Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 510-516

  Kohles, Sean S ^a,b,c   Clark, Melissa B ^d   Brown, Christopher A ^e   Kenealy, James N ^f  

^a Kohles Bioengineering   (United States)

^b Portland State University   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Rhode Island Orthodontic Group   (United States)

^e Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^f Clinical Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Implant surfaces; Profilometry; Surface metrology

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; IMPLANT; INTERFEROMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DURAPATITE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; INTERFEROMETRY; MATERIALS TESTING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 4444256751     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;11(suppl 16):1-132.
2. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996;17:137-146.
3. Caulier H, Vercaigne S, Naert I, et al. The effect of Ca-P plasma-sprayed coatings on the initial bone healing of oral implants: An experimental study in the goat. J Biomed Mat Res 1997;34:121-128.
4. Chehroudi B, McDonnell D, Brunnette DM. The effects of micromachined surfaces on formation of bonelike tissue on subcutaneous implants as assessed by radiography and computer image processing. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:279-290.
5. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
6. 2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-1231.
7. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on profileration, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22.
9. Wennerberg A. Importance of surface roughness for implant incorporation. Int J Machine Tools Manufacture 1998;38:657-662.
10. Piattelli A, Trisi P. Bone ingrowth into hydroxyapatite coating: A light microscopy and laser scanning microscopy study. Biomaterials 1993;14:973-977.
11. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
12. Hansson S. Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: A critical analysis. J Biomech 2000;33:1297-1303.
13. Ogiso M, Nakabayashi N, Matsumoto T, Yamamura M, Lee RR. Adhesive improvement of the mechanical properties of a dense HA-cemented Ti dental implant. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:109-116.
14. Bhushan B, Gupta BK. Handbook of Tribology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991:7.1-7.25.
15. Nakashima Y, Hayashi K, Inadome T, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coating on titanium arc sprayed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:287-298.
16. Kitsugi T, Nakamura T, Oka M, et al. Bone bonding behavior of titanium and its alloys when coated with titanium oxide and titanium silicate. J Biomed Mat Res 1996;32:149-156.
17. Whitehouse DJ. Handbook of Surface Metrology. Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing, 1994:409-421.
18. Bennett JM, Mattsson L. Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America, 1989:7-12.
19. Clark MB. Standardization of Profilometry Measurements in Dental Implants [thesis]. Worcester, MA: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2000.
20. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
21. Thomas TR. Rough Surfaces, ed 2. London: Imperial College Press, 1999:1-278.
22. Bourauel C, Fries T, Drescher D, Plietsch R. Surface roughness of orthodontic wires via atomic force microscopy, laser specular reflectance, and profilometry. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:79-92.
23. Al-Nawas B, Grotz KA, Gotz H, et al. Validation of three-dimensional surface characterising methods: Scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Scanning 2001;23:227-231.
24. Brown CA, Johnsen WA, Hult KM. Scale-sensitivity, fractal analysis and simulations. Int J Machine Tools Manufacture 1998;18:633-637.
25. Vernino AR, Kohles SS, Holt RA, Lee HM, Caudill RF, Kenealy JN. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: A histologic comparison in baboons. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:399-407.
26. Keller JC, Stanford CM, Wightman JP, Draughn RA, Zaharias R. Characterization of titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:939-946.
27. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997;76:1799-1807.
28. American Society for Testing amd Materials, ASTM Committee F04 on Medical and Surgical Materials and Devices. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 13.01. Philadelphia: Author, 2000.
29. Gianoli DJ, Kohles SS, Burnham NA, Clark MB, Brown CA, Kenealy JN. The feasibility of atomic force microscopy as a cytodetachment technique to quantify osteoblastic adhesion with implant surfaces. In: Enderle JD, Macfarlane LL (eds). Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 27th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, March 30-April 1, 2001, Storrs, CT:5-6.
30. Brown CA, Siegmann S. Fundamental scales of adhesion and area-scale fractal analysis. Int J Machine Tools Manufacture 2001;41:1927-1933.
31. Brown CA, Charles PD, Johnsen WA, Chesters S. Fractal analysis of topographic data by the patchwork method. Wear 1993;161:61-67.