosenshine, B. and Meister, C. and Chapman, S. (1996) Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies Review of Educational Research, 66(2), pp. 181-221.
38. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. (1989) Computer-supported intentional learning environments Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), pp. 51-68.
39. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. and Steinbach, R. (1984) Teachability of reflective processes in written composition Cognitive Science, 8(2), pp. 173-190.
40. Schunk, D. (1987) Peer models and children's behavioral change Review of Educational Research, 57, pp. 149-174.
41. Shaffer, D. (2001) Design, collaboration, and computation: The design studio as a model for computer-supported collaboration in mathematics. In CSCL: Carrying forward the conversation. (pp. 197-222). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Shute, V. and Psotka, J. (1996) Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present, and future. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. (pp. 570-600). New York: Scholastic Press in Collaboration with the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
43. van den Boom, G. and Paas, F. and van Merriënboer, J. and van Gog, T. (2004) Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students' self-regulated learning competence Computers in Human Behavior, 20, pp. 551-567.
44. van Merriënboer, J. and Kirschner, P. and Kester, L. (2003) Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning Educational Psychologist, 38(1), pp. 5-13.
45. Voss, J. and Post, T. (1988) On the solving of ill-structured problems. In The nature of expertise. (pp. 261-286). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Voss, J. and Post, T. (1998).
47. Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE). (2005) Retrieved June 23, 2005 from http://wise.berkeley.edu/
48. Webb, N. and Palincsar, A. (1996) Group processes in the classroom. In Handbook of educational psychology. (pp. 841-873). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
49. Wiley, D. (2002) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In The instructional use of learning objects. (pp. 1-23). Bloomington IN: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communication & Technology.
50. Zellermayer, M. and Salomon, G. and Globerson, T. and Givon, H. (1991) Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), pp. 373-391.