Fostering language learning via email: An English - Spanish exchange

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 369-388

  Vinagre, Margarita ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO DE NEBRIJA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444448542     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220500442749     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Aitsiselmi, F. (1999). Second language acquisition through email interaction. ReCALL, 11(2), 4-11.
2. Austin, R., & Mendlik, F. (1993). Email in modern language development. ReCALL, 9, 19-23.
3. Appel, M. C. (1999). Tandem learning by email: some basic principles and a case study. CLCS Occasional Paper No.54. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
4. Barker, T., & Kemp, F. O. (1990). Network theory: a postmodern pedagogy for the writing classroom. In C. Handa (Ed.) Computers and Community: Teaching composition in the Twenty-first Century (pp. 1-27). Portsmouth, NH: Bonyton/Cook Publishers.
5. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6 1), 60-81. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/BELZ.
6. Brammerts, H. (1996). Language learning in tandem using the Internet. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: proceedings of the Hawai'i symposium (pp. 121-130). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
7. Cooper, M. M., & Selfe, C. L. (1990). Computer conferences and learning: authority, resistance and internally persuasive discourse. College English, 52, 847-873.
8. Davis, B. H., & Brewer, J. P. (1997). Electronic discourse: linguistic individuals in virtual space. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
9. Esch, E. (1996). Promoting learner autonomy: criteria for the selection of appropriate methods. In R. Pemberton et al. (Eds.), Taking control-autonomy in language learning (pp. 35-48). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
10. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
11. Harasim, L. (1989). Online education: A new domain. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 50-62). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
12. Hoffman, R. (1996). Computer networks: Webs of communication for language teaching. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp.55-78). Houston: Athelstan.
13. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
14. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
15. Little, D., & Brammerts, H. (Eds). (1996): A guide to language learning in tandem via the internet. CLCS Occasional Paper No.46. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
16. Little, D., Ushioda, E., Appel, M. C., Moran, J., O'Rourke, B., & Schwienhorst, K. (1999). Evaluating tandem learning by email: report on a bilateral project. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 55. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
17. Muller-Hartmaan, A. (2000). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks. Language Learning and Technology, 4(2), 129-147. Retrieved February 15, 2005 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num2/muller/default.html
18. O'Dowd, R. (2003).Understanding the "other side": intercultural learning in Spanish-English email exchange. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 118-144. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html
19. Pratt, E., & Sullivan, N. (1994). Comparison of ESL writers in networked and regular classrooms. Paper presented at the 28th Annual TESOL Convention, Baltimore, MD.
20. Sakar, A. (2001). The cross-cultural effects of electronic mail exchange on the Turkish university students of English as a foreign languages (EFL). Call - EJ Online, 3(1). Retrieved February 15, 2005, from www.clec.ritsumei.ac.jp/english/callejonline/6-l/sakar.html
21. Sheerin, S. (1997). An exploration of the relationship between self-access and independent learning. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 54-65). London: Longman.
22. Straten, G., Korthagen, F., & Veen, W. (Eds). (1996). Reflection at a distance: An inventorial study into reflection and teleguidance in teacher education. REFLECT Report, Retrieved October 7, 2005, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal.
23. Sullivan, N. (1993). Teaching writing on a computer network. TESOL Journal, 3, 34-35.
24. Ushioda, E. (2000). Tandem language learning via email: from motivation to autonomy. RECALL, 12, 121-128.
25. Warschauer, M. (1996a). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
26. Warschauer, M. (1996b). Computer-assisted language learning: an introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-10). Tokyo: Logos International.
27. Warschauer, M. (Ed.). (1996c). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning:proceedings of the Hawaii Symposium. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
28. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds). (2000). Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Windeatt, S., Hardisty, D., & Eastment, D. (2000). The internet. Oxford Resources Books for Teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Woodin, J. (1997). Email tandem learning and the communicative curriculum. ReCALL, 9, 22-33.