Consultant attitudes to undertaking undergraduate teaching duties: Perspectives from hospitals serving a large medical school

Medical Education

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1129-1139

  Hendry, R G ^a   Kawai, G K ^a   Moody, W E ^a   Sheppard, J E ^a   Smith, L C R ^a   Richardson, M ^b   Mathers, Jonathan M ^b   Parry, J M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

*attitude of health personnel; *Teaching; Clinical medicine *education; Consultants; Education, medical, undergraduate *methods; England; Hospitals, teaching; Humans; Medical staff hospital *psychology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL MEDICINE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSULTATION; CONTRACT; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STAFF; MEDICAL STUDENT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; REWARD; STANDARD; SURGEON; TEACHING; TEACHING HOSPITAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONSULTANTS; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 27844558838     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02320.x     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Department of Health. The NHS Plan. A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform. London: Stationery Office 2000.
2. Stewart PM. Academic medicine: a faltering engine. BMJ 2002;324:437-8.
3. Clark J, Smith R. BMJ Publishing Group to launch an international campaign to promote academic medicine. BMJ 2003;327:1001-2.
4. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: General Medical Council 2002.
5. Morrison J. Where now for problem-based learning? Lancet 2004;363:174.
6. Pabst R, Rothkötter HJ. Retrospective evaluation of undergraduate medical education by doctors at the end of their residency time in hospitals: consequences for the anatomical curriculum. Anat Record 1997;249:431-4.
7. Albanese MA, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993;68 (1):52-81.
8. Vernon DT, Blake RL. Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med 1993;68:550-63.
9. Colliver JA. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: research and theory. Acad Med 2000;75:259-66.
10. Prince K, Mameren H, Hylkema N, Drukker J, Scherpbier AJJ, van der Vleuten CP. Problem-based learning. Does problem-based learning lead to deficiencies in basic science knowledge? An empirical case on anatomy. Med Educ 2003;37:15-21.
11. Seabrook MA, Woodfield SJ, Papagrigoriadis S, Rennie JA, Atherton A, Lawson M. Consistency of teaching in parallel surgical firms: an audit of student experience at one medical school. Med Educ 2000;34:292-8.
12. Johnston B, Boohan M. Basic clinical skills: don't leave teaching to the teaching hospitals. Med Educ 2000;34:692-9.
13. O'Sullivan M, Martin J, Murray E. Students' perceptions of the relative advantages and disadvantages of community-based and hospital-based teaching: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2000;34:648-55.
14. McLean M. Qualities attributed to an ideal educator by medical students: should faculty take cognisance? Med Teacher 2001;23:367-70.
15. Parry JM, Mathers JM, Al-Fares A, Mohammad M, Nandakumar M, Tsivos D. Hostile teaching hospitals and friendly district general hospitals: final year students' views on clinical attachment locations. Med Educ 2002;36:1131-42.
16. Stark P. Teaching and learning in the clinical setting: a qualitative study of the perceptions of students and teachers. Med Educ 2003;37:975-82.
17. Seabrook MA. Medical teachers' concerns about the clinical teaching context. Med Educ 2003;37:213-22.
18. Coady D, Walker D, Kay I. Teaching in the clinical context. [Letter.] Med Educ 2003;37:662-4.
19. Nair BR, Coughlan J, Hensley M. Impediments to bedside teaching. Med Educ 1998;32:159-62.
20. Dolmans HJM, Wolfhagen IH, Essed GC et al. The impacts of supervision, patient mix and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations. Acad Med 2002;77:332-5.
21. Hoffman KG, Donaldson JF. Contextual tensions of the clinical environment and their influence on teaching and learning. Med Educ 2004;38:448-54.
22. Prideaux D, Alexander H, Bower A et al. Clinical teaching: maintaining the educational role for doctors in the new health care environment. Med Educ 2000;34:820-6.
23. Iglehart J. Forum on the future of academic medicine. Acad Med 1999;72:595-9.
24. Graham-Smith D. An encounter with Beethoven's cleaning lady. Lancet 1993;342:1315.
25. Myers KA. Evaluating clinical teachers: does the learning environment matter? Acad Med 2001;76:286.
26. Clack GB, Baty M, Perrin A, Eddleston AL. The development of a more equitable approach to resource allocation and manpower planning for undergraduate teaching in a UK medical school. Med Educ 2001;35:102-9.
27. Stone S, Ellers B, Holmes D et al. Identifying oneself as a teacher: the perceptions of preceptors. Med Educ 2002;36:180-5.
28. Spencer J. The clinical teaching context: a cause for concern. Med Educ 2003;37:182-3.
29. Leinster S. Curriculum planning. Lancet 2003;362:750.