No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 102-110

  Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0029718885     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03205480     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AREND, U., & WANDMACHER, J. (1987). On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks. Acta Psychologica, 65, 193-210.
2. BREBNER, J., SHEPHARD, M., & CAIRNEY, P. (1972). Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 36, 1-15.
3. CASTIELLO, U., & UMILTÀ, C. (1987). Spatial compatibility effects in different sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 18, 276-285.
4. CORBALLIS, M. C., & BEALE, I. L. (1976). The psychology of left and right. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. DE JONG, R., LIANG, C.-C., & LAUBER, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731-750.
6. EHRENSTEIN, W. H. (1994). The Simon effect and visual motion. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 163-169.
7. EIMER, M., HOMMEL, B., & PRINZ, W. (in press). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica.
8. GUIARD, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331-342.
9. HASBROUCQ, T., & GUIARD, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 246-266.
10. HEDGE, A., & MARSH, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
11. HOMMEL, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 270-279.
12. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
13. LADAVAS, E., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (1984). Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 205-215.
14. LAMBERTS, K., TAVERNIER, G., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 79, 115-130.
15. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 286-298.
16. MICHAELS, C. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 231-240.
17. NICOLETTI, R., & UMILTÀ, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
18. NICOLETTI, R., & UMILTÀ, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 211-216.
19. NICOLETTI, R., UMILTÀ, C., TRESSOLDI, E. P., & MARZI, C. A. (1988). Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 287-292.
20. NYSTROM, C. O., & GRANT, D. A. (1955). Performance on a key-pressing task as a function of the angular correspondence between stimulus and response elements. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 5, 113-125.
21. PRINZ, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. PROCTOR, R. W., VAN ZANDT, T., LU, C.-H., & WEEKS, D. J. (1993). Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: Perception of affordances or directional coding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 81-91.
23. SIMON, J. R., & RUDELL, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
24. UMILTÀ, C.,& LIOTTI, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.
25. UMILTÀ, C., & NICOLETTI, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
26. WALLACE, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.