Divergence, recombination and retention of functionality during protein evolution

Human Genomics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 158-167

  Xu, Yanlong O ^a   Hall, Randall W ^a   Goldstein, Richard A ^b   Pollock, David D ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Divergence; Evolution; Lattice models; Recombination

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; THERMODYNAMICS; VIROGENESIS;

EID: 28044438495     PISSN: 14739542     EISSN: 14797364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1479-7364-2-3-158     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Vendruscolo, M., Najmanovich, R. and Domany, E. (2000), 'Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds decoys obtained by threading?', Proteins Vol. 38, pp. 134-148.
2. Bonneau, R. and Baker, D. (2001), 'Ab initio protein structure prediction: Progress and prospects', Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. Vol. 30, pp. 173-189.
3. Rost, B. (2001), 'Review: Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise', J. Struct. Biol. Vol. 134, pp. 204-218.
4. Hardin, C., Pogorelov, T.V. and Luthey-Schulten, Z. (2002), 'Ab initio protein structure prediction', Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. Vol. 12, pp. 176-181.
5. Mirny, L.A. and Shakhnovich, E.I. (1998), 'Protein structure prediction by threading. Why it works and why it does not', J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 283, pp. 507-526.
6. Lio, P. and Goldman, N. (1998), 'Models of molecular evolution and phylogeny', Genome Res. Vol. 8, pp. 1233-1244.
7. Pollock, D.D. (2002), 'Genomic biodiversity, phylogenetics and coevolution in proteins', Appl. Bioinformatics Vol. 1, pp. 81-92.
8. Ouzounis, C.A. and Valencia, A. (2003), 'Early bioinformatics: The birth of a discipline - A personal view', Bioinformatics Vol. 19, pp. 2176-2190.
9. Koshi, J.M. and Goldstein, R.A. (1998), 'Models of natural mutations including site heterogeneity', Proteins Vol. 32, pp. 289-295.
10. Krishnan, N.M., Raina, S.Z. and Pollock, D.D. (2004), 'Analysis of among-site variation in substitution patterns', Biol. Proced. Online Vol. 6, pp. 180-188.
11. Siepel, A. and Haussler, D. (2004), 'Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by likelihood', Mol. Biol. Evol. Vol. 21, pp. 468-488.
12. Pollock, D.D. and Bruno, W.J. (2000), 'Assessing an unknown evolutionary process: Effect of increasing site-specific knowledge through taxon addition', Mol. Biol. Evol. Vol. 17, pp. 1854-1858.
13. Pollock, D.D., Eisen, J.A., Doggett, N.A. and Cummings, M.P. (2000), 'A case for evolutionary genomics and the comprehensive examination of sequence biodiversity', Mol. Biol. Evol. Vol. 17, pp. 1776-1788.
14. Pollock, D.D., Zwickl, D.J., McGuire, J.A. and Hillis, D.M. (2002), 'Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference', Syst. Biol. Vol. 51, pp. 664-671.
15. Faith, J.J. and Pollock, D.D. (2003), 'Likelihood analysis of asymmetrical mutation bias gradients in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes', Genetics Vol. 165, pp. 735-745.
16. Hillis, D.M., Pollock, D.D., McGuire, J.A. and Zwickl, D.J. (2003), 'Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference?', Syst. Biol. Vol. 52, pp. 124-126.
17. Krishnan, N.M., Seligmann, H., Raina, S.Z. and Pollock, D.D. (2004), 'Detecting gradients of asymmetry in site-specific substitutions in mitochondrial genomes', DNA Cell Biol. Vol. 23, pp. 707-714.
18. Krishnan, N.M., Seligmann, H., Stewart, C.B. et al. (2004), 'Ancestral sequence reconstruction in primate mitochondrial DNA: Compositional bias and effect on functional inference', Mol. Biol. Evol. Vol. 21, pp. 1871-1883.
19. Wang, Z.O. and Pollock, D.D. (2005), 'Context dependence and coevolution among amino acid residues in proteins', Methods Enzymol. Vol. 395, pp. 779-790.
20. Buchler, N.E.G. and Goldstein, R.A. (2000), 'Surveying determinants of protein structure designability across different energy models and amino-acid alphabets: A consensus', J. Chem. Phys. Vol. 112, p. 2533.
21. Buchler, N.E.G. and Goldstein, R.A. (1999), 'Effect of alphabet size and foldability requirements on protein structure designability', Proteins Vol. 34, p. 113.
22. Williams, P.D., Pollock, D.D. and Goldstein, R.A. (2001), 'Evolution of functionality in lattice proteins', J. Mol. Graph. Model. Vol. 19, p. 150.
23. Govindarajan, S. and Goldstein, R.A. (1997), 'Evolution of model proteins on a foldability landscape', Proteins Vol. 29, p. 461.
24. Govindarajan, S. and Goldstein, R.A. (1998), 'On the thermodynamic hypothesis of protein folding', Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, p. 5545.
25. Govindarajan, S., Recabarren, R. and Goldstein, R.A. (1999), 'Estimating the total number of protein folds', Proteins Vol. 35, pp. 408-414.
26. Cui, Y., Wong, W.H., Bornberg-Bauer, E. and Chan, H.S. (2002), 'Recombinatoric exploration of novel folded structures: A heteropolymer-based model of protein evolutionary landscapes', Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 99, p. 809.
27. Dill, K.A., Bromberg, S., Yue, K. et al. (1995), 'Principles of protein folding - A perspective from simple exact models', Protein Sci. Vol. 4, p. 561.
28. Chan, H.S. and Bornberg-Bauer, E. (2002), 'Perspectives on protein evolution from simple exact models', Appl. Bioinformatics Vol. 1, pp. 121-144.
29. Goldstein, R.A. (2003), Evolutionary perspectives on protein folding, structure, and thermodynamics, Abstracts of papers, 226th ACS National Meeting, New York, NY, USA, 7-11th September, 2003, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA.
30. Buchler, N.E.G. and Goldstein, R.A. (1999), 'Universal correlation between energy gap and foldability for the random energy model and lattice proteins', J. Chem. Phys. Vol. 111, p. 6599.
31. Taverna, D.M. and Goldstein, R.A. (2002), 'Why are proteins so robust to site mutations?', J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 315, p. 479.
32. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R.L. (1996), 'Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading', J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 256, p. 623.
33. Taverna, D.M. and Goldstein, R.A. (2000), 'The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations', Biopolymers Vol. 53, p. 1.
34. James, P.C. and Peter, S. (2003), Evolution Dynamics: Exploring the Interplay of Selection, Accident, Neutrality, and Function, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, p. 3.
35. Voigt, C.A., Martinez, C., Wang, Z.G. et al. (2002), 'Protein building blocks preserved by recombination', Nat. Struct. Biol. Vol. 9, p. 553.
36. Dokholyan, N.V, Li, L., Ding, F. and Shakhnovich, E.I. (2002), 'Topological determinants of protein folding', Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 99, pp. 8637-8641.
37. Shakhnovich, B.E., Deeds, E., Delisi, C. and Shakhnovich, E. (2005), 'Protein structure and evolutionary history determine sequence space topology', Genome Res. Vol. 15, pp. 385-392.
38. Bornberg-Bauer, E. (1997), 'How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space?', Biophys. J. Vol. 73, p. 2393.
39. Sullivan, D.C., Aynechi, T., Voelz, V.A. and Kuntz, I.D. (2003), 'Information content of molecular structures', Biophys. J. Vol. 85, p. 174.
40. Lu, H. and Skolnick, J. (2001), 'A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved structure selection', Proteins Vol. 44, pp. 223-232.
41. Keasar, C. and Levitt, M. (2003), 'A novel approach to decoy set generation: Designing a physical energy function having local minima with native structure characteristics', J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 329, pp. 159-174.
42. Seok, C., Rosen, J.B., Chodera, J.D. and Dill, K.A. (2003), 'MOPED: Method for optimizing physical energy parameters using decoys', J. Comput. Chem. Vol. 24, pp. 89-97.
43. Tsai, J., Bonneau, R., Morozov, A.V. et al. (2003), 'An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction', Proteins Vol. 53, pp. 76-87.
44. McConkey, B.J., Sobolev, V. and Edelman, M. (2003), 'Discrimination of native protein structures using atom-atom contact scoring', Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 100, pp. 3215-3220.
45. Emberly, E.G., Miller, J., Zeng, C. et al. (2002), 'Identifying proteins of high designability via surface-exposure patterns', Proteins Vol. 47, pp. 295-304.
46. Larson, S.M., England, J.L., Desjarlais, J.R. and Pande, V.S. (2002), 'Thoroughly sampling sequence space: Large-scale protein design of structural ensembles', Protein Sci. Vol. 11, p. 2804.
47. Hu, C., Li, X. and Liang, J. (2004), 'Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design', Bioinformatics Vol. 20, pp. 3080-3098.