Simulating genotypic variation of fruit quality in an advanced peach x Prunus davidiana cross

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 56, Issue 422, 2005, Pages 3071-3081

  Quilot, B ^a   Genard M ^b   Lescourret, F ^b   Kervella, J ^a  

^a Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^b Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

Author keywords

Fruit; Genotypic variation; Growth; Modelling; Prunus persica; Sugars

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; FRUITS; GROWTH KINETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY;

FRUIT QUALITY; GENOTYPIC MODELS; GROWTH DEMAND; PRUNUS PERSICA;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; EVALUATION; FRUIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRUNUS;

AGRICULTURE; CROSSES, GENETIC; FRUIT; GENOTYPE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PRUNUS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ECOLOGY; FRUITS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GROWTH RATE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRUNUS; SUGARS;

PRUNUS; PRUNUS DAVIDIANA; PRUNUS PERSICA; PRUNUS PERSICA NUCIPERSICA;

EID: 28544443302     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri304     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ben Mimoun M. 1997. Vers la maîtrise de la variabilité des fruits au sein de l'arbre: Etude et modélization de la croissance des pêches (Prunus persica) à l'échelle du rameau. PhD thesis, INAPG, France.
2. Boote KJ, Kropff MJ, Bindraban PS. 2001. Physiology and modelling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement. Agricultural Systems 70, 395-420.
3. Chambers JM, Hastie TJ. 1992. Statistical models. In: Brook-Cole W, ed. Computer science series. California: Pacific Grove.
4. Dejong TM, Doyle JF, Day KR. 1987. Seasonal patterns of reproductive and vegetative sink activity in early and late maturing peach (Prunus persica) cultivars. Physiologia Plantarum 71, 83-88.
5. Dejong TM, Goudriaan J. 1989. Modeling peach fruit growth and carbohydrate requirements: re-evaluation of the double-sigmoid growth pattern. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 114, 800-804.
6. Fishman S, Génard M. 1998. A biophysical model of fruit growth: simulation of seasonal and diurnal dynamics of mass. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 739-752.
7. Génard M, Baret F. 1994. Spatial and temporal variation of light inside peach trees. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 119, 669-677.
8. Gomez L, Rubio E, Augé M. 2002. A new procedure for extraction and measurement of soluble sugars in ligneous plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 82, 360-369.
9. Green PB, Cummins WR. 1974. Growth rate and turgor pressure: auxin effect studied with an automated apparatus for single coleoptiles. Plant Physiology 54, 863-869.
10. Grossman YL, Dejong TM. 1994a. PEACH: a simulation model of reproductive and vegetative growth in peach trees. Tree Physiology 14, 329-345.
11. Grossman YL, Dejong TM. 1994b. Carbohydrate requirements for dark respiration by peach vegetative organs. Tree Physiology 14, 37-48.
12. Higgins SS, Larsen FE, Bendel RB, Radamaker GK, Bassman JH, Bidlake WR, Al Wir A. 1992. Comparative gas exchange characteristics of potted, glasshouse-grown almond, apple, fig, grape, olive, peach, and Asian pear. Scientia Horticulturae 52, 313-329.
13. Jackson P, Robertson M, Cooper M, Hammer GL. 1996. The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding; from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Research 49, 11-37.
14. Kobayashia K, Us Salam M. 2000. Comparing simulated and measured values using mean squared deviation and its components. Agronomy Journal 92, 345-352.
15. Lescourret F, Ben Mimoun M, Génard M. 1998. A simulation model of growth at the shoot-bearing-fruit level. I Description and parameterization for peach. European Journal of Agronomy 9, 173-188.
16. Lobit P, Soing P, Génard M, Habib R. 2002. Theoretical analysis of relationships between composition, pH, and titratable acidity of peach fruit. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25, 2775-2792.
17. Moing A, Poëssel JL, Svanella-Dumas L, Loonis M, Kervella J. 2003. Biochemical basis of low fruit quality of Prunus davidiana, a pest and disease resistance donor for peach breeding. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128, 55-62.
18. Moing A, Svanella L, Rolin D, Gaudillère M, Gaudillère JP, Monet R. 1998. Compositional changes during the fruit development of two peach cultivars differing in juice acidity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123, 770-775.
19. Pascal T, Kervella J, Pfeiffer F, Sauge MH, Esmenjaud D. 1998. Evaluation of the interspecific progeny Prunus persica cv. Summergrand. Acta Horticulturae 465, 185-192.
20. Quilot B. 2003. Vers une démarche de sélection variétale assistée par des modèles écophysiologiques et génétiques. Cas de la qualité organoleptique chez la pêche (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch). PhD thesis, INAPG, France.
21. Quilot B, Génard M, Kervella J. 2004a. Leaf light saturated photosynthesis for wild and cultivated peach genotypes and their hybrids: a simple mathematical modelling analysis. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 79, 546-553.
22. Quilot B, Génard M, Kervella J, Lescourret F. 2002. Ecophysiological analysis of genotype variation in peach fruit growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1613-1625.
23. Quilot B, Génard M, Kervella J, Lescourret F. 2004b. Analysis of genotypic variations in flesh total sugar content via a modelling approach applied to peach fruit. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 440-449.
24. Quilot B, Kervella J, Génard M, Lescourret F. 2005. Analysing the genetic control of peach fruit quality through an ecophysiological model combined with a QTL approach. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 3083-3092.
25. Tardieu F. 2003. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 8, 9-14.
26. Wu B, Quilot B, Kervella J, Génard M, Li S. 2003. Analysis of genotypic variation of sugar and acid contents in peaches and nectarines through the Principle Component Analysis. Euphytica 132, 375-384.