Analysing the genetic control of peach fruit quality through an ecophysiological model combined with a QTL approach

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 56, Issue 422, 2005, Pages 3083-3092

  Quilot, B ^a   Kervella, J ^a   Genard M ^b   Lescourret, F ^b  

^a Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^b Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

Author keywords

Ecophysiology; Fruit quality; Genotypic variation; Modelling; Peach; QTL

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; FRUITS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ECOPHYSIOLOGY; FRUIT QUALITY; GENOTYPIC VARIATION; PEACH; QTL;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; EVALUATION; FRUIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRUNUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGRICULTURE; CROSSES, GENETIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FRUIT; GENOTYPE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PRUNUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ECOLOGY; FRUITS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PHYSIOLOGY;

PRUNUS; PRUNUS DAVIDIANA; PRUNUS PERSICA; PRUNUS PERSICA NUCIPERSICA;

EID: 28544438310     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri305     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abbott AG, Rajapakse S, Sosinski B, Lu ZX, Sossey-Alaoui K, Scorza R, Callahan A. 1998. Construction of saturated linkage maps of peach crosses segregating for characters controlling fruit quality, tree architecture and pest disease. Acta Horticulturae 465, 41-50.
2. Boote KJ, Jones JW, Pickering NB. 1996. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agronomy Journal 88, 704-716.
3. Buck-Sorlin G, Bachmann K. 2000. Simulating the morphology of barley spike phenotypes using genotype information. Agronomie 20, 691-702.
4. Corelli-Grappadelli L, Coston DC. 1991. Thinning pattern and light environment in peach tree canopies influence fruit quality. HortScience 26, 1464-1466.
5. Etienne C, Rothan C, Moing A, Plomion C, Bodenes C, Svanella-Dumas L, Cosson P, Pronier V, Monet R, Dirlewanger E. 2002. Candidate genes and QTLs for sugar and organic acid content in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105, 145-159.
6. Foulongne M, Pascal T, Pfeiffer F, Kervella J. 2003. QTLs for powdery mildew resistance in peachxPrunus davidiana crosses: consistency across generations and environments. Molecular Breeding 12, 33-50.
7. Génard M. 1992. Influence du nombre de feuilles et de la répartition des fruits sur la production et la qualité des pêches. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 72, 517-525.
8. Génard M, Bruchou C. 1992. Multivariate analysis of within-tree factors accounting for the variation of peach fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 52, 37-51.
9. Hammer GL, Butler DG, Muchow RC, Meinke H. 1996. Integrating physiological understanding and plant breeding via crop modelling and optimization. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL, eds. Plant adaptation and crop improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 419-441.
10. Johnson RS, Handley DF. 1989. Thinning response of early-, mid-, and late-season peaches. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 114, 852-855.
11. Kliewer WM, Weaver RJ. 1971. Effect of crop level and leaf area on growth, composition and coloration of Tokay grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 22, 172-177.
12. Kobayashi K, Us Salam M. 2000. Comparing simulated and measured values using mean squared deviation and its components. Agronomy Journal 92, 345-352.
13. Marini RP, Sowers DL, Marini MC. 1991. Peach fruit quality is affected by shade during final swell of fruit growth. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116, 383-389.
14. Ognjanov V, Vujanic-Varga D, Misic PD, Veresbaranji I, Macet K, Tesovic Z, Krstic M, Petrovic N. 1995. Anatomical and biochemical studies of fruit development in peach. Scientia Horticulturae 64, 33-48.
15. Pascal T, Kervella J, Pfeiffer F, Sauge MH, Esmenjaud D. 1998. Evaluation of the interspecific progeny Prunus persica cv. SummergrandxPrunus davidiana for disease resistance and some agronomic features. Acta Horticulturae 465, 185-192.
16. Quarta R, Dettori MT, Verde I, Gentile A, Broda Z. 1998. Genetic analysis of agronomic traits and genetic linkage mapping in a BC1 peach population using RFLPs and RAPDs. Acta Horticulturae 465, 51-60.
17. Quilot B, Génard M, Lescourret F, Kervella J. 2005. Simulating genotypic variations of fruit quality in an advanced peachx Prunus davidiana cross. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 3071-3081.
18. Quilot B, Wu B, Kervella J, Génard M, Foulongne M, Moreau K. 2004. QTL analysis of quality traits in an advanced back-cross between Prunus persica cultivars and the wild relative species P. davidiana. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 884-897.
19. Reymond M, Muller B, Leonardi A, Charcosset A, Tardieu F. 2003. Combining quantitative trait loci. Analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiology 131, 664-675.
20. Saliba-Colombani V, Causse M, Langlois D, Philouze J, Buret M. 2001. Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato. I. Mapping QTLs for physical and chemical traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102, 259-272.
21. Scorza R, May LG, Purnell B, Upchurch B. 1991. Differences in number and area of mesocarp cells between small- and large-fruited peach cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116, 861-864.
22. Shorter R, Lawn RJ, Hammer GL. 1991. Improving genotypic adaptation in crops: a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture 27, 155-175.
23. Tardieu F. 2003. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 8, 9-14.
24. Veldboom LR, Lee M. 1996. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in maize in stress and non-stress environments. I. Grain yield and yield components. Crop Science 36, 1310-1319.
25. Yamaguchi M, Haji T, Miyake M, Yaegaki H. 2002. Studies on the varietal differences and yearly deviation of mesocarp cell numbers and lengths and fruit weight among commercial peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars and selections, wild types, and their hybrids. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 71, 459-466.
26. Yin X, Chasalow SC, Dourleijn CJ, Stam P, Kropff MJ. 2000. Coupling estimated effects of QTLs for physiological traits to a crop growth model: predicting yield variation among recombinant inbred lines in barley. Heredity 85, 539-549.
27. Yin X, Kropff MJ, Stam P. 1999. The role of ecophysiological models in QTL analysis: the example of specific leaf area in barley. Heredity 82, 415-421.
28. Yin X, Stam P, Kropff MJ, Schapendonk HCM. 2003. Crop modelling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding. Agronomy Journal 95, 90-98.