Intention reconciliation by collaborative agents

Proceedings - 4th International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, ICMAS 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 293-300

  Sullivan, D G ^a   Grosz, B J ^a   Kraus, S ^b,c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT UTILITY FUNCTION; COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; COLLABORATIVE AGENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM; HOMOGENEOUS GROUP; RESOURCE-BOUNDED; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84962052478     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICMAS.2000.858466     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bratman, M.E. 1987. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Castelfranchi, C. 1998. Modeling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence, 103:157-182.
3. Decker, K. and Li, J. 1998. Coordinated hospital patient scheduling. In Proc. of ICMAS-98, pp. 104-111.
4. Doyle, J. 1991. Rational belief revision. In: Proc. of the Second Intl. Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 163-174.
5. Glass, A. and Grosz, B.J. 1999. Socially conscious decision-making. In Proc. of the Fourth Intl. Conference on Autonomous Agents (to appear).
6. Grosz, B.J. and Kraus, S. 1996. Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence, 86(2):269-357.
7. Grosz, B.J. and Kraus, S. 1999. The evolution of Shared-Plans. In Wooldridge, M. and Rao, A., editors, Foundations and Theories of Rational Agency. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 227-262.
8. Grosz, B.J., Hunsberger, L., and Kraus, S. 1999. Planning and acting together. AI Magazine, 20(4):23-34.
9. Holländer, H. 1990. A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation. American Economic Review, 80(5):1157-1167.
10. Horty, J. and Pollack, M.E. 1998. Option evaluation in context. In Proc. of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 249-262.
11. Iannaccone, L.R. 1992. Sacrifice and stigma: reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectives. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2):271-291.
12. Kalenka, S. and Jennings, N.R. 1999. Socially responsible decision making by autonomous agents. In Proc. of the Fifth Intl. Colloquium on Cognitive Science, pp. 153-169.
13. Kinny, D., Ljungberg, M., Rao, A.S., Sonenberg, E., Tidhar, G., and Werner, E. 1994. Planned team activity. In Castelfranchi, C. and Werner, E., eds., Artificial Social Systems (LNAI-830), pp. 227-256. Springer Verlag.
14. Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., and Zlotkin, G. 1995. Multiagent negotiation under time constraints. Artificial Intelligence, 75(2):297-345.
15. Levesque, H., Cohen, P. and Nunes, J. 1990. On acting together. In Proc. of AAAI-90, pp. 94-99.
16. Rosenschein, J.S. and Zlotkin, G. 1994. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Sandholm, T., Sikka, S., and Norden, S. 1999. Algorithms for optimizing leveled commitment contracts. In Proc. of IJCAI-99, pp. 535-540.
18. Sen, S. 1996. Reciprocity: a foundational principle for promoting cooperative behavior among self-interested agents. In: Proc. of ICMAS-96, pp. 322-329.
19. Sen, S., Haynes, T., and Arora, N. 1997. Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings. Intl. Journal on Human-Computer Studies, 47(3):407-427.
20. Sullivan, D., Glass, A., Grosz, B., and Kraus, S. 1999. Intention reconciliation in the context of teamwork: an initial empirical investigation. In Klusch, M., Shehory, O., Weiss, G., eds., Cooperative Information Agents III (LNAI-1652), pp. 149-162. Springer Verlag.
21. Sycara, J. and Zeng, D. 1996. Coordination of multiple intelligent software agents. Intl. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 5:181-211.
22. Tambe, M. 1997. Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7: 83-124.
23. Xuan, P. and Lesser, V. 1999. Incorporating uncertainty in agent commitments. In Proc. of ATAL-99, pp. 221-234.