Reputation formalization for an information-sharing multi-agent system

Computational Intelligence

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 515-534

  Carter, Jonathan ^a   Bitting, Elijah ^a   Ghorbani, Ali A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agent; Information sharing; Multi agent systems; Reputation; Trust

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; VECTORS;

INFORMATION SHARING;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0036861794     PISSN: 08247935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8640.t01-1-00201     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abdul-Rahman, A., and S. Hailes. 1999. Relying on Trust to Find Eeliable Information. Department of Computer Science, University College London, London.
2. Abdul-Rahman, A., and S. Hailes. 2000. Supporting Trust in Virtual Comminities. Department of Computer Science, University College London, London.
3. Barber, B. 1959. The Logic and Limits of Trust. Grammercy Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 9-17.
4. Birk, A. 2000. Boosting Cooperation by Evolving Trust. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
5. Blair, M. 2001. The SocioWeb. http://www.socioweb.com/̃markbl/socioweb; accessed December 15, 2001.
6. Braynov, S. 2002. Trust Revelation in Multiagent Interaction. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
7. Castelfranchi, C., and R. Falccne. 1998. Principles of trust for MAS: Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 72-79.
8. Dellarocas, C. 2000. Mechanisms for Coping with Unfair Ratings and Discriminatory Behavior in Online Reporting Systems. http://ccs.mit.edu/dell/icis2000.pdf.
9. Duhaime, L. 2001. Canadian Defamation Law. http://www.duhaime.org/ca-defam.htm; accessed December 20, 2001.
10. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 172-173.
11. Global Campaign for Free Expression. Defining Defamation: Principles on Freedom of Expression and Protection of Reputation. http://www.article19.org/docimages/714.htm; accessed January 15, 2002.
12. Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday Anchor Books, NY.
13. Josang, A. 1996. The Right Type of Trust for Distributed Systems. Department of Telematics, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology N-7034, Trondheim, Norway.
14. Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. Wiley, New York.
15. Marsh, S., A.A. Ghorbani, and V.C. Bhavsar. 2001. The ACORN multi-agent system. Submitted to Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Marsh, S., and Y. Masrour. 1997. Agent augmented community information-The ACORN architecture. Proceedings CASCON 97, Toronto, pp. 72-81.
17. Sabater, J., and C. Sierra. 2000. Regret: A Reputation Model for Gregarious Societies. CSCIC-Spanish Scientific Research Council, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
18. Sander, T., and C.F. Tschudin. 1998. In Protecting Mobile Agents Against Malicious Hosts. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley.