Preparing for perception and action (II): Automatic and effortful process in response cueing

Visual Cognition

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1444-1473

  Adam, Jos J ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^b   Umiltà, Carlo ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 28044438722     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000779     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adam, J. J. (1992). The spatial proximity hypothesis of the hand advantage in spatial precuing tasks. Human Movement Science, 11, 641-652.
2. Adam, J. J. (1994). Manipulating the spatial arrangement of stimuli in a preening task. Acta Psychologica, 85, 183-202.
3. Adam, J. J., Backes, W., Rijcken, J., Hofman, P., Kuipers, H., & Jolles, J. (2003). Rapid visuomotor preparation in the human brain: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 1-10.
4. Adam, J. J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2003). Preparing for perception and action (I): The role of grouping in the response-cuing task. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 302-358.
5. Adam, J. J., Keyson, D. V., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1997). Vibro-tactual choice reaction time in a precuing task. Human Movement Science, 16, 549-565.
6. Adam, J. J., Paas, F. G. W. C., Teeken, J. C., van Loon, E. M., van Boxtel, M. P. J., Houx, P. J., & Jolles, J. (1998). Effects age on performance in a finger preening task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 870-883.
7. Adam, J. J., & Pratt, J. (2004). Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1092-1106.
8. Alain, C., Buckolz, E., & Taktak, K. (1993). Same-hand and different-hand finger pairings in twwo-choice reaction time: Presence or absence of response competition? Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 45-51.
9. Allen, P. A., Groth, K. E., Weber, T. A., & Madden, D. J. (1993). Influence of response selection and noise similarity on age differences in the redundancy gain. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, P189-P198.
10. Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2003). Object segmentation by top-down processes. Visual Cognition, 10, 471-491.
11. Briand, K., & Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"? On the relationship between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 228-241.
12. Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. London: Academic Press.
13. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
14. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1998). Visuomotor priming. Visual Cognition, 5, 109-125.
15. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
16. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
17. Frith, C. D., & Done, D. J. (1986). Routes to action in reaction time tasks. Psychological Research, 48, 169-177.
18. Fuster, J. M. (2003). Cortex and mind: Unifying cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Goldberg, M. E., & Segraves, M. A. (1987). Visuospatial attention and motor attention in the monkey. Neuropsychologia, 25, 107-118.
20. Goldsmith, M. (1998). What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 189-219.
21. Hasbroucq, T., Mouret, I., Seal, J., & Akamatsu, M. (1995). Finger pairings in two-choice reaction time tasks: Does the between-hands advantage reflect response preparation? Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 251-262.
22. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.
23. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
24. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
25. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over above-below spatial codes. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
26. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
28. Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360-365.
29. Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392-420.
30. Hoyer, W. J., & Plude, D. J., (1980). Attentional and perceptual processes in the study of cognitive aging. In L.W. Poon (Ed.), Aging in the 1980's: Psychological issues (pp. 227-238). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188-196.
32. Jonides, J. (1980). Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 103-112.
33. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
34. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
35. Kornblum, S. (1965). Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 2, 55-56.
36. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
37. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307-323.
39. Lippa, Y. (1996). A referential-coding explanation for compatibility effects of physically orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 950-971.
40. Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174.
41. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
42. Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273-296.
43. Miller, J. (1985). A hand advantage in preparation of simple keypress responses: Reply to Reeve and Proctor (1984). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 221-233.
44. Miller, J. O. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 567-571.
45. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
46. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
47. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
48. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
49. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
50. Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408.
51. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
52. Pratt, J., & Hirshhorn, M. (2003). Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues. Psychological Research, 67, 261-265.
53. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1986). Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 277-285.
54. Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1984). On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 541-553.
55. Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 163-180). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
56. Reeve, T. G., Proctor, R. W., Weeks, D. J., & Dornier, L. (1992). Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 453-460.
57. Riggio, L., Bello, A., & Umiltà, C (1998). Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset. Psychological Research, 61, 107-118.
58. Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L., & Umiltà, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychologia, 62, 89-100.
59. Riggio, L., Scaramuzza, E., & Umiltà, C. (2000). Modulation of inhibition of return by type and number of dynamic changes of the cue. Psychological Research, 64, 56-65.
60. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
61. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
62. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 231-274). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
63. Salthouse, T. A. (1988). Resource-reduction interpretations of cognitive aging. Developmental Review, 8, 238-272.
64. Schall, J. D. (2002). The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B. Biological Science, 357, 1073-1082.
65. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
66. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centred attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
67. Wright, R. D., & Richard, C. M. (2000). Location cue validity affects inhibition of return of visual processing. Vision Research, 40, 2351-2358.
68. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990) Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121-134.