The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman's principles: An experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 874-884

  Jones, Adam G ^a   Rosenqvist, Gunilla ^b   Berglund, Anders ^c   Avise, John C ^d  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; SALAMANDRIDAE; SYNGNATHUS TYPHLE; TARICHA GRANULOSA;

EID: 30744474683     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.5.874     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Ahnesjö, I. 1995. Temperature affects male and female potential reproductive rates differently in the sex-role reversed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle. Behav. Ecol. 6:229-233.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Andersson, M. and Y. Iwasa. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:53-58.
4. Arnold, S. J. 1994. Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144:S126-S149.
5. Arnold, S. J. and M. J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
6. Arnold, S. J. and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143:317-348.
7. Avise, J. C., A. G. Jones, D. Walker, J. A. DeWoody et al. 2002. Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: Lessons for ecology and evolution. Ann. Rev. Genet. 36:19-45.
8. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
9. Berglund, A. and G. Rosenqvist. 1990. Male limitation of female reproductive success in a pipefish: Effects of body-size differences. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27:129-133.
10. Berglund, A., G. Rosenqvist, and I. Svensson. 1986. Mate choice, fecundity and sexual dimorphism in two pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19:301-307.
11. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1983. Selection in relation to sex. In D. S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from molecules to men, pp. 457-481. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Crow, J. F. 1958. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum. Biol. 30:1-15.
13. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
14. Emlen, S. T. and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223.
15. Fairbairn, D. J. and A. E. Wilby. 2001. Inequality of opportunity: Measuring the potential for sexual selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:667-686.
16. Gloor, G. and W. Engels. 1992. Single-fly DNA preps for PCR. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 71:148-149.
17. Grafen, A. 1987. Measuring sexual selection: why bother? In J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson (eds.), Sexual selection: Testing the alternatives, pp. 221-233. Wiley, Chichester.
18. Grafen, A. 1988. On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. In T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Reproductive success, pp. 454-471. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
19. Griffith, S. C., I. P. F. Owens, and K. A. Thuman. 2002. Extra-pair paternity in birds: A review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol. Ecol. 11:2195-2212.
20. Hubbell, S. P. and L. K. Johnson. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130:91-112.
21. Jones, A. G. and W. R. Ardren. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 12:2511-2523.
22. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2002. Validation of Bateman's principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc. R. Soc. London B 269:2533-2539.
23. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2004. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: The response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio. Am. Nat. 164:444-456.
24. Jones, A. G. and J. C. Avise. 1997a. Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal. Mol. Ecol. 6:203-213.
25. Jones, A. G. and J. C. Avise. 1997b. Polygynandry in the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae revealed by microsatellite markers. Evolution 51:1611-1622.
26. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, S. J. Arnold, and J. C. Avise. 2000a. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. London B 267:677-680.
27. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise. 1999a. The genetic mating system of a sex-role-reversed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle): A molecular inquiry. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46:357-365.
28. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise. 1999b. Clustered microsatellite mutations in the pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Genetics 152:1057-1063.
29. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise. 2000b. Mate quality influences multiple maternity in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Oikos 90:321-326.
30. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
31. Koenig, W. D. and S. S. Albano. 1986. On the measurement of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 72:358-382.
32. Kokko, H., A. Mackenzie, J. D. Reynolds, J. Lindstrom, and W. J. Sutherland. 1999. Measures of inequality are not equal. Am. Nat. 72:358-382.
33. Lande, R. and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
34. Shuster, S. M. and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and alternative mating strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
35. Sutherland, W. J. 1985a. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33:1349-1352.
36. Sutherland, W. J. 1985b. Measures of sexual selection. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 1:90-101.
37. Sutherland, W. J. 1987. Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. In J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson (eds.), Sexual selection: Testing the alternatives, pp. 209-219. Wiley, Chichester.
38. Vincent, A., I. Ahnesjö, and A. Berglund. 1994. Operational sex ratios and behavioural sex differences in a pipefish population. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34:435-442.
39. Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114:742-747.
40. Wade, M. J. and S. J. Arnold. 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28:446-461.