Email tandem learning and the communicative curriculum

ReCALL

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 22-33

  Woodin, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933480615     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344000004596     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Naiman, N., Frolich, M., Stem, H. H. and Todesco, A. The Good language Learner, Research in Education series 7, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1978.
2. Pica, T. ‘Classroom Interaction, Negotiation and Comprehension: Redefining Relationships’, System, 19(4) 1991, pp. 437-492.
3. Dickinson, L. Learner Training for Language Learning, Autentik, Dublin, 1992.
4. Ellis, R. Understanding Second Language Acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986.
5. Dickinson,
6. Naiman et al.,
7. I. Skehan, P. Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning, Edward Arnold, London, 1989.
8. Batson, T. ‘The origins of ENFI’, in Bruce, B., Batson, T. and Peyton, J. K. (eds.), Network-Based Classrooms - Promises and Realities, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
9. Murray, D. Conversation for action: the computer terminal as a medium of communication, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1991.
10. Tannen, D. ‘Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse’, in Olson, D., Torrance, N. and Hildyard, A. (eds.), Literacy, Language, and learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
11. Murray, Computers & Composition, p. 152.
12. Moran, C. ‘We write, but do we read?’ Computers & Composition, 8(3) 1993, pp. 51-61.
13. Canale, M. and Swain, M. ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing’, Applied Linguistics 1(1) 1980, pp. 1-47.
14. Tarone, E. and Yule, G. Focus on the Language Learner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991.
15. Canale and Swain, p. 27.
16. Phillips, M. ‘Potential paradigms and possible problems for CALL’, System, 15(3) 1987, pp. 275-287.
17. Tillyer, A. ‘Cyberspace as a Second Language: A Simple Classroom Internet Guide’, Paper presented at EUROCALL 95 Conference, Valencia, Spain, 1995.
18. Vilmi, R. ‘Helsinki University of Technology E-Mail Writing Project', in Technology Enhanced Language Learning: Focus on Integration’, Proceedings of EUROCALL 95, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 1995.
19. Yule, F. and Tarone, E. ‘Eliciting the Performance of Strategic Competence’, in Scarcella, R., Anderson, E. and Krashen, S. (eds.), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language, Newbury House, New York, 1990.
20. Lightbown, P. and Spada, N. How Languages are Learned, Oxford University Press, 1993.
21. Lewis, T., Woodin, J. and St. John, E. ‘Tandem Learning: Independence through Partnership’, in Broady, E. and Kenning, M.-M. (eds.), Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching, CILT, London, 1996.
22. Brammerts, H. L'approche communicative et l'ordinateur. Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée, 100, 1995, pp. 67-77.