Preparing for perception and action (I): The role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 302-358

  Adam, Jos J ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^b   Umiltà, Carlo ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Gestalt principles; Preparation; Response cuing; Spatial cuing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0038350005     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00516-9     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Adam J.J. The spatial proximity hypothesis of the hand advantage in spatial precuing tasks Human Movement Science 11 1992 641-652
2. Adam J.J. Manipulating the spatial arrangement of stimuli in a precuing task Acta Psychologica 85 1994 183-202
3. Adam, J. J., Backes, W., Rijcken, J., Hofman, P., Kuipers, H., & Jolles, J. (in press). Rapid visuomotor preparation in the human brain: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research
4. Adam, J. J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Preparing for perception and action (II): The role of attention in the response-cuing task. Manuscript in preparation
5. Adam J.J. Keyson D.V. Paas F.G.W.C. Vibro-tactual choice reaction time in a precuing task Human Movement Science 16 1997 549-565
6. Adam J.J. Paas F.G.W.C. Teeken J.C. van Loon E.M. van Boxtel M.P.J. Houx P.J. Jolles J. Effects age on performance in a finger precuing task Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 1998 870-883
7. Adam J.J. van Veggel L.M.A. Manipulating procedural variables in a spatial precuing task Acta Psychologica 81 1992 97-114
8. Adini Y. Sagi D. Parallel processes within the 'spot-light' of attention Spatial Vision 6 1992 61-77
9. Alain C. Buckolz E. Taktak K. Same-hand and different-hand finger pairings in two-choice reaction time: Presence or absence of response competition Journal of Motor Behavior 25 1993 45-51
10. Allport D.A. Visual attention In Posner M.I. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science Vol. 2 1989 631-682 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
11. Baylis G.C. Driver J. Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors Perception & Psychophysics 51 1992 145-162
12. Baylis G.C. Driver J. Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9 1993 451-470
13. Broadbent D.E. Decision and stress 1971 Academic Press London
14. Cohen A. Shoup R. Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes Cognitive Psychology 32 1997 128-181
15. Corballis M.C. Beale I.L. The ambivalent mind 1983 Nelson-Hall Chicago, IL
16. Craighero L. Fadiga L. Rizzolatti G. Umiltà C. Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 1999 1673-1692
17. De Jong R. Liang C.-C. Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 1994 731-750
18. De Jong R. Wierda M. Mulder G. Mulder L.J.M. Use of partial stimulus information in response processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 1988 682-692
19. Duncan J. Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity Psychological Review 96 1989 433-458
20. Eimer M. Hommel B. Prinz W. S-R compatibility and response selection Acta Psychologica 90 1995 301-313
21. Eriksen C.W. Attentional search of the visual field In Brogan D. (Ed.), Visual search 1990 3-19 Taylor & Francis London
22. Eriksen C.W. Rohrbaugh J.W. Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention American Journal of Psychology 83 1970 330-342
23. Farah M.J. Brunn J.L. Wong A.B. Wallace M.A. Carpenter P.A. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome Neuropsychologia 28 1990 335-347
24. Gazzaniga M. The bisected brain 1970 Appleton-century-Crofts New York
25. Gehrke J. Hommel B. The impact of exogenous factors on spatial coding in perception and memory In Freksa C. Habel C. Wender K.F. (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge 1998 64-77 Springer Berlin
26. Goldsmith M. What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 1998 189-219
27. Harms L. Bundesen C. Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch Task Perception & Psychophysics 33 1983 11-19
28. Hasbroucq T. Mouret I. Seal J. Akamatsu M. Finger pairings in two-choice reaction time tasks: Does the between-hands advantage reflect response preparation? Journal of Motor Behavior 27 1995 251-262
29. Henderson J.M. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 1991 91-106
30. Hendrikx A.J.P. Compatibility of precuing and of S-R mapping in choice reactions Acta Psychologica 62 1986 59-88
31. Hick W.E. On the rate of gain of information Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 4 1952 11-26
32. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information Psychological Research 55 1993 270-279
33. Hommel B. Attentional scanning in the selection of central targets from multi-symbol strings Visual Cognition 2 1995 119-144
34. Hommel B. No prevalence of right-left over above-below spatial codes Perception & Psychophysics 58 1996 102-110
35. Hommel B. Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility In Hommel B. Prinz W. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility 1997 281-320 North-Holland Amsterdam
36. Hommel B. Observing one's own action-and what it leads to In Jordan J.S. (Ed.), Systems theory and a priori aspects of perception 1998 143-179 North-Holland Amsterdam
37. Hommel B. Gehrke J. Knuf L. Hierarchical coding in the perception and memory of spatial layouts Psychological Research 64 2000 1-10
38. Hommel B. Müsseler J. Aschersleben G. Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 2001 849-937
39. Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 1953 188-196
40. Kahneman D. Treisman A. Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information Cognitive Psychology 24 1992 175-219
41. Keppel G. Design and analysis 1982 Prentice Hall Englewood cliffs, NJ
42. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt psychology 1935 Harcourt, Brace & World New York
43. Kornblum S. Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time Psychonomic Science 2 1965 55-56
44. Kornblum S. Hasbroucq T. Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy Psychological Review 97 1990 253-270
45. Kosslyn S.M. Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate 1994 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
46. Lamberts K. Tavernier G. d'Ydewalle G. Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility Acta Psychologica 79 1992 115-130
47. Leonard J.A. Partial advance information in a choice reaction task British Journal of Psychology 49 1958 89-96
48. Leuthold H. Sommer W. Ulrich R. Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 1996 307-323
49. Lippa Y. A referential-coding explanation for compatibility effects of physically Orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A 1996 950-971
50. Lippa Y. Adam J.J. An explanation of orthogonal S-R compatibility effects that vary with hand or response position: The end-state comfort hypothesis Perception & Psychophysics 63 2001 156-174
51. Logan G.D. Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention Cognitive Psychology 28 1995 103-174
52. Logan G.D. The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention Psychological Review 103 1996 603-649
53. Lynch J.C. The functional organization of posterior parietal association cortex Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 1980 485-534
54. Mack A. Tang B. Tuma R. Kahn S. Rock I. Perceptual organization and attention Cognitive Psychology 24 1992 475-501
55. Mapp A.P. Ono H. Wondering about the wandering cyclopean eye Vision Research 39 1999 2381-2386
56. McCloskey M. Rapp B. Attention-referenced visual representations: Evidence from impaired visual localization Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 2000 917-9336
57. Merikle P.M. Selective backward masking with an unpredictable mask Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 1974 589-591
58. Mewhort D.J.K. Campbell A.J. Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect Perception & Psychophysics 24 1978 93-101
59. Miller J. Discrete versus continuous models of human information processing: In search of partial output Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 1982 273-296
60. Miller J. A hand advantage in preparation of simple keypress responses: Reply to Reeve and Proctor (1984) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 1985 221-233
61. Müsseler J. Hommel B. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 1997 861-872
62. Neely J.H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106 1977 226-254
63. Nicoletti R. Umiltà C. Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility Perception & Psychophysics 35 1984 333-343
64. Nicoletti R. Umiltà C. Splitting visual space with attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 1989 164-169
65. Nicoletti R. Umiltà C. Ladavas E. Compatibility due to the coding of relative position of effectors Acta Psychologica 57 1984 133-143
66. Palmer S.E. Common region: A new principal of perceptual grouping Cognitive Psychology 24 1992 436-447
67. Parsons L.M. Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet Cognitive Psychology 19 1987 178-241
68. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 1980 3-25
69. Posner M.I. Snyder C.R.R. Attention and cognitive control In Solso R.L. Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium 1975 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
70. Posner M.I. Snyder C.R.R. Davidson B.J. Attention and the detection of signals Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 1980 160-174
71. Prinz W. Hommel B. Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & performance XIX 2002 Oxford University Press Oxford
72. Prinzmetal W. Principles of feature integration in visual perception Perception & Psychophysics 30 1981 330-340
73. Proctor R.W. Reeve T.G. Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12 1986 277-285
74. Proctor R.W. Reeve T.G. The acquisition of task-specific productions and modification of declarative representations in spatial precuing tasks Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117 1988 182-196
75. Proctor R.W. Reeve T.G. van Zandt T. Salient-features coding in response selection In Stelmach G.E. Requin J. (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II 1992 727-741 North-Holland Amsterdam
76. Reeve T.G. Proctor R.W. On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 1984 541-553
77. Reeve T.G. Proctor R.W. Non-motoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 1985 234-240
78. Reeve T.G. Proctor R.W. The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects In Proctor R.W. Reeve T.G. (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility 1990 163-180 North-Holland Amsterdam
79. Reeve T.G. Proctor R.W. Weeks D.J. Dornier L. Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks Perception & Psychophysics 52 1992 453-460
80. Requin J. Toward a psychobiology of preparation for action In Stelmach G.E. Requin J. (Eds.). Tutorials in motor behavior 1980 373-398 North-Holland Amsterdam
81. Requin J. Brener J. Ring C. Preparation for action In Jennings J.R. Coles M.G.H. Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches 1991 357-448 Wiley New York
82. Requin J. Riehle A. Seal J. Neural networks for movement preparation In Meyer D.E. Kornblum S. Attention and performance Vol. 14 1993 745-769 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
83. Riggio L. Gawryszewski L. Umiltà C. What is crossed in crossed-hand effects Acta Psychologica 62 1986 89-100
84. Rock I. Linnett C.M. Grant P. Mack A. Perception without attention: Results of a new method Cognitive Psychology 24 1992 502-534
85. Rock I. Palmer S. The legacy of Gestalt psychology Scientific American December 1990 48-61
86. Rock I. Victor J. Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses Science 143 1964 594-596
87. Rosenbaum D.A. Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 1980 444-474
88. Rosenbaum D.A. The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions In Magill R.A. (Ed.), Memory and control of action 1983 231-274 North-Holland Amsterdam
89. Roswarski T.E. Proctor R.W. Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks Psychological Research 59 1996 196-211
90. Sadalla E.K. Burroughs W.J. Staplin L.J. Reference points in spatial cognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 1980 516-528
91. Sanders A.F. Towards a model of stress and human performance Acta Psychologica 51 1983 223-243
92. Schneider W.X. VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action Visual Cognition 2 1995 331-375
93. Schneider W. Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention Psychological Review 84 1977 1-66
94. Simon J.R. Hinrichs J.V. Craft J.L. Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 1970 97-102
95. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method Acta Psychologica 30 1969 276-315
96. Stoffer T.H. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility Psychological Research 53 1991 127-135
97. Tipper S.P. Behrmann M. Object-based not scene-based visual neglect Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 1996 1261-1278
98. Tipper S.P. Lortie C. Baylis G.C. Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 1992 891-905
99. Treisman A.M. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A 1988 201-237
100. van der Heijden A.H.C. Selective attention in vision 1992 Routledge & Kegan London
101. van Oeffelen M.P. Vos P.G. Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups Memory & Cognition 10 1982 396-404
102. van Oeffelen M.P. Vos P.G. An algorithm for pattern description on the level of relative proximity Pattern Recognition 16 1983 341-348
103. Vecera S.P. Farah M.J. Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123 1994 146-160
104. Wallace R.J. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 1971 354-360
105. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 1994 202-238
106. Yantis S. Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization Cognitive Psychology 24 1992 295-340