A reference model for designing effective reputation information systems

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 365-380

  Rein, Gail L ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Determinants of reputation; Meta specification; Organizational reputation; Personal reputation; Reference model; Reputation information systems; Reputation systems

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL RATING; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

DETERMINANTS OF REPUTATION; META-SPECIFICATION; ORGANIZATIONAL REPUTATION; PERSONAL REPUTATION; REFERENCE MODEL; REPUTATION INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REPUTATION SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 30544431890     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551505055401     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. R. Alsop, Consumers in U.S., weary of scandals, just want the truth, The Wall Street Journal Europe (12 February 2003) A6.
2. G.A. Fine, Difficult Reputations: Collective Memories of the Evil, Inept, and Controversial (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2001).
3. J.M. Whitmeyer, Effects of positive reputation systems, Social Science Research 29(2) (2000) 188-207.
4. D.M. Kreps, Game Theory and Economic Modelling (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990).
5. P. Resnick, R. Zeckhauser, E. Friedman and K. Kuwabara, Reputation systems, Communications of the ACM 43(12) (2000) 45-8.
6. Webster's Deluxe Unabridged Dictionary (Simon & Schuster, New York, 1979).
7. S. Albert and D. Whetten, Organizational identity. In: L.L. Cummings and B.M. Shaw (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1985) 263-95.
8. T.H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998).
9. J.E. Dutton and J.M. Dukerick, Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation, Academy of Management Journal 34(3) (1991) 517-54.
10. C.J. Fombrun, Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1996).
11. M. Schultz, J. Mouritsen and G. Gabrielsen, Sticky reputation: analyzing a ranking system, Corporate Reputation Review 4(1) (2001) 24-41.
12. L.R. Smeltzer, The meaning and origin of trust in buyersupplier relationships, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 33(1) (1997) 40-48.
13. S. Ba and P.A. Pavlou, Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: premiums and buyer behavior, MIS Quarterly 26(3) (2002) 243-68.
14. K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, Toward a community-oriented design of internet platforms, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(3) (2002) 71-95.
15. P. Herbig and J. Milewicz, The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success, Journal of Consumer Marketing 12(4) (1995) 5-10.
16. R. Bayan, Words that Sell (Contemporary Books, Lincolnwood, Chicago, 1984).
17. J. Carter, E. Bitting and A.A. Ghorbani, Reputation formalization for an information-sharing multi-agent system, Computational Intelligence 18(4) (2002) 515-34.
18. C. Dellarocas, The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms, Management Science 49(10) (2003) 1407-24.
19. H. Kautz, B. Selman and M. Shah, The hidden web, AI Magazine 18(2) (1997) 27-36.
20. L. Mui, A. Halberstadt, and M. Mohtashemi, Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems: a review. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Bologna (ACM Press, 2002) 280-87.
21. S. Tadelis, The market for reputations as an incentive mechanism, Journal of Political Economy 110(4) (2002) 854-82.
22. O.E. Williamson, Calculativeness, trust and economic organization, Journal of Law and Economics 36(1) (1993) 453-86.
23. E.C.M. Noyons, Joining bibliometric forces. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Colima, Mexico, 1999 (Universidad de Colima, Colima, 1999) 386-94.
24. P. Pichappan and R. Ponnudurai, Skewness in citation peak, In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Colima, Mexico, 1999 (Universidad de Colima, Colima, 1999) 395-407.
25. S.K. Sen, Citation theories: different aspects of the game, In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics Informetrics, Colima, Mexico, 1999 (Universidad de Colima, Colima, 1999) 441-9.
26. W.S. Tiew and B.K. Sen, Acknowledgement patterns in research articles: a bibliometric study based on Journal of Natural Rubber Research 1986-1997. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Colima, Mexico, 1999 (Universidad de Colima, Colima, 1999) 488-497.
27. P. Vinkler, Ratio of short term and long term impact factors and relationships of chemistry journals represented by references. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Colima, Mexico, 1999 (Universidad de Colima, Colima, 1999) 513-21.
28. O. Shenkar and E. Yuchtman-Yaar, Reputation, image, prestige, and goodwill: an interdisciplinary approach to organizational standing, Human Relations 50(11) (1997) 1361-81.
29. A. Abdul-Rahman and S. Hailes, Supporting trust in virtual communities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (2000), Maui (IEEE Computer Society, 2000) 6007-16.
30. K. Aberer and Z. Despotovic, Managing trust in a peer2-peer information system. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) Atlanta, 2001 (ACM Press, 2001) 310-17.
31. K.S. Barber and J. Kim, Belife revision process based on trust: agents evaluating reputation of information sources. In: R. Falcone et al. (eds), Trust in Cybersocieties, Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 2246 (Springer, 2001) 73-82. Volume is based on a workshop on Deception, Fraud, and Trust in Agent Societies held during the Autonomous Agents Conference in Barcelona, Spain in June 2000.
32. K.S. Barber and J. Kim, Belief revision process based on trust: simulation experiments. In: R. Falcone et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Deception, Fraud, and Trust in Agent Societies, Montreal, 2001. 1-12. Available at: www.istc cnr.it/T3/events/aamas/ wstrust04-list.html (accessed 17 May 2005).
33. S. Das, B. Grosz and A. Pfeffer, Learning and decisionmaking for intention reconciliation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Bologna (ACM Press, 2002) 1121-28.
34. C. Dellarocas, Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Minneapolis, 2000 (ACM Press, 2000) 150-70.
35. J.M. Pujol, R. Sanguesa and J. Delgado, Extracting reputation in multi-agent systems by means of social network topology. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Bologna (ACM Press, 2002) 467-74.
36. J. Sabater and C. Sierra, REGRET: a reputation model for gregarious societies (unpublished manuscript, CSCIC-Spanish Scientific Research Council, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain, 2000).
37. J. Sabater and C. Sierra, Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Bologna (ACM Press, 2002) 475-82.
38. S. Sen and N. Sajja, Robustness of reputation-based trust: boolean case. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Bologna (ACM Press, 2002) 288-93.
39. D.G. Sullivan, B. Grosz and S. Kraus, Intention reconciliation by collaborative agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Boston, MA (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2000) 293-300.
40. B. Yu and M.P. Singh, A social mechanism of reputation management in electronic communities. In: M. Klusch and L. Kerschberg (eds), Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, Boston, MA, 2000 (Springer, 2000) 154-65.
41. [Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1860]
42. B. Yu and M.P. Singh, Towards a probabilistic model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Boston, MA (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2001) 125-37.
43. B. Yu and M.P. Singh, Distributed reputation management for electronic commerce, Computational Intelligence 18(4) (2002) 535-49.
44. B. Yu and M.P. Singh, Detecting deception in reputation management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Melbourne (ACM Press, 2003) 73-80.
45. G. Zacharia, A. Moukas and P. Maes, Collaborative reputation mechanisms in electronic marketplaces. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Maui (1999) (IEEE Computer Society, 1999) 8026-32.
46. G. Zacharia and P. Maes, Trust management through reputation mechanisms, Applied Artificial Intelligence (14) (2000) 881-908.
47. W.J. Orlikowski and C.S. Iacono, Research commentary: desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research - a call to theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12(2) (2001) 121-34.
48. G.L. Rein, Literature review of the research on reputation information systems information (unpublished manuscript, SUNY Brockport, 2004).
49. M. Davis, A report of the 8th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI-2001, in Australia July 2001), Library Hi Tech News 18(10) (2001) 3-4.
50. S. Kilman, U.S. rejects widespread testing of cattle at slaughter for now, The Wall Street Journal Online (2004). Available at: http://online.wsj.eom/article/0,SB107299680591818600,00.html (accessed 2 January 2004).
51. S. Kilman, U.S. pegs mad-cow exposure at 81, The Wall Street Journal Online (2003). Available at: http: //online.wsj.com/article/0,SB107272599873790800,00. html (accessed 30 December 2003).
52. S.S. Alhir, UML in a Nutshell (O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopool, CA, 1998).
53. I. Benbasat and R.W. Zmud, The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties, MIS Quarterly 27(2) (2003) 183-94.
54. S. Alter, Sorting out issues about the core, scope, and identity of the IS field, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 (2003) 607-28. [Article 41] Available at: http://cais.isworld.org/articles/default. asp?vol=12&art=4/ (accessed 17 May 2005).
55. P. Gray, Introduction to the debate on the core of the information systems field, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 (2003). Available at: http://cais.isworld.org/articles/default.asp?vols 12&art=42 (accessed 17 May 2005).