Research on cognition and action;Kognitionspsychologische Handlungsforschung

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie

Volumn 208, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 32-54

  Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action; Causation; Cognition; Volition

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144520424     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026//0044-3409.208.12.32     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Ach, N. (1905). Über die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Göttingen:
2. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Aschersleben, G. (1994). Afferente Informationen und die Synchronisation von Ereignissen. Frankfurt: Lang.
3. Aschersleben, G. (1999 a). Aufgabenabhängige Datierung von Ereignissen. Aachen: Shaker.
4. Aschersleben, G. (1999 b). Task-dependent timing of perceptual events. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann & J. Müsseier (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 293-318). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Aschersleben, G. (submitted). Knowledge of results and the timing of actions.
6. Aschersleben, G. & Bachmann, T. (submitted). Synchronization and metacontrast stimulation. Evidence for the dual-process attentional theory.
7. Aschersleben, G., Franz, L. & Miedreich, F. (in preparation). Bimanual advantage in sensorimotor synchronization task.
8. Aschersleben, G. & Müsseier, J. (1999). Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1709-1720.
9. Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (1995). Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 305-317.
10. Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (1997). Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 35-46.
11. Aschersleben, G., Bachmann, T. & Müsseier, J. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Aschersleben, G., Gehrke, J., Paillard, J. & Prinz, W. (submitted). Synchronization with peripheral nerve block: A role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements.
13. Bekkering, H. (in press). Imitation and the mediation of action images. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.). The imitative mind: Development, evolution and brain bases. Cambridge University Press.
14. Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A. & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 153-64.
15. Braß, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A. & Prinz, W. (in press). Compatibility between observed and executed movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial and imitative cues. Brain & Cognition.
16. Braß, M., Bekkering, H. & Prinz, W. (in press). Movement observation affects movement execution: Evidence from a simple response task paradigm. Acta Psychologica.
17. Descartes, R. (1664). Traité de l'homme. Paris: Girard.
18. Donders, F.C. (1862). Die Schnelligkeit psychischer Processe. Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie, 657-681.
19. Eimer, M., Hommel, B. & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
20. Eisner, B. & Hommel, B. (1997). Integration von Wahrnehmung und Handlung: Annahmen zur kognitiven Repräsentation von Verhaltenskonsequenzen. In W. Krause, U. Kotkamp, & R. Goertz (Eds.), KogWis97: Proceedings der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft (pp. 37-38). Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität.
21. Eisner, B. & Hommel, B. (submitted). The impact of conditioned response-effect associations on action planning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Gattis, M., Bekkering, H. & Wohlschläger, A. (in press). When actions are carved at the joints. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
23. Gehrke, J. (1995). Sensorimotor synchronisation: The intensity of afferent feedback affects the timing of movements. MPI-Paper 15/1995.
24. Gehrke, J., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (submitted). Use of afferent information and sensorimotor synchronization: Evidence for a sensory accumulator model.
25. Gottschaldt, K. (1954). Der Aufbau des kindlichen Handelns. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.
26. Hommel, B. (1993 a). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research /Psychologische Forschung, 55, 270-279.
27. Hommel, B. (1993 b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280-290.
28. Hommel, B. (1993 c). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung, 55, 208-222.
29. Hommel, B. (1994 a). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research l Psychologische Forschung, 56, 179-184.
30. Hommel, B. (1994 b). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research /Psychologische Forschung, 56, 261-268.
31. Hommel, B. (1995 a). Conflict versus misguided search as explanation of S-R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica, 89, 37-51.
32. Hommel, B. (1995 b). S-R compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
33. Hommel, B. (1996a). No prevalence of right-left over above-below spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
34. Hommel, B. (1996b). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
35. Hommel, B. (1996 c). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Researcli/Psychologische Forschung, 59, 176186.
36. Hommel, B. (1997 a). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulusresponse compatibility. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 59, 248- 260.
37. Hommel, B. (1997b). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
38. Hommel, B. (1998 a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368- 1384.
39. Hommel, B. (1998 b). Observing one's own action - and what it leads to. In J. S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems theory and apriori aspects of perception (pp. 143-179). Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
40. Hommel, B. (1998 c). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
41. Hommel, B. (in press, a). Intentional control of automatic stimulus-response translation. In Y. Rossetti & A. Revonsuo (Eds.), Interaction beftveen dissociable conscious and nonconscious processes.
42. Hommel, B. (in press, b). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Hommel, B. & Lippa, Y. (1995). S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 370-374.
44. Hommel, B. & Schneider, W. X. (1998). Visual attention and the selection of manual responses. Manuscript submitted for publication.
45. Hommel, B., Müsseier, J., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (submitted). The theory of event coding: A framework for perception and action. Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Unit for Cognition and Action, Paper Nr. 3/1998.
46. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1 & 2). New York: Holt.
47. Kerzel, D. & Bekkering, H. (submitted). A motor interpretation of the McGurk effect: Evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
48. Kerzel, D., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A. & Prinz, W. (submitted). Launching the effect: Representations of causal movements are influenced by what they lead to.
49. Knoblich, G. & Prinz, W. (submitted). Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing.
50. Knuf, L. (1997). Ideomotorische Phänomene: Neue Fakten für ein altes Problem. Entwicklung eines Paradigmas zur kinematischen Analyse induzierter Mitbewegungen. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, München.
51. Knuf, L., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (submitted). An analysis ofideomotor action.
52. Lewin, K. (1926). Vorsatz, Wille und Bedürfnis. Psychologische Forschung, 7, 330-385.
53. Lewin, K. (1934). Der Richtungsbegriff in der Psychologie. Psychologische Forschung, 19, 249-299.
54. Lippa, Y. (1996). A referential-coding explanation for compatibility effects of physically orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 950-971.
55. Lippa, Y. & Adam, J. (submitted). Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility due to spatial transformations.
56. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
57. Mates, J. & Aschersleben, G. (in press). Sensorimotor synchronization: The influence of temporally displaced auditory feedback. Acta Psychologica.
58. Miedreich, F. (2000). Zeitliche Steuerung von Handlungen. Empirischer Test des WingKristofferson Modells. Aachen: Shaker.
59. Mietfreien, F., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (in preparation). Timing and motor control in simple repetitive movements.
60. Müller, K., Aschersleben, G., Koch, R., Freund, H.-J. & Prinz, W. (1999). Action timing in an isochronous tapping task: Evidence from behavioral studies and neuroimaging. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann & J. Müsseier (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 233-250). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
61. Müller, K., Aschersleben, G., Schmilz, F., Schnitzler, A., Freund, H.-J. & Prinz, W. (in press). Neuromagnetic correlates of sensorimotor synchronization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
62. Münsterberg, H. (1888). Die Willenshandlung. Ein Beitrag der physiologischen Psychologie. Freiburg: Moler.
63. Müsseier, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseier (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 121-147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
64. Müsseier, J. & Aschersleben, G. (1996). Zur Rolle visueller Aufmerksamkeitsverlagerungen bei der Etablierung einer (subjektiv berichtbaren) Raumrepräsentation. In B. Mertsching (Hrsg.), Aktives Sehen in technischen und biologischen Systemen (S. 83-92). Sankt Augustin: Infix.
65. Müsseier, J. & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich Effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics, 4, 683-695.
66. Müsseier, J. & Hommel, B. (1997 a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
67. Müsseier, J. & Hommel, B. (1997 b). Detection and identification of response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125-129.
68. Müsseier, J. & Neumann, O. (1992). Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): Evidence for an attentional-shifting model. Psychological Research, 54, 246-266.
69. Müsseier, J., Steininger, S. & Wühr, P. (in press). Can actions actually affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
70. Müsseier, J., Wühr, P. & Prinz, W. (in press). Varying the response code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition.
71. Müsseier, J., van der Heijden, A. H. C., Mahmud, S. H., Deubel, H. & Ertsey, S. (1999). Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli on the retinal periphery. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1646-1661.
72. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York, N.Y.: Appleton-Century.
73. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships behveen perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167201). Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag.
74. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129-154.
75. Prinz, W. (1998). Die Reaktion als Willenshandlung. Psychologische Rundschau, 49 (1), (S. 10-20).
76. Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B. & Vogt, S. (1995). Handlungen als Ereignisse. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Hrsg.), Das Gedächtnis. Probleme, Trends, Perspektiven (S. 129-168). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
77. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Schubö, A. (1998). Interferenz von Wahrnehmung und Handlungssteuerung. Aachen: Shaker.
79. Schubö, A., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (submitted). Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments.
80. Steininger, S. (1999). Handeln und Wahrnehmen. Eine experimentelle Analyse einer Wahrnehmungsbeeinträchtigung bei simultan ausgeführten Handlungen. Dissertation. Universität München.
81. Stoet, G. (1998). The role of feature integration in action planning. Unpublished Dissertation. Munich, Germany.
82. Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (submitted). When seeing impairs doing: Feature binding in perception and action.
83. Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 16251640.
84. Stürmer, B., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (in press). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study on imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Production.
85. van der Heijden, A. H. C., Müsseier, J. & Bridgeman, B. (1999). On the perception of positions. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann & J. Müsseier (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 19-37). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
86. Wohlschläger, A. (1996). Mental rotation - a case of embodied action. In: The American Association for Artificial Intelligence (Ed.), Embodied Cognition & Action. Papers from the 1996 AAAI Fall Symposium. Technical Report FS-96-05 (S. 139-144). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
87. Wohlschläger, A. (submitted, a). Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements.
88. Wohlschläger, A. (submitted, b). Visual motion priming by unseen hand movements.
89. Wohlschläger, A. & Wohlschläger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (2), 397-412.
90. Wühr, P. & Müsseier, J. (submitted). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli.
91. Wundt, W. (1903). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. 3 Bd., Leipzig: Engelmann.