Annealing function of GroEL: Structural and bioinformatic analysis

Biophysical Chemistry

Volumn 100, Issue 1-3, 2002, Pages 453-467

  Stan, George ^a   Thirumalai, D ^b   Lorimer, George H ^c   Brooks, Bernard R ^a  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Annealing; Chaperonin function; Escherichia coli; GroEL

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 60; NUCLEOTIDE; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ALLOSTERISM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; ELECTRICITY; ENTROPY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MICROENVIRONMENT; MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECRETION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 0037438479     PISSN: 03014622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4622(02)00298-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Prot. Sci. 6:2000;743-760.
2. Dill K.A., Chan H.S. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4:1997;10-19.
3. Onuchic J.N., Luthey-Schulten Z., Wolynes P.G. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48:1997;545-600.
4. Thirumalai D., Woodson S.A. Kinetics of folding of proteins and RNA. Acc. Chem. Res. 29:1996;433-439.
5. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Coupling between protein folding and allostery in the GroE chaperonin system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;1521-1524.
6. Todd M.J., Viitanen P.V., Lorimer G.H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implication for facilitated protein folding. Science. 256:1994;659-666.
7. Rye H.S., Roseman A.M., Chen S., Funak K., Fenton W.A., Saibil H.R., Horwich A.L. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. Cell. 97:1999;325-338.
8. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hedge R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal-structure of the bacterial chaperonin at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
9. Hunt J.F., Weaver A.J., Landry S.J., Gierasch L., Diesenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37-45.
10. Ranson N.A., Farr G.W., Roseman A.M., Gowen B., Horwich A.L., Saibil H.R. ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy. Cell. 107:2001;869-879.
11. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
12. Thirumalai D., Lorimer G.H. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:2001;245-269.
13. Horovitz A., Fridmann Y., Kafri G., Yifrach O. Allostery in chaperonins. J. Struct. Biol. 135:2001;104-114.
14. Betancourt M.R., Thirumalai D. Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. J. Mol. Biol. 287:1999;627-644.
15. Todd M.J., Lorimer G.H., Thirumalai D. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4030-4035.
16. Brinker A., Pfeifer G., Kerner M.J., Naylor D.J., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell. 107:2001;223-233.
17. Fenton W.A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., Horwich A.L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
18. Chen L.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell. 99:1999;757-768.
19. Buckle A.M., Zahn R., Fersht A.R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;3571-3575.
20. Zahn R., Perrett S., Stenberg G., Fersht A.R. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science. 271:1996;642-645.
21. Shtilerman M., Lorimer G.H., Englander S.W. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. Science. 284:1999;822-825.
22. Lee B., Richards F.M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55:1971;379-400.
23. Miller S., Janin J., Lesk A.M., Chothia C. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 196:1987;641-656.
24. Horovitz A., Bochkareva E.S., Yifrach O., Girshovich A.S. Prediction of an inter-residue in the chaperonin GroEL from multiple sequence alignment is confirmed by double-mutant cycle analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 238:1994;133-138.
25. Structural models of GroEL do not include 23 carboxy-terminal residues, which are not visible in the available crystal structures [8, 11, 30].
26. Weissman J.S., Rye H.S., Fenton W.A., Beechem J.M., Horwich A.L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell. 83:1995;577-587.
27. Brocchieri L., Karlin S. Conservation among HSP60 sequences in relation to structure, function, and evolution. Prot. Sci. 9:2000;476-486.
28. J.F. Hunt, private communication.
29. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schäffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402.
30. Boisvert D.C., Wang J., Otwinowski Z., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP-γS. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:1996;170-177.
31. Kass I., Horovitz A. Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations'. Prot.: Struct. Funct. Genet. 48:2002;611-617.
32. Ma J.P., Siegler P.B., Xu Z., Karplus M. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 302:2000;303-313.
33. Kraulis P.J. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 24:1991;946-950.
34. Povscript was written by Dan Peisach of Brandeis University.
35. Sayle R., Milner-White E.J. RasMol: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:1995;374.
36. Bernstein H.J. Recent changes to RasMol, recombining the variants. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;453-455.
37. ®.
38. Eisenberg D., Schwartz E., Komaromy M., Wall R. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J. Mol. Biol. 179:1984;125-142.